Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Michael John Nunnerley

37 posts · 4 threads started · 128 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between May 2009 and Jan 2017

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

SMD Hydrogen cell (hydrogen from water)

#5 ·

From other forums

I have posted this on other forums to backup what Grum has said above, safty is paramount, wear gloves, nickel compounds are toxic if digested.

For those who are going to use the Nickel hydroxide from a Ni-MH or NI-Cd battery for the electrode, old ones are dry, lost most of the KOH, you could try putting the unrolled innerds into a KOH solution for a few days before unrolling. The other thing is buy new ones, AA is the smallest practical size, C types are easier to work with.

Remember to discharge before opening or you will have a fire, you are warned.

The best way is to make the electrodes as described, as big as you want O0

Regards

Mike 8)

PS. The bigger the mAh of your battery the greater amount of active material, eg 1500mAh not much, 2500mAh quite a lot, final performance will be noted.

CORE GasLess Power - Intelligent Technology to Replace Gas

#4 ·

If you take apart a VCR you will find that these motors have been used for many years, nothing new, I have one here, it came out of a 1990's VCR as the capstan drive motor.

The only difference maybe the winding design on the printed circuit board, but it is very very similar to the photos posted.

regards

Mike

Hydrogen production beyond belief

#15 ·

From my calculations

50cubic feet/min of H2 = 1415 Ltrs/min H2 @ 500watts = 0.35w/ltr

That is OU as far as energy convertion is concerned, but, moving that amount of H2 is also an item!! H2 in liquid water is a very fine bubble, the mechanics of moving that volume would mean that a vacuum is being used in the reactor or it is water mist being reacted so as it does not have to evolve through the water.

I would go for the water mist and the reactor was flushed through with N2/Ar before switching on. 500w is not a lot of power which brings me to the amperage, 100 amps+- @ 5volts. I would say the amperage was measured at the reactor and not the main input (see what I posted on the Meyer thread).

Using inductive RF with a low volt input of around 5v at the cell could devolope hundreds of amps (this works), but there claim is way beyound what I can do.

The weight of H might be because it is not H2, it could be a heavier element of H, but that would be moving into the realms of nuclear reactions and I don't think it would or they might start glowing in the dark.

The last para: apart, I think there is a miss understanding of numbers, somewhere they are certainly assuming transmutation to reach those numbers, but of what? I would say certainly not the oxygen, so where has the hydrogen come from? not the water for a fact. What other molecules are they using which contain such a volume of H apart from the one litre of water???? The Oxygen, lack of, I do not have a problem with (re. SMD) it goes to oxidation of an element in an electrode and generates electrons which can be used to power part of the system "that's why there is only 500w consumed, maybe" and a good possibility to go OU on energy value

Just my musings for today

regards

Mike

Inspiration

#5 ·

tachyon wrote:

Hi , pure graphene is conductive , graphene oxide isn't conductive until you reduce it. He probably uses reduced GO as the IR absorber.. are there any other transparent IR absorbers? I am interested in this.
Correct, but at the time he didn't want to give away trade secrets, but yes GO is an insulator until reduced with hydrogen, the oxygen and hydrogen join together and form water (a hydrogen cell). The conductivity also depends on the number of sheets in the layers (1 atom), more layers the less conductive, but normal practical number of layers is between 5 and 8 and is like a semi conductor, hence the big interest for the electronics industry.

Mike

Inspiration

#2 ·

RAMSET wrote:

The Future of Free Energy is here now! The end of oil, coal and nuclear pollution! - YouTube

One of our friends sent this to me today,if he wants to comment??

However,ALL comments welcome!!

Thx
Chet
Hi Chet

Well he talks well, but the future is not "here now" yet. There is still a lot to do and the transparent sheet he held up was graphene on a substrate, not just graphene. The more layers of graphene the darker it gets, with just a few layers it has a yellow tinge to it and will conduct electricity very well, if it is reduced with hydrogen in one way or other, a lot use hydrozene for this. If it is not reduced it is more like an insulator.

Well you know where I am with this

Mike

Joseph Papp, Air Inert Gas Design, by Heinz Klostermann

#11 ·

vrand wrote:

Yes, Mechanical & Electrical Engineer Mark Hugo also does a great job in explaining how the 20-30% gasoline saving in cars with HHO/oxyhydrogen gas being reported worldwide, using the "cold fusion" nuclear processes theories of Fisher, Oriani, McKubre, Storms and many others over the past 24 years.

Here is John Fisher interesting theory:

OUTLINE OF POLYNEUTRON THEORY
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...57700187,d.cGE

What is needed is a working "free energy" device to power our homes and cars.

Cheers

Corrected Mark Hugo's background experience, and here is his resume:
Hugo Resume Onward
Thanks for the paper, with you around it's like having a librarian on hand

Mike

Joseph Papp, Air Inert Gas Design, by Heinz Klostermann

#9 ·

Excellent

vrand wrote:

Mark Hugo in this video says that Papp is electrolyzing the water.



Mark Hugo demonstrates how HHO may be a nuclear process involving cold fusion, and may also be the force responsible for the Papp Engine.

It's Not HHO: Cold Fusion & The Papp Engine - YouTube

It looks like there are a lot of processes happening in the simple Papp design.

Cheers
Thank you for posting this video, it brings together what I have been saying for many years here, an excellent explination.

Mike

Joseph Papp, Air Inert Gas Design, by Heinz Klostermann

#3 ·

vrand wrote:

At the 8 min. mark in the 20 min. video they show the launching of a 1.1 lb. 3" X 3" stainless steel cylinder, with lots of force, igniting just air.

Cool demonstration of the high power from HV pulses igniting just air, no noble gases or radioactive elements needed
Cheers
Not quite the case. If the air inside was at zero humidity you would not see this force, do I need to explain further!!

Now I wonder who was doing this before

Mike

Cold ammonia

#2 ·

Your secound image is very good, do you know how close this is to an e-beam reactor

Mike

Centraflow Systems

#7 ·

Just seen the post AC

Allcanadian wrote:

@Mike
That's very interesting stuff and I was performing experiments with an almost identical setup about six years ago. You may have noticed there is still a potential on the plates as well, that is in some sense we can see this in the same light as a motor/generator function. The source Emf determines the function, above a motor below a generator, thus the plates can and will generate gasses however they can cyclically be discharged to another energy sink. You will find that the plates can be charged to one potential then a period of time can pass until the generation of gasses cease then the plates can be discharged. In which case as always the line becomes blurred, is it a electrolytic cell or is it a battery or is it both or neither?.

You are on the right track in my opinion and Stiffler had a setup which I had also discovered at around the same time concerning energy recycling.
Maybe I should have followed through, lol, I tend to prove a technology and move on however I can't help but think there is more to this than meets the eye. In any case standard electrolysis is definitely a lesson in what not to do and is the poorest possible way of generating hydrogen in my opinion.

AC
Hi AC

sorry but just seen the post, with all that is going on I have not checked this thread.

Well Dr. Stifflers work and mine in places do cross paths. His electron recovery I do the same in SMD electrolysis, which is electrolysis but very efficient, about 85% over Faraday, which brings it into an ecconomical way to produce hydrogen.

The other way is using electron beam tech: and NO it is not electrolysis, if you read my paper on electrolytic cells you will see why.

With SMD I will be giving circuits and cell configuration in the near future for those who want to replicate, also detail on different gases other than just hydrogen and oxygen.

SMD electrolysis will produce the equivalent amount of gas as an efficient direct electrolysis but at "half the energy cost", so more cells = more gas and not SMD produces more gas, I just thought I would get that straight before someone asks, "JUST SCALE IT UP".

Mike

I�ve had enough of this crap!

#13 ·

Look for this

The three electrodes are SS 316, but note the colour change as it is working, and see the ring of carbon black that has fallen to the bottom of the center electrode. This is SMD as I call it and the gases produced are hydrocarbons.

MIke

I�ve had enough of this crap!

#9 ·

Why don't you ask

Hi Duncan, why don't you ask me, look on my web site and see the video showing this WITHOUT THE ARC and heavey current. No carbon electrodes either, the carbon comes from CO2 in the form of carbon black, you can see it in my video, not all the carbon is converted into a hydrocarbon gas, the excess falls to the bottom.

This still needs work on it but should be a viable system in the future, just needs more investment and my time.

Look very hard at the video as to what is happening.

Mike

Centraflow Systems

#5 ·

Thank you

pmazz850 wrote:

Hi Michael,
Is it possible to see a better picture of the e-beam reactor as some of the text is hard to read. Interesting tech. And i wish you much luck in your efforts with this!
Regards!
The system works, just a little hard to get the mix right on a small scale at a low price. The ratio of gases need to be right and when we get into flow control valves things start to become more complicated price wise. But I am working on that little by little and will get there in the end.

Mike

Centraflow Systems

#1 ·

I have updated my site, Electrolytic cells and SMD electrolysis

Puesta%20de%20sol.jpg
centraflow systems, water molecule breaking, RF water splitting, micro fuel from water and air, none hydrolysis of water.


As and when I have things completed, I will post here future updates.

Here in Spain I am trying to set up a co operative to build parts for systems, these will be for sale at a price only sufficient to pay the member workers of the co operative and the overheads, "no fat cats here".

Here in Spain we have around 25% unemployement and rising. I think most will have seen what has been going on here in the news, I call it blood and pilage, we are going back into the dark ages, it is not good at all. In my local village the council has offered an industrial unit free of charge so as to get some people in the village back to work.

If I can get together a few new energy systems, be it mine or others, that can be built here, then we can all benifit, jobs for some, products at prices that people can afford, and helpful products for third world countries. This will be owned by all that work in the business,60%, and any investors up to a maximum of 40% so as the control is always with the co operative, the workers will only benifit from the profit of products.

Mike

My work

#9 ·

Farmhand wrote:

Hi Michael, I'm interested to know how Audi got to see your work to base their
tech on it. Were you working for them or did they find it in public ?

Cheers
I was working a few years back with another person whom has dropped out of site, that could be the fountain of information, or it could be the various entries into my computor at the time. I really do not know.

It could also be certain people on this forum, I am not saying it is, I just do not know, I have been quite open for some time of the basics of how it is done, a good engineer would be able to put together a lot of it as the system is very old but with an ultra modern twist.

Anyway I am not looking for a lot of money, just sufficient to live on and pay the bills. My life has taken a sharp turn in this last year and so my mental state is not as it was, I am just fedup with sales pitch of a lot of money but give us a little information first, I have all the costs and they take no risks but want all the benifit.

Keep an eye on my web site, I will be launching an improved electrolysis system first which is 185%, "100% is faraday" efficient. E-beam is more of an industrial system but SMD as I call it will be for sale to all as a home energy factory and if driven by solar or wind, it will be 100% free.

Mike

My work

#1 ·

Thought I would post this video, it is based on my work, but like all these big companies they steal peoples work knowing you can not afford to sue them.

Well to put one over on them, soon there will be a convertion system on the market for any car or home energy generation. Low energy input synthetic methane production.

enjoy

Mike

Audi A3 TCNG e-gas project - balanced mobility - YouTube

Theory of Superunification examines a cold fusion as a basic source of heat in the 21

#6 ·

Vladimir_Leonov wrote:

In book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", Kuhn argued that science does not progress via a linear accumulation of new knowledge, but undergoes periodic revolutions, also called "paradigm shifts" in which the nature of scientific inquiry within a particular field is abruptly transformed.

This process has the cyclical nature. Time of cycle (Kondratieff long waves) for scientific and technical revolution is 50 ... 60 years.

Einstein's relativity theory and quantum theory are generated at the beginning of the 20th century.

The atomic bomb, a laser, a semiconductors have been created in the mid-20th century.

Which the scientific revolution occurred at the beginning of the 21st century?

The 21st century is no exception for change the scientific paradigm that took place in the theory of Superunification:

Leonov V. S. Quantum Energetics. Volume 1. Theory of Superunification.
Cambridge International Science Publishing, 2010, 745 pages.
Blogger: User Profile: Leonov
Theory of Superunification

V.S. Leonov. Quantum Energetics : Theory of Superunification.
Viva Books, India, 2011, 732 p.
Quantum EnergeticsCold Fusion: Priority of Usherenko (1974) in the region of cold fusion (synthesis)

Unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics occurred in 1996
LHC results cast doubt on supersymmetry theory

Finally, the discovery of Rossi and his E-cat became yet another confirmation that the new scientific and technological revolution was accomplished.

Free Energy Truth - eCat News Andrea Rossi e-Cat: E-Catalyzer Andrea Rossi Videos
eCat Now! – Rossi eCat News | eCat / Andrea Rossi eCat News Service

The theory of Superunification integrates gravity, electromagnetism and nuclear and electroweak forces from unified positions. The structure of elementary particles and the nature of the atomic nucleus have become known to scientists. We have various options for overcoming the electrostatic barrier of the protons. The processes taking place in the apparatus Rossi are no secret to me.

Rossi deserves the award of the Nobel Prize next year in compliance with the testament of the Nobel.

Sincerely
PhDr. Vladimir Leonov
Welcome Dr. Vladimir, I completly agree with what you have said apart from the time scale, it is a bit up in the air as far as the future is concerned.

Rossi is a brave man, but I wonder how long it will take for the important components of his reactor to be heavily labled as dangerous and illegal to be used in this way, eg: the making of explosives with simple off the shelf chemicals is illegal, without a licence, and you will be deemed a terrorist if they want, imprisonment without trial, they being whoever pulls the strings at that time.

I see the military "US" are or have bought several of Rossi's reactors for trials, I am sure they will find something to stamp on them that they are illegal for public use, we will see.

M.J.Nunnerley Bsc. (Mike for short in this club)