jibbguy

DePalma's old partner?

Interesting, nice find .

This appears to be the Indian professor who was working with Bruce DePalma in the past. I remember he had a replication of DePalma's "N-Machine" generator that he had claimed in a vid was working at OU at least 10 years ago.

Wherever it comes from, let's hope it makes it to market!! But the info on this page looks pretty dated.

India may not be a good country to get this stuff out in. Like many, it appears to be in thrall to the International Monetary Fund / World Bank who are reported to require in secret riders on the loans given to these countries that they do not allow any technologies to seriously compete with oil or coal.

Lasers are very dangerous

HHoEx, You could probably use the laser from an old junk optical drive like a CDROM. There were some YouTubes of this going around, but i won't link them because of the EXTREME DANGER to eyesight that these lasers represent. I only mention them to u because you seem like a responsible and wise person who would not risk your or other's eyesight with mis-using them.

It was calculated that less than 10 mS (.01 seconds) are all that is needed to fry your cornea PERMANENTLY with these CDROM lasers (...they are quite strong, and compact). So PLEASE be extra-careful!! Sun glasses won't save you from them, either (a welding hood might, but i doubt it). "Back-scatter" from them can be dangerous, too.

I worked with barcode scanning lasers for several years. I and others in the industry i know had to have cataract surgery (lol i was in my early 40's at the time).... So even "scatter" from low-power lasers like supermarket or warehouse barcode scanners can be dangerous to the eyes. The surgery is minor, one day out-patient, but its no joke and costs over $12,000 per eye to have done. It's a real drag to have to use reading glasses for close work now; when before my eyesight was always "20/20" (most peeps who have them cannot make their artificial lenses bend enough for near-focusing).

Btw, if you suspect u may have cataracts, find a microscope and look into it: They will appear reflected back to u as a "hairball" or "amoeba" kind of blob. The incidences of cataracts have apparently grown over 10 times in the last 25 years.

Low Energy Nuclear Reactions = LENR = "Cold Fusion"

The "My Reproduction" comment was from Dr. Eugene Mallove... Who was a distinguished scientist and engineer before his murder 4 years ago. So his ideas of what's "easy" to achieve in a highly controlled experiment are not quite the same as ours i suspect

From all what i have seen about this, it is NOT very easy for a layman to do at home, and getting a hold of the parts, materials, and chemicals needed could be difficult. The vessels need to be of certain design, the electrodes are exotic and presumably very expensive. Sometimes they use Deuterium-enriched water as well to increase the reaction. Lol, i read that the one company in France that is producing "kits" to do the experiment for universities and private labs is charging over $200k .

Also, besides the Abnormal Glow phenomena there is little in the proper results that can be called "spectacular"; so it would be difficult to measure the results accurately to tell if it was a success or not. Without a spectrometer you cannot detect the trace elements that were created; and the heat generation is still rather small in comparison to a non-LENR reaction using the same electrical current heating means; so exacting and very precise measurement is required.

But that doesn't mean that a University physics lab couldn't handle it fine; or that it doesn't have great potential for the future!!

I think a more productive move for us would be to start petitioning our major universities here in the U.S to ask them why they continue to refuse to study this phenomena... As Dr. Mallove did before his death.

The thing that gets me about LENR is that it really could be more of a Biophysics study than general Physics or nuclear physics. After all, we have known since the 1950's that our bodies, and those of all plants and animals, use LENR or something like it at the cellular level to transmute elements.

It could be that this aspect of it, transmutation, is the reason LENR is being suppressed here. And in this, LENR has something in common with Brown's Gas: Which also has transmuting and "de-radiating" abilities (treating radioactive materials with a hydroxy flame has been shown to remove over 90% of the radiation); just as radioactive materials in close proximity to operating LENR electrodes can lose their radioactivity. So imo, there is a strong but poorly-understood link between the strange effects of Brown's Gas flames and LENR.

I believe that meth cannot be made without a Fractional Distiller set-up.... 10 times more complex than an electrolyzer. So tying hydroxy to it is rather tenuous and shouldn't hold up in court.

i don't think Christie is a scammer

Yes, there is rarely anything "black" or white" in my experience, everything comes in 256 shades of gray

Good luck getting in contact with him and his partner, M8... It is time they made some more statements and got some more info out there. As you have said in the past (and wisely so), these inventors are usually their own worst enemy. Unfortunately, the technology is so closely rapped-up with their personal credibility so that whatever human failings they may have can be the perfect excuse to discount the validity of it all. But when you consider that objectively, that is silly: The worst jerk on the planet COULD invent the perfect free energy device (lol and some think that has happened already ).

I just hope that they really haven't "sold out". But under an implied or real serious threat to limb and family... What would each of us do? It is hard to judge others until we walk that walk. And with such a possible scenario, would it not be the threateners who are the bad guys, and the inventors the victims?

"Selling out" has one possible positive aspect: If a corporation would spend millions to shelve something, it must be of worth. Positive proof of such a sell out would at least point the way for more Open Source study to replicate. Remember: Any corp that shelves a major breakthrough would commit public relations "suicide" by suing someone for patent infringement

Now it comes down to fake Legalese...

Lol, i have been wondering for months what the heck that means anyway: "Transfer of Technology"?

a) We got caught lying about our findings, and are now being sued by everyone within shouting and fist-shaking distance of this debacle.

b) We sold out and took the $10 Mil from Exxon... Eh, sorry world: My wife's been nagging me for a new stick-built house ever since her sister got one, my mistress is complaining about how cheap I am, and I've always wanted a new Corvette. Besides, they never would of let us actually market this technology anyway.

c) We are trying to head-off serious patent infringement claims by merging with the other patent holder's company... But two egos this large cannot possibly exist within 1000 KM of each other without nuclear-like detonation.

d) The Pleidean aliens that gave us the technology in the first place decided we weren't worthy after-all, and refuse to help anymore... So we gotta complete it ourselves. Eh, can any of you guys explain to us how to use these darn oscilloscopes anyway?? (jk)

Thx for the info, i signed up there and watched a great free vid by David Ickes about "Big Brother"... If you look at that get the popcorn out it's a long one, but well worth it

Inventor is resisting going OS with it.

@Ash, I contacted the guy a few days ago when he first posted on the Hydroxy group and suggested he work with you and Panacea... Or at least publish everything on here or the O-U site and let people replicate it. He replied the next day that he would rather get "as close" to Open Source as he can without actually going that way. So he appears willing to collaborate to some degree. I pointed out that he can:

1) Get "free R&D" from the replicators who could possible improve on the design, and can also...

2) Help provide proof for his claims with working replications, maybe even with meaningful independent testing. While...

3) Still protecting his rights, and

4) Providing him the "security of numbers".

...It would seem to be a "no brainer" imo

And i wished him well, and hoped that if he went it alone he would be the FIRST out of hundreds to succeed into the mainstream that way (...stealing your thunder there on those points, m8... Sry, i hope you don't mind hehehe)... And darn good point they are!!

Am i becoming a loudmouth busybody? Certainly, lol. But i learned in my political activism "career" that this is the way to get things done in terms of affecting opinion... Maybe not the "best" way but one that is highly effective (...if not also highly irritating sometimes, hehehe). Call it "constructive egomania" if you like

Jib