Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

ewizard

46 posts · 3 threads started · 395 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Jan 2010 and May 2021

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Nice work. Now that I'm seeing some pictures and some examples of how you innovate (I noticed the rubber plumbing 4" to 2" ? pipe adapter) and your box of wiring and switches your self running generator in the other thread seems even more real. For a minute there seeing that box of switches I flashed back to thinking I was looking at John Titor's Time travel controls.

Did you use a pre-built PWM unit or build your own? Frequency? Right now I'm looking at George Wiseman's gas vaporization plans (which I bought) as he says it is even more efficient than using HHO to supplement gas. But of course not more cost efficient than running off pure water with no gas.

History Help Needed

#13 ·

I did some more digging. I may be on to something for you Matt. I'll know in a few minutes as it's either a very big download or a very slow one. It's a book that covers history of Water powered cars and it has info on what they say is the first water powered car in 1908. I have the impression this is a PDF of images of the book so probably not directly searchable. Hopefully it will have some info of value.

Well darn I can't see any such picture. It is images so not directly searchable but I went through about the first half well into the 1940's plus as it's a history of water cars in chronological order. Closest was the one already mentioned of Frazer in 1916 and this book does show copies of many patents. If you want it here's where to get it - slow download though - about 15 minutes with DSL : http://79.170.40.49/watercar.ch/lich..._into_fuel.pdf

Book is by author James A. Robey.

wantomake wrote:

Hi aaron5120,
Can one use graphite based lubricant from Home Depot to do some small experiments? I have limited access and knowledge of phosphoric acid, so was thinking of anything simple to use.

thanks,
wantomake
Be extremely careful with stronger forms of phosphoric acid as it's as strong or stronger than some of the strongest acids like sulfuric, hydrochloric and nitric acids. As I recall from college chemistry lab work we were warned it was more dangerous than any of the other 3 mentioned here.

Amplification of Energy

#5 ·

Your average rail car can hold 125 tons or thereabouts. An 18 wheeler with an extra set of axles like an overload trailer would have could even do 26 tons with no problem.

Atomic Deuterium

#3 ·

Is that for your plasma device? Is it for creating energy and if so what kind of power do you thing it will be capable of?
How they went wrong - Inventors

Also somewhere around here or overunity.com is info you can check thoroughly which is a memo from the U.S. Patent office to employees of the U.S.Patent Office about seizing any 'free energy' device (not the exact wording but essentially it) patent applications. I can't remember the wording at the moment but it's scary. No conspiracy with that - it's verifiable fact. Batteries like this have been known for some time and I know one very smart inventor who has verified they are real but knows they won't be allowed any time soon.
Yes things are looking very good with the Kapanadze device after stivep visited Tariel. I think they've got it finally. 10 watts in with 1000 watts out sounds great! Quite a few people on overunity.com are building replications based on the latest info. I haven't checked there for a couple days but the site was down yesterday. Seems fine now.

BTW that latest video was hard to follow as far as I got and then it quit half way through with an error from youtube. Might want to save this one as Wesley suggested.

BTW posted this message before Joit or MonsierM but I guess this forum was down a while as I came back to see my message didn't post.
I saw a video some 10 or 12 years ago by Dr. Masaru Emoto of the effects on water caused by different human emotions, prayer and even just symbols put on a bottle of water. The crystals formed from these waters (think snow flake) is very much influenced by those things. I suggest doing the prayer Peter has posted and doing it with the technique of imagining and feeling that the water has already been brought back to it's pure and clean state.
Unfortunately from what I heard before he's not open sourcing. I think him and Doug Konzen tried to get a deal with some car company (volvo ?) but they got bamboozled and Vovlo didn't do as they said they would. This was some time ago and things may not have been as far along as they are now. My biggest concern for Ismael is somoene will show up and either buy him off or bury it somehow and that puts him in a dangerous situation unless he has a lot of people with backup information on how to build it and it's made accessible if anything bad happens. Open source is the best and safest thing. As I have said before I think it's easier to build a free energy or overunity device than it is to get it into the hands of the public.
Way cool! I was thinking I hadn't heard anything he was doing in quite a while.

One odd thing on the first video which says it is 14 minutes. It quits at 4:01 minutes. Won't go past that. Is that just my experience or is it actually end just after 4 minutes?
Edit: I guess it was just my other computer or a hickup at youtube. I'm getting past 4:01 now.
cifta, Thanks! I agree it's better to hear from someone you know is real rather than a testimonial on a product sale page. I did write Cerma and got a reply back answering my question also.
cifta, thanks for the pro opinion. I usually don't buy into these kinds of 'oil additives' but I'm thinking about this one. My one question is whether you do this treatment once or do you have to add it each time you do an oil change?
That circuit looks a lot like one form kooler on ou forum he posted and also one he sent me in a PM. It's something loosely related to the TPU. I believe he was getting some noteworthy effects from it. I think he mentioned it is difficult to tune.
CNN had an article today about a device being built at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory that is going to try nuclear fusion with a laser the size of 3 football fields. They are saying it will be a miniature star. And what they will produce if all goes well will be only 5 microns diameter and last only 200 trillionths of a second after it's ignited. I can't believe we as taxpayers are having to fund such nonsense. Even the article says there are a lot of skeptics on this and even if it works that it would not be viable or an affordable way to produce energy. This has been under construction since 1997 and is still not expected to be ready until late 2012! Article here:
Can world's largest laser zap Earth's energy woes? - CNN.com

If even a tiny fraction of this money was given to some of the researchers I know of I think we would have a much better alternate energy source by now. But of course it would not be a centralized power source and so no control of the people.
I thought a Leyden jar was essentially like a big capacitor that can store high voltage but is not a source of continuous heavy current like you might need for powering an inverter and running household devices. I could be wrong but I think with a Leyden jar you are going to have very short term storage of voltage.

I can't currently afford a Bedini charger like the ones he sells but I'm trying to get some ideas of the best way to build something similar so I can salvage car, marine or golf cart batteries. As far as I know used batteries are probably going to be cheaper than building your own.
Really excellent insights and thoughts jibbguy! I do hope it works out to raise public awareness on this. The one bad thing is the public is going to think it takes a real rocket scientist (which this guy was) to come up with anything that works. So any backyard inventors may still have a hard time getting things going for that reason as well as the PTB and factions that don't want to loose control of their gross income stream.
Interesting and I see it as good in some ways but it still ties people to purchasing fuel which in this case will be natural gas most likely (although other fuels like hydrogen and others were mentioned) which then puts natural gas in bigger demand and if the price goes up (which it did a huge amount when gasoline prices were over $4 a gallon) people buying this tech may find themselves paying more than for traditional electricity IMO. Bottom line is you are still tied to buying a fuel that is limited in supply. Eventually the fuel will become more scarce and price will go up.