Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

ewizard

46 posts · 3 threads started · 395 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Jan 2010 and May 2021

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Slovenia wrote:

Hi Ewizard,

Would you supply me with a link to that Tesla paper you referred to? I am not finding it. Thanks.

Best Regards,
Slovenia
I've actually got two books - one is 'The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Martin published 1894 (about 38 Megabytes) and the other is Tesla Colorado Springs Notes 1899-1900 published in 1978 by the Tesla Museum in Beograd, Yugoslavia (84 Megabytes). I'm putting them up on Rapidshare.com. I don't think these are copyrighted as I don't see any copyrights. I got them off the Internet but forget where they came from. I'll post the links here as soon as the uploads are done.

Ok - here's the first one:
RapidShare: 1-CLICK Web hosting - Easy Filehosting

MD5: 7010558FDF44693DBC060F8D06E395E9

Here is the 2nd one:
RapidShare: 1-CLICK Web hosting - Easy Filehosting

MD5: FAFC34B4FF4FC5307E6A15005DC54206
Slovenia thanks for bringing up this discussion. Have you scanned through the big Tesla paper that someone put up recently (about 80 Megabytes) ? It seems most of Tesla's notes were in there I believe. Unfortunately I think it was image scans rather than text so it's not searchable with a PDF text search engine.

Was this the device likely used by Tesla to power the Pearce-Arrow car?
This is interesting to see Gates now focusing on Energy. At least one alternative energy researcher I know says he has a a way to convert spent nuclear fuel to safe material and create energy in the process as Gates talked about:
Long Beach, California (CNN) -- Microsoft Corp. founder and philanthropist Bill Gates on Friday called on the world's tech community to find a way to turn spent nuclear fuel into cheap, clean energy.

"What we're going to have to do at a global scale is create a new system," Gates said in a speech at the TED Conference in Long Beach, California. "So we need energy miracles."

Gates called climate change the world's most vexing problem, and added that finding a cheap and clean energy source is more important than creating new vaccines and improving farming techniques, causes into which he has invested billion of dollars.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation last month pledged $10 billion to help deploy and develop vaccines for children in the developing world.

The world must eliminate all of its carbon emissions and cut energy costs in half in order to prevent a climate catastrophe, which will hit the world's poor hardest, he said.

"We have to drive full speed and get a miracle in a pretty tight timeline," he said.

Gates said the deadline for the world to cut all of its carbon emissions is 2050. He suggested that researchers spend the next 20 years inventing and perfecting clean-energy technologies, and then the next 20 years implementing them.

The world's energy portfolio should not include coal or natural gas, he said, and must include carbon capture and storage technology as well as nuclear, wind and both solar photovoltaics and solar thermal power.

"We're going to have to work on each of these five [areas] and we can't give up on any of them because they look daunting," he said. "They all have significant challenges."

Gates spent a significant portion of his speech highlighting nuclear technology that would turn spent uranium -- the 99 percent of uranium rods that aren't burned in current nuclear power plants -- into electricity.

That technology could power the world indefinitely; spent uranium supplies in the U.S. alone could power the country for 100 years, he said.

A "traveling wave reactor" would burn uranium waste slowly, meaning a 60-year supply could be added to a reactor at once and then not touched for decades, he said.

Gates also called for innovation in battery technology.

"All the batteries we make now could store less than 10 minutes of all the energy [in the world]," he said. "So, in fact, we need a big breakthrough here. Something that's going to be of a factor of 100 better than what we have now."

Gates called for more investment in climate-related technology. He said he is backing a company called TerraPower, which is working on an alternate form of nuclear technology that uses spent fuel.

Money that goes into research and development will pay bigger returns than other investments, he said, especially if money goes into energy sources that will be cheap enough for the developing world to afford.

Clean energy technologies must be installed in poorer countries as they develop, he said.

"You'd be stunned at the ridiculously low costs of innovation," said Gates, who received a standing ovation for his remarks.

If he could wish for anything in the world, Gates said he would not pick the next 50 years' worth of presidents or wish for a miracle vaccine.

He would choose energy that is half as expensive as coal and doesn't warm the planet.

Announcement.

#3 ·



But I suggest you delete your entire post, put your info into as many hands as you can (with those you trust with directions to post it everywhere if anything should happen) and wait until you are ready to release all details - then post it far and wide. I fear especially with a direct oil based replacement you might get a visit from people you do not want to know. Be smart - be safe and do everything you can to make sure this info is not lost.

Who's controlling us?

#2 ·

There is a lot of truth there. I think it is important to ask ourselves if a concept is worth 'proving' if it can have no practical use. Why build a device if it can only power one LED and cannot be scaled up. I have no problem with building such devices if it is probable they can be scaled up or even for the fun of demonstrating something like Zero Point energy but we need to focus now on things that can be useful for home power and transportation power.

I have followed one researcher for many years and I do see some reasons why he would not want to circulate a file with complete details on his concept or device. It comes down to wanting either money for it or wanting the credit for the research. It's very easy for a wealthy interest or company to take such info if they should get it and redo it just enough to call it their own. Then they build a device and make the money and get the name or credit. Or at least I believe that is the fear of those people who may have working concepts. That and the threat of the PTB.

I remember reading the rather unusual situation of Bedini thanking people for giving him a hard time and saying his device didn't work or couldn't produce OU. He said because of that he was finally left alone or something to that effect and the PTB figured he had been discredited enough that people would not waste time on his devices.

I do have word that one researcher will be soon releasing such info. There is also Greer who says they will have something by this April - not sure if that is proof of concept or something to actually sell. I won't hold my breath for that but we can hope. Good topic...
Look at the URL and the folder it's in www. thinkgeek.com/stuff/looflirpa/zero.shtml<--- SEE that looflirpa ? What's that spell backwards? AprilFool - So NO I'm sure this one isn't real.