The patents and their transcriptions, four forums, the bench notes and the glossary — one
index, ranked together, so a claim in a patent and the thread arguing about it come back side
by side.
three of Issue 3 Winter-Spring 86/87, there is a picture of a resonant cavity. What is thelikely diameter? Quick Analysis For this analysis, it was determined
by Stans progress, his finial developments were for modular stackable self contained resonant cavity units, and then water fuel injectors, these two systems are the final
this effect is paralleled in Meyer's process The statement "As understood in resonant cavities of an electron nature..." is a direct reference to "Multipactor" action...if
If you read this patent paper, all you need is this mechanical sphere and a squarewave generator that delivers pulses till 50V......... And then you have a working resonant cavity.
my other username. In Stan's early WFC work he made a Spherical Resonant Cavity to study the phenomenon he called 'Resonant Action'. Patents on the Spherical
I just checked and the speed of light is about 3/4 of what it is in a vacuum. (2.25E8). So that's the fraction we need to base our resonance comparison on. And this also refutes the video's explanation of a sparking grap
That's a better video than the other one I saw. The key point is the wavelength in water is about one tenth of what it is in air. But they still don't understand what's going on. The effect isn't based on heat - it's cau
Thats nice....are you familiar with envelope detector curcuits and why they are used? With this spherical cell...the patent plainly says water but doesn't a gas seem more logical ? I was pretty sure Samuel Leach had a pa