Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Search

Everything at once

The patents and their transcriptions, four forums, the bench notes and the glossary — one index, ranked together, so a claim in a patent and the thread arguing about it come back side by side.

12 results for “resonant cavity” · 6ms

Forum post

Re: Resonant Cavity - The truth about amp loading! - Discussion

Resonant Cavity - The truth about amp loading! - Discussion · X-Blade · IonizationX · 2016

There is no proof or evidence about this. No one tested the VIC and cell from the dune buggy. If it draws almost nothing what can explain the lm317 coupled to 2n3055 in each VIC card for the amplitude regulation? Thats a

Forum post

Re: Resonant Cavity - The truth about amp loading! - Discussion

Resonant Cavity - The truth about amp loading! - Discussion · X-Blade · IonizationX

Yes your point of view is correct, but i belive that minimum current Stan stated is across the cell, even at 0.025A over 2KV will draw 50W that represent a primary load of 4.17A @ 12V. But some people used to say that th

Forum post

Re: the VIC

the VIC · X-Blade · IonizationX

test evaluation report" as on some patents, voltages from 13v and higher (Resonant Cavity (Interfacing) ) Look into US4798661