Step charging accumulation
Does the cell voltage climb over a gated pulse train, or fall back between pulses?
- U
- Voltage after the burst, V
- v
- Volts per pulse, V
- n
- Pulses
- p
- Pulse period, µs
- T
- Time constant, µs
- r
- Retention per pulse
- R
- Leakage resistance, kΩ
- C
- Cell capacitance, nF
LaTeX
T = R \cdot C \qquad r = e^{-p/T} \qquad U = v \cdot \frac{1 - r^{n}}{1 - r}
Method
- Multiply the leakage resistance by the cell capacitance for the discharge time constant. In SI: ohms times farads gives seconds.
- Divide the pulse period by that time constant and take e to the minus that. The result is the fraction of the accumulated voltage still there when the next pulse arrives — the retention.
- The staircase is then a geometric series: each pulse adds its own volts and keeps the retained fraction of everything before it. Summing n terms gives v × (1 − rⁿ) ÷ (1 − r).
- Compare that against n × v, which is what perfect retention would give. The ratio is how much of the intended accumulation actually survives.
- If the retention is close to 1, the series is nearly linear and the staircase climbs as intended. If it is well below 1, the sum converges on v ÷ (1 − r) and adding more pulses achieves nothing.
Assumptions
- The cell is a capacitor with a resistor across it. It is not: water’s effective resistance depends on frequency and on the field across it, so the leakage during a high-voltage pulse is not the leakage measured with a meter.
- Each pulse deposits the same increment regardless of the voltage already present. In a real circuit the increment falls as the cell voltage approaches the drive voltage, so this overstates the top of the staircase.
- The blocking path is perfect during the gate-off period. A real diode or choke leaks, and that leakage adds to the water’s.
- No breakdown. If the accumulated voltage takes the field past what the gap will hold, the cell discharges through an arc and the staircase resets — which this arithmetic will not show.
- This is a derived model, not a formula from Meyer’s filings. The claim taken from the patents is that gating allows accumulation; the geometric series is the ordinary consequence of an RC discharge between pulses.