Coaxial cell capacitance
What is the capacitance of a tube-in-tube cell with water between the walls?
- C
- Capacitance, F
- ε
- Relative permittivity of the water
- l
- Overlapping length, in
- b
- Outer diameter, in
- a
- Inner diameter, in
LaTeX
C = \frac{2\pi\varepsilon_0 \cdot ε \cdot l}{\ln\!\left(b / a\right)}
Method
- Convert the diameters and the length from inches to metres. The formula is in SI and one inch is exactly 0.0254 m.
- Find the water’s relative permittivity at 20 °C from its type, then adjust it for temperature — about 0.4 % lower per degree above 20 °C.
- Take the natural logarithm of the ratio of the diameters. Because it is a ratio, using radii instead of diameters gives the same answer; using the gap instead does not.
- Multiply 2π by the permittivity of free space (8.854 × 10⁻¹² F/m), by the relative permittivity, and by the overlapping length.
- Divide by the logarithm. The result is in farads; for a cell of these dimensions expect hundreds of picofarads to a few nanofarads.
Assumptions
- The electrodes are perfectly concentric and the whole overlapping length is submerged. A tube sitting off-centre has a higher capacitance than this, because the close side contributes more than the far side loses.
- End effects are ignored. The field bulges outward past the ends of the electrodes, which adds a little capacitance — negligible for a long cell, not for a short one.
- The water is a pure dielectric. It is not: it conducts, and above a few kilohertz the loss is significant. This gives the capacitance, not the impedance — see the Cole-Cole calculation.
- No gas is present. Bubbles on the plates displace water with something whose permittivity is 1 rather than 80, so a cell in full production has measurably less capacitance than a still one.
- The permittivity is the static value. Water holds ~80 all the way up through the megahertz range, so this is safe for any VIC frequency.