Engines running on 100 % hho
Started by unknown · · 45 posts · last reply 25 October 2018
-
#26 · date not recorded
The only thing that is true is that you can choose to use voltage with low current and pay the price, low efficiency.
Thats why Meyer said that cant disprove the "mode of operation using voltage potential".
Do the math, idiot... -
#27 · date not recorded
I have no interest in talking with an idiot, please fuck off and die. You are living a useless life.
-
#28 · date not recorded
I can tell you, idiot, that alternator demo MMW was near to 3.
Do some homework and dont believe in Santa... -
#29 · date not recorded
You are a Jerk and childish.
If you were a serious man you start to check this numbers.
-
#30 · date not recorded
Steve , can you just delete this thread and my membership too. I really tried to stir up interest in hho again. But really I have no time in my life to deal with this. This guy will do nothing to help further hho research. And now I am not interested in helping anyone anymore. -
#31 · date not recorded
Cry baby cry...
-
#32 · date not recorded
Steve already measured the amount of gas in one liter cavity with some friend.
He can tell you or you just can do the math...
P.S. I am building the alternator version -
#33 · date not recorded
X-Baby, you must have me confused with someone that gives a shit what you are saying. You are inconsequential to me. If you died today , I would not care. and by the way you carry yourself, not many would care if you died today -
#34 · date not recorded
Idiot. Go to school, learn some math then behave like a man, damn!
Who cares about your engines running on wall power? lol
-
#35 · date not recorded
Edward Mitchell was another idiot like you.
Pulling so many power to his cell, creating steam bubbles and calling it Hydrogen.
This board have that amazing scientific content...
-
#36 · date not recorded
Edward Mitchell was another idiot like you.
Pulling so many power to his cell, creating steam bubbles and calling it Hydrogen.
This board have that amazing scientific content... -
#37 ·
I wouldnt bother with it either Neal...at least here with so many guests and 2 users...its not worth the time to even log in much any more. -
#38 ·
am i not looking on the forum for a couple of days , do i see this childisch behaviour.
Please act as adults.
Thanks.
-
#39 ·
all those people who run away, i dont understand.
If you want to share yr results, then please do so.
Why run when 1 person is negative?
Dont go in discussion with him but appreciate thr good people.
Its the same on all forums, sadly enough.
New Guy, really? -
#40 · date not recorded
Hi guys.
I apologize about that, but I was sincere and a lot of people over this boards know that Ronnie said a lot of nonsense and contradictions, he was making people loose their time and money with crap theories and until today nobody saw his damn cell working.
He only wants attention and bear with me for being honest about my thinking.
It wasnt me who started do go to the level of name calling, and one advice to you all:
Dont be affraid to say what you thing about SCAMS because some people try to get advantage against the others with less knowledge about this "technology".
I will not take off any word I said about Meyer demo Cells, and about Ronnie. -
#41 ·
all those people who run away, i dont understand.
If you want to share yr results, then please do so.
Why run when 1 person is negative?
Dont go in discussion with him but appreciate thr good people.
Its the same on all forums, sadly enough.
New Guy, really?
Yea i dont appreciate the attacks on Neal and Ronnie.
Nobody has to follow anybody ,those that think they wasted time and money following anybody with this stuff wasnt in it for the right reason to begin with.
I cant speak for everyone but its really hard to want to engage with a research group with 800 guests that contributes jack shit compared with the usual 5 or 6 members.
Id suggest finding a way to get the 800 guests to engage in discussion and be a real part of the group or close ther eyes.I cant be the only one not interested in such a huge silent audience.
P.s.
Hope everybody had a nice summer and ready for the season once again
-
#42 ·
Hi guys.
I apologize about that, but I was sincere and a lot of people over this boards know that Ronnie said a lot of nonsense and contradictions, he was making people loose their time and money with crap theories and until today nobody saw his damn cell working.
He only wants attention and bear with me for being honest about my thinking.
It wasnt me who started do go to the level of name calling, and one advice to you all:
Dont be affraid to say what you thing about SCAMS because some people try to get advantage against the others with less knowledge about this "technology".
I will not take off any word I said about Meyer demo Cells, and about Ronnie.
Hi X blade,
I understand your frustrations. I really do.
I only cannot state that Ronnie or Neal or Stan are frauds, because i could not replicate their work.
We have seen videos of Stan.
It would be so much easier if Ron or Neal or somebody else from his peer group would post a video in which they show their claims.
I must say that i liked Rons explanation, in contrast to you. But thats all personal.
Cheers
-
#43 ·
The summer was great. Thanks. I became a dad for the fourth timeall those people who run away, i dont understand.
If you want to share yr results, then please do so.
Why run when 1 person is negative?
Dont go in discussion with him but appreciate thr good people.
Its the same on all forums, sadly enough.
New Guy, really?
Yea i dont appreciate the attacks on Neal and Ronnie.
Nobody has to follow anybody ,those that think they wasted time and money following anybody with this stuff wasnt in it for the right reason to begin with.
I cant speak for everyone but its really hard to want to engage with a research group with 800 guests that contributes jack shit compared with the usual 5 or 6 members.
Id suggest finding a way to get the 800 guests to engage in discussion and be a real part of the group or close ther eyes.I cant be the only one not interested in such a huge silent audience.
P.s.
Hope everybody had a nice summer and ready for the season once again
So, most of my free time is consumed by the little one. But in some weeks, i might be back on the project.
You know, many of us are frustrated by not seeing real results after putting a lot of money in the project.
Members walk away to other forums and just sneak peak here.
If you have any suggestions what to do to change that, then please let me know.
I run this forum from my hart for years. I funded it out of my own pocket.
I have seen attacks, technically and written ones.
I just wanted to create a place where we inventors / replicators can exchange info.
Not a bulley place or whatever else.
I share what i did.
I hope to inspire others as well.
But ill gues the light goes slowly out with a lot of guys....Which i understand too.
Hope you stay for a while and if you find another nice forum, please let me know....
Cheers
Steve
-
#44 ·
Edward Mitchell was another idiot like you.
Pulling so many power to his cell, creating steam bubbles and calling it Hydrogen.
This board have that amazing scientific content...
sorry Neal. You are not an idiot.
X blade` please choose other words.
For me.
thanks
Steve -
#45 · date not recorded
For
Water Fuel Engines and Power plants See
Secure Supplies
Daniel Donatelli
Those using them already thanks
Sign in to reply, or ask for an account.