HydroMorphysis

Tell me how does passing electrons through a filament consume electrons? it consumes power? But if you start thinking vacuum tube technology you then start to see a filament as a source of electrons..


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermionic_emission

I just want to bring up what I see as the main difference in the alternator vs the EPG when it comes to producing power and efficiencies..   We will never get fully way from the counter electromotive force.. But we can work to get rid of a good amount of CEMF while maintaining the same power out.. The goal of any generator is to create strong fluxuating B fields within the loops of coils.. You cannot create a rotor on a armature that has strong fluxuating magnetic fields within the loop because the loop obstructs the ability of a iron material to pass through.. So Stan came up with a way to get strong fluxing magnetic material to pass through the loops without the need of a rotor/armature by using a tubular passage to carry strong B field generating materials like iron.  So now if we think about the alternator and what the purpose of a stator core is.. i think we can consider it a magnetic field amplifier.. it allows the rotors magnetic field to induce the needed strong magnetic field fluxuations in the center of the pickup coils.. the stator core carries an excess of CEMF to be able to work. so a stator core style generator has the inherent problem of how it goes about in getting strong B field fluxuations into the center of the pickup coils.

 If you read stans EPG patent and look into the reference patents you will see a patent from batelle where they created a unit a lot like a EPG but it used solid magnetic spheres being passed through a tube with pickup coils and the magnetic spheres are being propelled by air.

I feel like timeshell is correct... You have resistance and reactance in the cell this is why it will never behave like a conventional LC tank circuit..  Its over damped cause of the existence of R in the cell.. Makes it s parallel RC circuit of sorts..
But in this case the R exist in the same space as C. they are in the same component..

When I have done test with a lcz meter on a cell it DOES NOT behave like you would want it to match the idea of parallel RC.. Its actually inversed.. You would think that as freq increased the phase angle would increase and the cell would pass more power into the reactive component and less power into the resistive component of the cell.. But based on the lcz meter this is opposite.. It shows the phase angle increases as you lower the frequency. The capacitance value of the cell increases a lot as you lower the frequency as well.. which is not normal for a pure capacitor to do.

A pure capacitor having a pure dielectric would maintain close tolerance of capacitance reading at all test freqs. Spring water does not.

The only thoughts I can come up with this situation is that this parallel RC has another feature that differs from a conventional parallel RC circuit. It is a liquid dielectric with electrolytes. This allows for things like a hemholtz layer to form on the electrode... A form of electrochemical storage of power with the ionic contaminates occurs they refer to as pseudo capacitance.

Pseudo capacitance  may be what the LCZ meter is presenting as I lowered the test frequency.. The lower frequency would allow more time for ion collection to occur at the electrodes during the test. also a false appearance of increased capacitance.

A water cell has a poor power factor.. There are losses in it from resistance but if there is a way to produce a great amount of fuel with a poor power factor that's ok because this capacitor is not just a capacitor for storing and processing power in a circuit. Its a material processor as well. Its expected to have some losses and consume energy in the production of fuel.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudocapacitor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_layer_(surface_science)