The quantum behavior of orbital electrons isn't the same as that of free electrons moving under the influence of electrical fields. Two closely spaced protons might actually pull an electron into the cancellation region, if the plasma electron temperature isn't too high. Trying to get fusion with ultra high temperature might be making the quest harder than it needs to be. I remember reading in the Bible that when the Prophet Ezekiel saw a wheel within a wheel come down from the sky, he also saw a vision of a flame infolding on itself. This is a good description of my plasmoid fusion experiment.
Still, there are Inventors who have claimed deuterium production from Hydrogen. Even the production of Helium. So, somehow, an electron is getting inside a proton at least some of the time, for neutron formation.
if the electron came close to the proton it would become a hydrogen atom or if it has enough force it can just collide and shoot photons or collide and destroy the proton but how would it suddendly enter the proton? The semiconductors electrons have a energy barrier that they can't pass but there is a possibility they will exist beyond this energy barrier so they paas the barrier without spending energy but this barrier means that the potential comes from a repulsive force , a proton and an electron have an attractive force
Why no one wants to deal with nuclear fusion which is in my opinion the only real free energy source, our Sun does it 24/7, there's nothing impossible about nuclear fusion, the only difficulty is in making a machine which can simulate the same conditions and fields as the sun,
We also have something called electron catalysis. When an electron comes between a proton and some other positive particle, the Coulomb Barrier is cancelled out. Neither high temperature nor extreme pressure is then needed for colliding particles to fuse. These electrons are found in low energy neutral plasmas which are flame like.
Never heard of that before, how does the coulomb barrier cancel out? It could happen for a certain distance and the particles would need to be aligned which is almost impossible to do in particle physics but again what would probably happen is that one of the two positive particles would grab the electron.
Why no one wants to deal with nuclear fusion which is in my opinion the only real free energy source, our Sun does it 24/7, there's nothing impossible about nuclear fusion, the only difficulty is in making a machine which can simulate the same conditions and fields as the sun, the two big contenders that use magnetic fields are the tomahawk style and polywell/fusor type machines and then there are the laser types machines, the tomahawk is nearly impossible to succeed, the polywell won't be backed up to do a full scale model and no FEM simulation can model millions of particles which alter the voltage field of this fusor style machine, I am talking about boron 13 and alpha particle fusion which require high plasma temperature aka strong forces in order to be self sustaining - the tritium fusion which most countries are trying to achieve must be mined from the Moon, so that's a no no. The polywell won't succeed because they use ribs to simulate a spherical shell that pushes the ions together like the sun's gravity and the voids between the ribs are where all the particles escape from, the tomahawk is actually creating and driving two beams of particles against each other like in a car crash which is also impossible to make since the void between each particle is way too large and the particles decelerate before they can hit a target. The laser type machines shoot a solid target with high energy laser which knocks off the ion particle and hit another target but then there are isssues with having to replenish the solid target and the limit of laser power.
A tangible solution may be a torus model similar to mobius coils for particles, an elliptical wavefront of speed c has two directions for the gravitational wave, on the one axis perpendicular to the toruses axis on the outside perimeter of the torus there's always a contraction of spacetime so the surrounding spacetime is expanded, this creates a gravitational gradient which gives rise to gravitational phenomena, the other direction is parallel to the toruses axis and gives rise to polarization patterns because of the superposition of quantum states creating B or E fields because it is intrinsic to the spin of particles, the polarization is the equivalent to flux lines. Now if gravitational waves exist then what are the properties of the spacetime medium in which they travel? The only true demand is that there has to be a baseline spacetime density, it doesn't have to be elastic or viscous but I haven't checked out the details yet.
I get all 3 fields from the right hand rule and relativity.
You can get magnetism, static electric field, and inductive field (EM wave field) from the right hand rule, it's a polarization of gravitational waves, the gravitational waves make up every elementary particle and produce interference and this is the polarization that is the magnetic field, from the magnetic field you can get all the other fields, I haven't bothered with weak force and nuclear force because these fields are still not detailed but since there is a gravity field, magnetic field, electric field, electromagnetic wave field a.k.a induction explained with this a unified field theory is possible. Superluminal magnetic field is also possible and it present everyday but it cannot be measured, it is true that magnetic flux lines are imaginary but these are the most real at the same time as the other two field static electric field and inductive electric field depends only on the relative movement of particles but the polarization is the same. In this model every particle has two QM states which describe the gravitational wave from the schrodinger equation instead of probability waves. you just replace probability with energy, the problem is that particles are said to have one qm state not two qm states, it's like combining every damn section of physics together, I ain't getting no money to do it so this hasn't been utilized, I'm sure no one will understand what I'm talking about , this demands an enormous amount of visualization and I still haven't finished with the proofs for everything. Motherfuckers are getting paid to do phds for more useless shit, I can't even get funding for some chemicals I'm developing in this corrupt shithole country, this has nothing to do with free energy, there's no such thing as free energy, you can only convert between energy, you cant get 1 from 0! I only made this post because I've already posted some shit here about this but I was wrong about the Y component for the lorrentz contraction, it was really a simple mechanism which can only be realized when observing how the interference patterns move. You can however make an advanced magnetic bottle with this so yay fusion reactors!
Imagine rotating dots on a circle, the dots are the polarization points, when a particle moves on the X axis because of relativity the dots on one side expand due to lorrentz tranformation and the dots on the other side contract, because the dots move to the top Y side the dots gain a Y component velocity, so there is a) rotation of the dots (STATIC ELECTRIC FIELD) b)when the particle moves the dots expand so the polarization is either more intense or less intense on one side (MOTIONAL MAGNETIC FIELD) c) when the particle accelerates the dots keep contracting or expanding and the dots move to the Y sides there is a Y component velocity (EM waves/induction) this relativistic effect happens for every speed v of the particle small or big
The electron spin model is entirely correct, they say the electron cant spin at speed c because the field must exceed the speed of light c but this model is correct for the energy of the electron and the energy of the gravitational waves which comprise the electron, the flux lines are the polarizations of positive and negative components of gravitational waves , can exceed speed of light c but can never be measured in our universe. The flux line is the only thing that can move higher than speed c without violating any physics law! There are no static fields as the waves keep moving , we cannot measure them as outside observers so they are only static to us until the particles start moving, this is also a relativistic phenomenon, the matter is either condensed or expanded and other matter wants to either fill or remove itself from the region so it moves to cancel everything out and reach equilibrium, the moment the last elementary particle stops moving it will be the death of our universe.
Ampere correctly assumed the flux lines as the prime mover of all fields, the solutions for the paradoxes of electromagnetism are ill-conceived only to agree with the current fashion so uni teachers can keep their fat pockets filling with cash, it's corruption everywhere.
Thanks for your video and explanation. I can see that you have spend lots of time on this. To understand with what kind / type of electricity you and me are dealing with, i have included another video. Its the old borderland video of Eric Dollard explaning the two wave forms TEM and LMD transmittion waves. TEM is electricity as you know it. Electromagnetic waves. LMD are the longitudinal waves which a Tesla coil is producing. A coil is capacitance and inductance at the same time.... Please watch this video till the end.... And again and again.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz9jdLxgbaU&feature=youtu.be
Cheers
what are longitudinal matter waves? the electron doesn't produce any magnetic field on it's axis of movement so there are no EM waves on the longitudinal axis , the EM waves come from relativistic effects and contraction/dillation happens on the axis of movement so any effect manifest perpendicular to this in the transverse direction aka EM waves