questions for those who appreciate the practical wisdom of Stanley Meyer
Started by tree Of Meraki · · 5 posts · last reply 27 October 2018
-
#1 ·
I am wondering, from the Stanley Meyer's fans that will see this, or those who know. If i am using coaxial (cocentric) tubes as the electrolysis electrodes, the harmonic oscillation of the waveform between the electrodes is slightly variable, but generally a set frequency range for the dimensions of the electrodes. But if i use instead a slightly recursive spiraling pattern to the electrode geometry, so parallel plates that are separated but spiraled similar to "jelly roll" 18650 cells. This would increase the active surface area while decrease total reaction volume in space. However, would the variable distance between the electrodes at different points cause multiple harmonic points, harder to focus in on? How would the electrical wave travel through the variable gap in such a way that oscillation is not destructive in nature. Anyone know the answer to this question? I'll end up trying both electrode configurations either way, but this is just confirmation for my understanding of the basic principles. -
#2 ·
Hi Tree,
Walt Jenkins has found and patented a better way than electrolysis. Check out the thread on his presentation here. I personally saw this demonstrated and it actually works! Included is a short video clip of this demonstration that I took and posted. http://www.energyscienceforum.com/showthread.php?t=3987 -
#3 ·
Thank you, Gary. Your reply is appreciated. -
#4 ·
-
#5 ·
Sounds like you're working with Roger Billings' methods.
Sign in to reply, or ask for an account.