Vortex

Food for thought ..

Oxygen explodes or shall we say burns very quickly, WITHOUT any fuel.
(see the video)

Is oxygen not a fuel?
What really burns then, the oxygen or the fuel?

YouTube - O2 CYLINDER EXPLOSION

A thought. Does a higher voltage diode make a difference?
Does the surface area that the light falls upon make a bigger
difference than the diode itself?
The diodes you are getting are more expensive and are an avalanche diode.
Is an Avalanche or a non-Avalanche a better diode for the experiments?
The first diode I tried tried, 1N4007 1A 1000V Rectifier Diode, created
1.5 volt and is very cheap compared to the 1n5062????

Get 100 1N4007 here for $2.00 US. International Buyer pays $2.99 for shipping. Click the Buy-Now button.

I purchased 100 1N4007 for $3.75 total, my shipping was only $1.75.

I've often pondered what word to use instead of UnderStand

Remember to ask, "By who's authority?"

Hey, you did understand that I get voltage without the diode
being exposed to the light, only the wire connected to the diode is
exposed... Right?!
Would it not follow that surface area being exposed to the light
is a factor then, also?

I tried a piss-ant JT coil I have and i don't know what i'm doing
or the current is zip/nil. It didn't seem to do anything to the
voltage.

Yes look forward to the call.. give me a heads up so i can
schedule bed time .. i do not do a schedule and am up over
24 hours a lot.

Is it a dream?

I used 4 RM2C diodes in series pulled off an old TV board,
bare wire wrapped around
the positive probe of the meter to the diodes and stuck the probe
into the middle, into the inside of a CFL. 2 volts.
Let go, do not touch the probes: 3.3 volts
To not touch the ground wire either.
Depending upon which one you touch it falsifies/effects your voltage readings.
Connect an earth ground and it jumps to 6.2 volts

Then I thought it was not good for my probe to be inside
that hot bulb, so I wrapped the bare wire around the CLF
and it started out at 6.2 and fell to 4 volts .. I don't know

Then I got to thinking .. that just isn't right. I must not
have observed it correctly. So I grab the positive probe and jammed
it inside the light bulb and let go (don't touch!)
Reading 9.9 volts.

Is this sounding crazy enough for you yet?

I ran out of same kind of diodes .. I'll look around for more.

I don't expect to get these kind of voltages from sunlight??
But but .. it would be nice......

Randy ..... hmmmm .......

The sun is down right now, so I tried a 1N4007 1A 1000V Rectifier Diode up against a CFL.
The diode had wires solder to both ends so I could expose only one side of
the diode at a time to the light.

Putting the cathode end wire against the CFL read 1.5 volts.
Putting the anode end wire against the CFL read 0.45 volts.
Put some foil on the anode end with the diode in the shade and
obtained about the same reading of 1/2 a volt.

Seems the diode itself needs not be exposed to the light, just the wires.

Does this scale up?!
If I don't get distracted, remember, the sun comes out and by the
grace of my Lord, I'll try it in sunlight

Randy

Finally something low enough tech, being a single component energy circuit,
I think I can't screw this one up and do it wrong

As far as using LEDs goes, this guy seems to think green LEDs are better
for some reason than other colors.
"Power For Free"??? - The Whistle Post - Model Railroad Forum
Would not it be a rule that the more power hungry the LED is to light up,
the more power it would generate?

This could be neat stuff. How long will a LED last in UV light?
Will the plastic turn brittle or turn yellow?
Would a glass or ceramic diode last longer than a plastic encased LED?

The Ultimate Reality By Joseph H. Cater is a 2 Volume book.

fascinating book ..

I found the book by searching for The Great Nuclear Scare Scam - Chapter 35 on page 540
which is a good read, griping ... just like science friction.
but it's not !?! ... holds your attention.
It was speaking of soft and hard .. which puzzled me.

And then I starting reading from the link below ..
And thought I need to post this.

For you energy buffs, the link below speak of the soft and hard electrons
and how they related to electricity and magnetism:
Speaks of how multiple iron rods instead of a solid iron core creates stronger
magnetism.. I didn't get the reason, but I only read it once at this point.
The Ultimate Reality - starting on Page 325

Common terms and phrases:I've only read the parts mentioned above. If you find other parts of
interest post about them.

Enjoy
Randy

Interview with Paul Pantone

Achieve Radio Archive Vault playing Vortex Network News Technology Hour from Jul 18, 2009 at 10:00AM

Tron,
It isn't hard to find examples that do not fit into the "mold" of what we have been told.

As Peter said "100% agree", and he has been telling those that would listen this for a very long time.

Peter,
it would be great if you have time, to review the link below and maybe expand or explain what is covered there. If nothing else, take a quick look
at the images on that web page.

All,
I'm still lacking a "ah-ha" moment .. I have the "oh-it's there" feeling due to the research I've done. I see and read things where I lack the background knowledge to grasp the meaning or to make use of it.

For example in the link below: "THIS IS POWER .. NOT ENERGY."
I'm lacking a good mental image of the difference between power and energy.

Link originally posted by Ted Ewert here.
The link is a single web page : Compelling Questions About The Grand Unified Theory
Which is busting loose and declaring a lot of "laws" are just wrong.
Newton, Thermodynamics, Faraday, etc.


About the link above, I have a "feeling" about this information but not grasping it.
It would help me to know it does or does not relate to things Peter Lindemann has told us.

Thanks
Randy

Ashtweth, yep you are right.
Terry Collins works on Department of Defense contacts here.

Amigo said:
"Either way, I am still trying to replicate it, because this intrigues me much,
the incandescent bulb light up without current frying the operator"

Amigo, how would you identify non-shock cool/cold "juice"?
Ah, hold your horses.. I've seen a video, I don't remember the topic.
It would be nice to X-ref that topic here.

Peter commented on the HV .. it was a Tesla setup with two vertical rods ,
I think the guy was Indian or in the EAST somewhere. This guy was touching
the rods with HV and not getting fired, Peter gave a reason I remember now..
I don't recall him saying it was COLD juice.

Anyway the question is How, FINGER TEST IT?

I don't have HV meter either. I don't have much of anything but intuition.
My experience is as close to zero as it gets.
With that said, would a resistor before/after the inflow diode,
of the Avramenko plug circuit, prevent burning up the cap?
Would that totally bugger up the circuit?

just (really guessing)
Randy

YES
That's COOL (pun intended) ..........................................
Spatial Energy Coherence, Cool White #6
Video showing night light bulb in water, non-SHOCK electricity.

What is Dr.Stiffler doing here in the video above, is he using
the circuit you posted a link to?

It's a mess over there at overunity on this topic.

THINKING out loud:
Maybe capacitors can be flaky things, leading to deep-fried understanding via failed experiments

Words can lead to great misunderstandings. The words used could be best-fit
or best-guess and should not be taken as absolutes, RF and Spatial are
used and I ask, are these two confirmed as absolute or is it a belief (best guess).

I saw a suggested use of a Faraday Cage, but did not find results from someone trying that experiment.

I found lots of links about what Dr.Stiffler is doing, but most are old news (the beginnings) and those would be moving backwards instead of forwards.

This Avramenko plug is extremely simple, but it has been confused with Tesla's work and resonance, as in "SAME AS", which it is NOT, or misrepresented or complicated needlessly.

The links I gave, I hated to give, because they go off on tangents away from
the simple Avramenko plug.

3 things curiously related to experiments already done here at this forum with CFLs ..
1) Human touching makes bulbs brighter, even with the COOL electricity.
2) Antenna as Jean-Louis Naudin used or Ground as Dr.Stiffler used
is "EQUAL to" or "SAME as" Human Touching.
3) seemingly distance related, but with strange inconsistencies

The above are a common effects and learning more of the why, how, function of or what it is, I think, would lead to faster development.

In the OU topic you posted I read that someone did 100 LEDs with a old AA battery. That's not a Joule Thief .. that's "what's going on here".

Great Stuff (running purely on intuition, without a shred of knowledge )
Randy

More info

I realized I didn't include the patent, but I was unable to find it online.
Other versions of this I've seen do not use a spark gap as seen on this web page below.

DISCOVERY !: THE ONE WIRE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT @ jnaudin.free.fr

Seems to be two of these guys:
Stanislav Avramenko and Konstantin Avramenko
as per patent US 6,104,107

I think this might have been overlooked in flurry of experiments.

Excerpt from ACTUAL EXPERIMENTS done by Frolov and Naudin
"These circuits have experimentally proved the possibility of producing power
in a load by means of POTENTIAL ONLY!"

Unlike Tesla's method, as I understand it, resonance is not required ...
This simplifies the circuit build greatly.
Power Extraction in the Point of Changing Potential
The web page above states: "Length of the wire must be corresponding to some
resonance value", but this is not so from what I understand via other
documentation about the Avramenko's plug.

Avramenko's Free Electrons Pump By Jean-Louis Naudin / Stefan Hartmann

Stanley Meyer, please meet Stanislav Avramenko: Water as a fuel...

Users listed below have mentioned Avramenko or directly spoke about the
Avramenko's plug.
anut

patmac


Burned_NE2

lighty

Mario


I can't remember who, I'm sorry I should remember, a user video tape this
method with CFLs without as I remember mentioning Avramenko .
I wouldn't mention it either, I can't say that name.

Just this could be helpful
Randy

See Self-Running Ambient Heat Engine

Opps, I didn't notice this topic was already posted:
see Peter's topic Self-Running Ambient Heat Engine

I'd love to "take a look" but when I try I'm getting this:
Grrr, grumble...

.. Randy

Compressed Air IS COP>1! by Peter Lindemann

Just like (or is) a heat pump, COP>1,

What would happen if you take a device like the NEAL TANK
and add in more than the heat from ambient air, via a friction device? (Friction Steam Boiler)

Would it run on compressed air as a closed system?
What if you did not use compressed air and used
propane, butane, etc and Closed the system for a
low/medium heat system?


A steam injector, no moving parts (no compressor used), can push low pressure water into a
high pressure steam boiler with ZERO heat losses.

The Neal Tank is using a compressor, is a compressor required for injection?

Could you do away with the Roots blower and the internal compressor by
adding the friction heater and a steam like injector.

NEAL TANK IMAGE Below, see link for details about image.


Everyone should take some time to visit Pneumatic Options Research Library: Home Page
and soak up some information.

Just
Randy

The computer in the car has a good change screwing up any potential better mpg you are trying to get.
It's about the senors and the air/fuel mix going through the fuel injection.
I know it can be a problem but someone else will have to give you the details on how to work around the problem. Your mpg could decrease.

Reducing the mpg isn't the goal, it's cost per mile that's the goal.
If gasoline was $0.01 per gallonn, you would not care what your mpg was.

E85 is cheap, thus reduces your cost per
I put in 2 gallons of E85 last time I got gas, making my tank about 50%
regular and 50% E85. Seems ok. If you try e85 you are suppose to go
slowly a gallon at a time in the tank. I got bold.
Most car computers after something like ~1997-96 can handle a percentage
of ethanol ..
The propaganda tells you, oh don't do it, bad things happen.
Well if bad things happen why do like 8-10 states not even label E10 or E15 gasoline as E10 or E15 ..? Are they destroying the cars in those states?
see link "alcohol can be a gas"
and video David Blume "Alcohol Can Be A Gas"

Very nice, thank you for sharing.

Where did you obtain the Pelton Wheel from, is that the HYD-001 Hydro Pelton Wheel/Runner from Rainbow Power?
What is the size is that Pelton wheel?


Randy