Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Tecstatic

3 posts · 33 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Jan 2010 and Feb 2010

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

linesrg wrote:

bussi04,

I tried opening the pdf files in that thread but wasn't able to open them.

I ask about the Dave Lawton circuit as I have had a couple of prototype PCB's made up and the initial test result looks quite good.

I'm not aware that anybody has tried this circuit andwanted to discuss results with anybody who has.

Regards

Richard
Hi Richard,

That is not a pdf document, you have to rename it from sm61_zip.pdf to sm61.zip and extract it.

The contents is a Kicad project directory.

To see the contents you need to install the Kicad schematic and PCB layout program.

Then you can see the schematic and the PCB layout.

To install Kicad on MS-Windows see bussi's easy to do instructions:

fetch?filedataid=22491


For Ubuntu, simply checkmark Kicad in Synaptic package manager and click "Apply" to install.

Start Kicad and open the sm61.pro file in Kicad clicking "Projects->Open Project Descr" from the top left menu, then you are in business

Hope this helps.

Eric

Armagdn03 wrote:

Thank you Eric for your encouragement.

Right now, I believe its current embodiment is not all it could be. For example, placement of the top load changes the frequency of the resonant structure by about 10 %, which is pretty bad. This means that the rest of the resonant action in the capacitive end of the spectrum is happening within the coil and running a neon along the length of it will verify this. In order take it to the next level, one would need to have an inductor with spaced windings leaving as much of the capacitance as possible within the topload. This also will increase the Q of the circuit, as you are removing un wanted parasitic capacitance.

In order to get a good inductor one would need a large-ish diameter coil with spacing for the windings. If anybody has a lathe that could turn some PVC with a helical grove for windings, I would be really grateful to see if something like this could be made.
I have been thinking about how to replicate the coils used by DrStiffler.

In a lathe you make a cylinder to wind the coil on, and with centering holes both ends.
Then you go to the milling machine and make 4 axial "tracks" (i guess I need the right word here) the same size as the 4 plastic strips fixating the coil.

In addition you extend with other "tracks" so you can fit in a square rod with non-parallel sides. Using screws to tighten the rod, it can be used to hold tight the plastic strip for fixating the coil. The plastic strips are "buried" about 2/3 in the cylinder.

Having done that for all 4 strips, you go back to the lathe.

Here you use a cutting tool with a width a little less than the wire diameter for the coil.

Setting the lathe for making threads with the right advance per revolution, you can now make the slices in the 4 fixed strips, just like you were making a thread.

Then you wind the coil in the thread slices, the coil stays put because of the tight tolerance in the slices.

By pre-adding 4 thin removable plastic sheets next to the strips, it should be possible to remove the coil from the cylinder. Need I say the fixating rods must be longer than the coil for access to loosen the screws.

I have a friend with a machine shop, so when I have finished my SW I have considered to make my own coils.

Using this method, you can make the coils exactly as needed.
When I was young I worked several years in a machine shop, and with a bit of refinement to the above idea, especially the removal of the coil, I consider this doable.

Maybe you have some good suggestions for the coil data ?

There are dissadvantages to taking the capacitive route, mainly that the capacitive end of the spectrum interacts heavily with biological systems, and hence biological systems being primarily water, act as a load to the transmitter. This means that you the inventor can detune the system, and dissipate some of its energy in you!
I can confirm this. I had some success having a nice output, unfortunately I did not feel well for a week. The key to avoid this is to have one or more resonant and loaded receivers so they collect the energy better than your "sphere" head.

It would pay to try and accomplish the same transformer action via inductors, similar to what was displayed by MIT with their wireless transfer device several years ago.
Do you have a link for that ?

Eric
Hi Andrew,

Thank you very much for these posts

I'm glad I did the experiments with my SEC cubes. Your explanations fit nicely with my observations. I think you are right my SEC cubes are some kind of hybrid. I have seen both the wide band and the capacitive transformation using differently sized spheres.

I have had this in my head for some time, and I really feel some pieces has now been added to the puzzle.

Although I have not responded much to your helping hints previously, your advice has not been forgotten.

Please bear with me, I'm still a newbie in FE. It is now just over 2 years since I got awakened by a YT video about Stanley Meyer.

But your advice made me realize, that I needed some equipment to do some more experimentation, Thats why I started my running thread, as my need for experimenting equipment has lots in common with much other stuff in this field. I also did it to provide some help to h20power & friends, as EE's are not an excessive entity here, alt least not regarding providing practical help.

So I do an attempt to make some easy to use PWM controllers, where we have the possibility to add closed loop regulation, when we (hopefully) arrive at something useful and flexible for a broad range of experiments.

I will follow your thread, so please keep up the good work, and your very clear explanations ease the digestion of this subject a lot.

So please continue even though you get nearly no feedback. Now I only get feedback from bussi04, and sometimes I feel I could as well communicate directly.

But IMO the larger picture is about trying educating many, so they can spend more time experimenting instead of fighting some electronic control circuits necessary for the experiments.

Eric