Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

IndianaBoys

12 posts · 51 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Dec 2008 and Nov 2013

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Hi Ufopolitics,

OK, if you have the keys, it is the time to fully disclose the Tesla Aarow TPU Ufopolitcs style!

We very much look forward to the disclosure,

IndianaBoys

Very cold nuclear fusion

#9 ·

Franco,

Looks interesting. Have you built a functional unit? If so, please share via YouTube video if possible.

Thanks,

IndianaBoys
Apollo Energy Systems

Obama: New Electric Vehicle Battery/Fuel Cell/Electrolyzer System by Apollo Energy Systems- AES P1
Obama: New Electric Vehicle Battery/Fuel Cell/Electrolyzer System by Apollo Energy Systems- AES P1 - YouTube

Apollo Energy Systems, Inc. (AES), 120 shareholders
- 1966 MARS I Electric Car had a cruising range of 120 miles, something unheard of for electric cars of that time.

NEW BATTERY FOR ELECTRIC CARS -U.S. PATENT 7,037,620 B2, May 2, 2006 MULTI-CELLULAR BATTERY WITH LEAD FOAM
-designed to replace Nickel-Metal Hydride and Lithium-Ion Batteries.

The Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Battery II improved over its predecessor with a Lead Foam Substrate to replace hard lead grids, a Recirculating Electrolyte System, a Gas Purging System, an Automatic Watering System, an improved Tri-Polar Intracell and Intercell Connection System, and a Tongue and Groove Intercell Connection System. One hundred (100) claims were allowed on the patent for this sealed battery.

FIRST GENERATION BATTERY
-was first produced in 1953 when it was made under the ATLAS brand for Esso Standard Oil. General Motors tested the battery in 1967, concluded range of 146 miles. For the 1968 Great Transcontinental Electric Car Race and 1970 Clean Air Car Race, the winning vehicles were powered by Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Batteries I, fast charging in 30 to 45-minutes.

SECOND GENERATION BATTERY
The new battery will have an energy density 2.946 times greater than the original battery and could easily replace Nickel-Metal Hydride and Lithium-Ion Batteries used by some of the auto-makers. The MARS II, tested by General Motors, would now have a maximum range of 430 miles (146 miles x 2.846 = 430 miles).

Lead Foam Substrate.
The hard lead grids used in both positive and negative plates are now replaced with Lead Foam. This substantially increases the surface area of the hard lead grid and allows the active material of the plate (which chemically stores electricity) to reside in deep pores of the substrate and to produce electric current through thousands of lead conductors. The contact between the active material and the lead conductors is over a thousand times greater than in the hard lead grid.

The advantage of the Tri-Polar construction is that millions of current paths are opened up in and between the plates within the cell, and between adjacent cells, from cell to cell, resulting in maximum utilization of the active material in the cells, less voltage drop under high discharge and a flatter discharge curve under continuous high discharge. The cells are able to deliver more power and to accept high recharge currents. The Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Battery I could be recharged to 80% of capacity in 22-minutes.

Battery Capacity and Cost
The battery capacity of the Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Battery I is 37.2669 watt-hours per kilogram (WH/kg) (h). The theoretical capacity of a lead-acid battery is 170 WH/kg. It is reported that the capacity of Nickel-Metal Hydride Batteries is 90 WH/kg and the capacity of Lithium-Ion batteries is 110 WH/kg. Engineering calculations show that the Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Battery II will have a capacity of 109.80 WH/kg, 2.945 times greater than the first generation battery. This means that the driving range of a car with the Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Battery II should be greater than a car with a Nickel-Metal Hydride Battery and approximately the same as a car with a Lithium-Ion Battery. However, the cost of the Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Battery II is $75 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) vs. $360-$450/kWh for a Lithium-Ion Battery. A Lithium-Ion Battery weighing 450-pounds might cost $25,000, while a Tri-Polar Lead Cobalt Battery II of the same weight would cost $5,200 and take an electric car the same number of miles on a charge.

Life
Over 100 full performance, highway electric vehicles were built, The average time for replacement battery orders was 42-months. Studies have shown that the new battery will have a cycle life of 1,500. This should equate to 600,000 miles (1,500 cycles x 400-miles per cycle). Charging the second generation battery at home takes 7-hours to replace 700 amp hours in an 80% discharged battery in a large car (240 volts a.c. @100 amps). In a small Electric Car recharge time is much less.

FUTURE
The Fuel Cell in a car will keep battery charged at all times. Hydrogen and oxygen continuously supplied to the Fuel Cell. Hydrogen could safely come from liquid ammonia stored in a low pressure tank under the car. Ammonia would be fed to an Ammonia Cracker which would produce pure hydrogen and nitrogen. Ammonia Fuel Stations could be established. Ammonia is the second largest chemical produced in the world.

zapzap wrote:

Mr. MourningHour: At your convenience, can you please post the answers to the above questions on the forum in addition to speaking to Mr. Lindemann? Thanks in advance!
ZapZap,

I second the replies be made available to the forum.

IndianaBoys
MorningHour,

Great idea to make this available.

Which of the 2 options (elements) do you incorporate:

Silver

Nickel

Do you have a website for ordering?

IndianaBoys
Tesla's Fuelless Generator ????

boguslaw wrote:

Similar to this http://www.tesla-secrets.com/

The funny thing is that they do not tell where to put load
This looks like the same site, looks like the affiliate program is starting to populate Google.

Tesla Secret

They only show a small device and make big promises to power your whole house if you buy the manual and build the bigger unit for less that $100 in parts and less that a week to build it.

Is this what they want to charge $47 for:

Tesla's Fuelless Generator
YouTube - Tesla's Fuelless Generator

Has anyone bought the manual?

If so, please share your experience,

IndianaBoys

theremart wrote:


But do tell me how you process your oil.

Thanks
Theremart,

Have not personally done anything with using oil to run an engine.

Moving in the direction of HHO but that has been quite an undertaking as car computer systems hold back any gains and Efie's don't quite do the trick. Believe will have similar problems incorporating vegetable oils in automobiles that are sensor equipped as well. Looking forward to someone cracking the car computer system so you can dial in any parameter you would like.

IndianaBoys
Theremart,

Years of "amateur" research lead me to the conclusion jatropha is a good selection.

Do not know of anyone personally or commercially doing this, just what the internet has provided.

Have visited ECHO (Educational Concerns For Hunger Organization) in the past and they have a great appropriate technology/demonstration farm:

ECHO :: Home

They may have a line on some plants.

IndianaBoys
Theremart,

Have you looked at Jatropha?

Grows well in Florida!

Diesel Engine Running On Plant Oil
YouTube - Diesel Engine Running On Plant Oil

Run a diesel engine car on plant oil.

This is a 1983 Mercedes-Benz 300SD that I purchased in 1992 for $8000. I drove my newborn daughter home from the hospital in it in 1996. Its odometer broke three years ago at 356,000 miles. It probably has 500,000 miles on it now, and it's still going strong.

Though I demonstrate Canola oil burning in this engine, I mainly use a similar, though non-edible, oil called jatropha that I grow in my back yard, at a cost of about 35 cents per gallon to produce. Canola (rapeseed) oil can be purchased in bulk for about $1.75 per gallon. On either oil, this car gets 40 to 45 miles per gallon versus about 27 miles per gallon on petroleum diesel.

These are the best cars for burning vegetable oil, because their iron blocks are more tolerant of hotter-burning plant oil than more delicate aluminum block engines in newer diesel cars.

IndianaBoys

Making blank water

#11 ·

Reflection of Mind Projected Thought into Water Photographed

[QUOTE=Aaron;37968]Jetijs,

In Johann Grander's book On the Track of Water's Secret...in the back by some scientist..can't recall name off hand...had a great explanation of how homeopathy works. Very interesting!

Aaron, it is a good reference and starts back on page 161.
It is Dr. Felsch.

Searching Google on this topic this interesting subject was located:

Reflection of Mind Projected Thought into Water Photographed

LAB NOTES

Great topic,

IndianaBoys