Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Cherryman

30 posts · 3 threads started · 123 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Nov 2009 and Feb 2013

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

I have noticed another strange thing in my experiments.

It seems (not sure yet!) That if i change polarity, the "bang" changes.

My simple cell is like this:

Bottom plug is made of sink (anodized?)

A litte above that a stainless bold with a stainless ring.

Tapwater with soda.

Now:

Stainles + Sink - = Hi pitched fast Peng
Stainles - Sink + = Lower "slower?" Bwof


To soon to draw conclusions, it could also be because of different volume/time.

One ring to rule them all

#3 ·

The "bullet" will travel very fast. It will not only be shot away, but also rotating around its own axle.



This you can influence by controlling the weight and schape of the bullet.

The simplest projectile will be a round ball, if you want you're own magnet set-up you can put the ones you like inside the ball

Example:



This will make it easy to experiment with different magnet and coil setups.

One ring to rule them all

#2 ·

What i'm am curious about is of the concept will proof to be an efficient way to harnes pressure difference.

The magnet, going around inside the torus shaped ring, in combination with the pick up coils. (How they are utalized best is the next challange).

The "input" does not have to be a combustion. Any kind of pressure difference will do. As long as you have a valve that blocks the pipe behind the magnet when the pressure input occures and will be out of the way when the magnet closes its loop.

This could be:

Heat (heated gasses or liquids)
Air pressure (wind difference, compressed air..)
And combustion.

( Maybe you could reverse it with an one magnet no baring bedini and create a small compressor ;-)


One ring to rule them all

#1 ·

Let shoot them! ;-)

Hi all.

After numerous fun designs, i think its time to build someting.


I started thinking about this after my buoyancy design ( http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...cy-hacked.html ) And linear pick up coils.

After watching a few clips on the web of people shooting stuff away with HHO (potato guns, bottle rockets) i was thinking.. We all try to run existing engines on HHO, why not try to use what we are able to do right now.

Here is a good example of a person shooting some stuff on a very small scale: 9V battery, 20 seconds will give him a projectile. :
YouTube - The RED-Tipped MICRO ROCKET

YouTube - MARCHLABS M13I'm not claiming overunity

Bloom Energy's "Bloom Box"

#10 ·

As i understood it correctly they stated: The powercompany's will buy those units , put them in the neigborhood and you can buy you're energy from that point from them.

In other words:

Clean? maybe (It still needs some kind of fuel)

Renawable? Doens't look like it

Free?: No

Free from powerstructures (governments, big companies)?: No.


It's just oldschool energy 2.0



(I for one, still think the governments can not AFFORD free energy. It will take a whole new political and powerstructure to handle free energy)

And it take's a brave inventor to share it open source immidiatly after invention, before it will be "politcal" evaluated.

My two cents

Announcement.

#9 ·

I did say it in the other tread and i will repeat it here:

I do however respect the greatness of you're acomplishment!

But...

Another example of people using free resources as websites like this to develop something, and then start selling it.. It's allowed.. But not in the spirit of websites like this!

But this is even even worse.. They put you on a leash!

Satelites can be controlled, destroyed or otherwise altered.
Fee's can go up. besides that.. The infrastructure for control and taxing is created with this kind of setup.

And proberly the goverment will start taxing the TIME you use the machine, the infrastructure already available by the satalite connection.

Here in the Netherlands the government see alternative fuel coming.. Ofcourse they don't say it.
They want to implement a little box in every car with a continues satelite tracking system and then you will have to pay for the miles you drive. They tell us it is to reduce envirement and traffic jam. Sure! .. ;-)

Althoug people don't want it.. I doubt it wil be blown off. The government need the tax income wich is now on fuel ( One liter is around 1.49 euro's now due to taxes!)

Anyway.. you guys are doing the same thing.. Although it might be clean, you are putting people on a leash for proffit reasons. Instead of being happy with selling a standalone unit to (6 Billion costumers!!)

The selling, i dont't like.. But i can understand... But the leash ... goosebumbs! Greed and/or control comes into mind.. Both bad things!

Shame.

Exploding water

#13 ·

Vortex wrote:

Oxygen explodes or shall we say burns very quickly, WITHOUT any fuel.
(see the video)

Is oxygen not a fuel?
What really burns then, the oxygen or the fuel?

YouTube - O2 CYLINDER EXPLOSION
I Don't think there was an explosion as in fire, i think the heat and weare of the materials are caused by the friction of the escaping gas.