altrez

wrtner wrote:

Error Page | eBay

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2X-50W-40KHZ-Transducers-1X-AC-220V-100W-Ultrasonic-Cleaner-Power-Driver-Board/322527305896?hash=item4b182020a8:g:ZJAAAOSwrFxbbP8L

But typing the number on the board, 13913887466 100W, does get us to what purports to be a circuit diagram - but without any 555 or similar chips.

petar113507 wrote:

I'm not sure if you've seen it or not, but I just posted this on OU.

I figure, Sono-fusion would be accomplished by stacking on various higher frequency amplitudes on each other onto a single standing node. That last PDF you posted on OU was quite informative.

I can wish -- but I think It would take a slightly larger acoustic "focus point" might yeild a similar result, but with multiple pizeo's running at different frequncies. (like the bowl, but perhaps larger?)

From what I've read about keeley, those frequencies are dangerous to play with. Might you be experimenting with those at all? I plan to in the near future, but right now had a setback with that part of the project.

I was recently testing this idea with a basketball (sphere) -- in hindsight I should have calculated the geometries beforehand for the moulding, and also had a more controlled frequency generator for the pizeo.

If you've got the equipment for it, best of luck. I'll be keeping watch.

==Romo


=============================
We are aiming for 43 KHZ, right? Well, didn't keeley have other frequencies he liked to "stack" on too?

The way I see it, you'd be pushing all those waves into one spot @ 43 KHZ. When they all hit the same node at the same time, they induce the phase change. So how would you get a higher phase change? Higher frequencies would be stacked on within the same harmonic range. This means Sonofusion would simply be the collapse onto one point (or a very small point), but with additional higher/faster frequency amplitudes -- that way when the phase change is complete, you would have a higher resulting change, from the higher energy inut.

I say higher, and not more powerful/stronger (though they may be) -- because higher energy would need to be of a faster osculation than the primary frequency would be.

I am also under the impression that water, or any element for that matter -- would simply be different vibrating frequencies. By stimulating them at ultrasonic frequencies, I think we might be hitting an "undertone" of what the actual vibrating frequency. This would explain why the waves collapsing would induce the phase change. I perceive this, because they are adding power or energy to a much higher harmonic (vibrating rate). (Which, would be much faster than I can currently compare anything to.)

I'm chewing over some thoughts,
==Romo
=======================

FRC wrote:

Good to see the HHO discussion moving on. There is a lot more to it than one
limited method. There have been many threads dealing with the HHO topic. Mike's non electrolytic was another one. There seems to be more than one way to skin a cat , so to speak, and its good to see more areas being covered.

Good Luck Altrez

FRC

Slovenia wrote:

Exciting thread Altrez!!

Michael John Nunnerley wrote:

Hi

I am so pleased you have started this thread, it is one of my passions. It is this type of frequency manipulation that I have been working on for many years.

Although most experimenters in this field use frequencies which are just above the audible range, I have found that these can be increased into the Mhz range and in doing so the molecular structures of different molecules can infact be rearanged.

Good luck with your experimenting

Mike

cikljamas wrote:

So you think that it is a hoax when someone like this guy from the
opening video claims overunity using this magnetic transmission
method ?

cikljamas wrote:

Now when i think about this magnetic transmission concept it seems to
me very possible, and it should work perfectly...

1. we use inverter to power one induction motor
2. we then turn another induction motor (magnetic transmission)and
use it as generator...OK, i just discovered America, i know
3. the question is this : if we use the same induction motors do we
get (and how) more output after second motor than we use energy
on the input of first motor ?...Or if it is for what ever reason impossible what
combination of motors we should apply to get that desirable effect - OU ???

Dont you tell me that there is no one who does not know the answer to
this question !

FRC wrote:

Yes the coil ignition system in an automobile is a Tesla patent. But does anyone
know about the the ignition system in a Model A Ford ? A friend of mine, originally from New York state, told me his brother made a Jacob's Ladder with
a coil from a Model A Ford. He said that the coil ran continuous, unlike Tesla's
pulsed coil, and that these Model A's ran on kerosene. It sounds like the coil
was delivering a plasma spark. Does anyone know ? Or am I wrong ?

FRC

Cherryman wrote:

In the case of the HHO it is clear, suspend it in the water.

But normally, how do you "wire" up a crystal? How to physically connect it to a circuit?

Anyone?