book
Dielectric Phenomena in High Voltage Engineering (1915) — part 6 of 12
1 January 1915
At the start a number of tests were made to see if a spark-over in the cask had any effect upon the following spark-overs by ionization or otherwise. It was found that a number of spark- overs could be made in the cask with no appreciable effect. During the test, the air was always dry and the surfaces of the insulators were kept clean.
Table XXXVIII. — Suspension Insulator
Bar. cm.
Vac. cm.
Preasure
Temp, oent.
<
Kilovolta arc-over
75.4
37.4
38.0
22.0
0.50
121.0
75.4
34.3
41.1
22.0
0.54
131.0
75.4
30.0
45.4
22.0
0.60
144.0
75.4
26.4
49.0
22.0
0.65
158.5
75.4
23.0
52.4
22.0
0.70
165.0
75.4
19.3
56.0
22.0
0.74
177.5
75.4
17.5
57.9
22.0
0.87
183.2
75.4
15.0
60.4
22.0
0.80
195.0
Table XXXIX.— Leads Correction Factor for Leads Shown in Fig. 107
<
(a)
(6)
(c)
(d)
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.92
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.80
0.83
0.82
0.83
0.85
0.70
0.74
0.72
0.75
0.77
0.60
0.70
0.65
0.64
0.66
0.50
0.61
0.56
0.54
0.57
SPARK-OVER
Table XL. — Post and Pin Insulators Correction Factor for Insulators Shown in Fig. 108
113
a
(a)
(b)
(c)
Post
Pin
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.93
0.91
0.94
0.80
0.84
0.81
0.86
0.70
0.76
0.72
0.75
0.60
0.68
0.62
0.65 '^
0.50
0.60
0.52
0.53
Table XLI. — Suspension Insulatob
Fig. 109 Correction Factor for Units in String as Follows
Number of units
a
1
2
8
4
5
1.00 0.90
1.00 0.96 0.91
0.86 0.80 0.72
1.00 0.93 0.84 0.76 0.66 0.55
1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50
i:oo
1.00
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
1
Table XLII. — Suspension Insulator
Fig. 110 Correction Factor for Units in String as Follows
Number of units
a
1
2
3
4
5
1.00 0.90
1.00 0.94 0.87 0.81 0.72 0.62
1.00 0.92 0.84 0.73 0.63 0.52
1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50
1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50
1.00
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
Table XXXVIII is a typical data sheet. Tables XXXIX- XLI give even values of S and the corresponding measured cor- rection factors. If the spark-over voltage is known at sea level
114
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
.8 .9 1.01.1
20 10
Belaclw Density
Fig. 107. — ^Variation of spark- over voltage of transformer leads with air density.
(a) 15.2 cm. high by 17.8 cm. dia.
{h) 21 .6 cm. high by 17.8 cm. dia.
(c) 28 cm. high by 17.8 cm. dia.
{d) 38. 1 cm. high by 17.8 cm. dia.
Height measured from case to metal cap on top.
.1 .2 .8 .4 .6 .6 .7 .8 .9 LOU BelatlYe Dentitlei
Fio. 108. — Variation of spark-over voltage insulators with air density.
(a) 30.2 cm. hiffh.
(6) 13 . 5 cm . high by 16 . 8 cm. dia.
(c) 28 . 6 cm high by 36 cm. dia.
210 200
190
180
170
160
160
140
180
«.120
|110
1 100
^80 3 70 60 GO 40 80 20 10
/
.1
/
a
r;
<
/
/
-/i
j\
/
4SSS
^
y
^
/
/
V
;
/
f
/
J
/
)
/
A
i
/
_--«'
<"
/
\
^
.^r
/'
y
y
Aic Over VoltasM
at
Vartoos kit Densities
.1
.2 .3 .4 .6 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0 BalatLre Deoaity
FiQ. 109. — Suspension insulator. (Dia., 30 cm. Spacing 16.5 cm.)
210 200 190 180 170 160 160 140
ISO gl20 1 110 §100
I ^
S 70 60 60 40 SO
20
10
Arc Over Voltages
at
Various Air Densities
.1 Jl
\A
.8 .4 .6 .6 .7 .8 .9 Belatlve Density
Fig. 110. — Suspension insulator. (Dia., 27 cm. Spacing 17 cm.)
SPARK-OVER
115
or 5 = 1(76 cm. bar., temperature 25 deg. C), the spark-over at any other value of d may be found by multiplying by the cor- responding correction factor. It will be noted that in most cases the correction factors are very nearly equal to 6. 6 would be the correction factor in a imiform field and should be, as already stated, taken as such in most cases, especially where dirt and moisture enter, as in practice. Furthermore, it should be taken
•
16000
\
14000
18000
V
\
12000
^
V
\
11000
I
\
10000
^
I
\
Isooo
V
\
•S 8000
^
».
\
^7000
V
\
6000
\
A
V
6000
\
s.
4000
N
k
\
8000
V
\
L
8000
\
\
1000
V
\
k.
•
^
.6 .6 .7 .8 9 1.0
8 RelatlTe Air Density
Fio. 111. — Approximate variation of air density with altitude.
as it is the actual correction factor for the starting point of local corona on insulators.
Fig. Ill is a curve giving different altitudes and corresponding S at 25 deg. C. If the spark-over voltage is known at sea level at 25 deg. C, the spark-over voltage at any other altitude may be estimated by multiplying by the corresponding 8, or more closely if the design is the same as any in the tables, by the cor- rection factor corresponding to 6. If the local corona starting
116 DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
point is known at sea level, it may be found for any altitude by multiplying by the corresponding 6. If the barometric pressure and temperature are known, 6 may be calculated.
As an example of the method of making corrections: Assume a suspension insulator string of three units with a spark-over voltage of 205 kv. (at sea level 25 deg. C. temperature). 5 = 1. What is the spark-over voltage at 9000 ft. elevation and 25 deg. C?
From Fig. Ill, the b corresponding to 9000 ft.
6 = 0.71
Then the approximate spark-over voltage at 9000 ft., 25 deg. C. . is
ei = 0.71 X 205 = 145 kv.
If this happ>ens to be the insulator of Fig. 110, the correction factor corresponding to 6 = 0.71 is found in Table XLII, by inter- polation to be 0.71. The actual spark-over voltage for the special case happens to check exactly with that given by b. For prac- tical work a correction may generally be made directly by use of Fig. 111.
The spark-over voltage of an insulator is 100 kv. at 70 cm. barometer and 20 deg. C. What is the approximate spark-over voltage at 50 cm. barometer and 10 deg. C?
' 273 + 30 "•'*
- 3.92 X50 _ -, ^ = 273T10 = ^-^^
ci = 100 X ^-^ = 65 kv.
If the local corona starting point is known at sea level, it may be found very closely for any other altitude by multiplying by the correction i.
CHAPTER V
CORONA LOSS
In the present chapter the corona loss is discussed. It has been thought worth while to go into details in the description of the apparatus, methods of making loss tests, and reducing data^ as an example of an extremely large engineering investigation. Experimentally, the methods followed apply to any investigation; practically, many of the detailed observations have an important bearing; theoretically and experimentally the observed details are of importance and the methods of reducing data may be applied to other investigations.
Lines, Apparatus and Method of Test. — The Lines. The first investigation was made out of doors. The conductors used in
North
pS Dltclniclatota
South
^
i
Corona Losb Final Line Arransemonl
Line A Stendnrd Lhie .4B6"Diam. 7 Stci Gable
Line B Variable Line
■ni'n"-
-fflOV^-'
Fig. 112. — Experimental outdoor line.
this investigation were supported by metal towers arranged in two parallel lines of two spans each. The length of each span was approximately 0.150 km. These tower lines will be designated by A and B respectively. The conductors were strung in a hori- zontal plane with seven disk suspension insulators at each point ^Law of Corona, A. I. E. K, June, 1911. 8 "7
118
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
of support. For preliminary tests four No. 3/0 B. & S. (1.18 cm. diameter) seven-strand, hard-drawn copper cables were put in place on each line. A seven-strand steel ground cable was also strung. After a number of tests had been made the ground cables were removed from line A. The conductors on line A, however, were kept in place as a standard throughout all the investigations. The conductors were removed from S, and the first span of this line was used to support various sizes of conductors at various spaces. (See Fig. 112.)
These lines were erected in a large field. The prevailing winds were from the west over open country, that is, free from smoke from the city and the factory on the east.
Test Apparatus. — A railroad track was run directly under the line, and the testing apparatus was housed in three box cars.
120
100
80
60
40
^,
A,
»,^
•-^
t>.
y
^
\
^
(
\
i
N
^
^
1
/
\
\
\
J
r
/
^
V
V
/
f*
■^
k-
■^■^
X
C
C
^
^
?^s;
.
n
»>J
G
Fi
S=3
^
n
M
SJ
^
0-«
in
lii 2
^
o
^
»-4
u
S
^
\
J
^
/
A
1
\
y
/
J
r
1 • FandamenUl Yoltago Wave
2 - Origlnal Yoluco Ware 8 - Srd Harmonic Voltage 4* Fundamental Oarrent
V
/
Q
1
7
N
C
7"
:^'
^
^
'•^K'
^
/
5- 6-
Orif 3rd I
Inal larm
Can ionic
'ent Volt
*v
v!
40 60
80 100 120
Fig. 113. — ^Analysis of applied voltage and corona current wave.
This proved a very convenient arrangement, as the cars could be quickly run back to the factory when changes or repairs were necessary.
Power was supplied from an old Thomson-Houston machine with a smooth core, pan cake winding on the armature; it gave a very good wave, and was used in all tests. See oscillogram and analyzed wave. Fig. 113. It was rated at 35 kw., but this rating was quite conservative. This alternator was belted to a d.c. motor.
The high voltage transformer and the testing apparatus were placed in car No. 2. The portion of the car roof over the trans-
CORONA LOSS
119
former was made of heavy canvas. This could be quickly rolled back, and the leads from the line were dropped directly to the transformer terminal. By means of a framework and canvas cover the transformer could be protected from the weather, and investigations carried on during rain and snow storms. The power supply, speed and voltage, were all controlled from car No. 2. In fact all of the adjustments could be made from this car (see Fig. 114). The transformer was rated at 100 kw., 200,000 volts and 60 cycles. On the low side were four 500 volt coils. These coils could be connected in multiple or series for change of ratio. The high tension winding was opened at the neutral and taps were brought out for the ammeter, and current coil of the wattmeter. Three taps were also brought out here from the main winding for voltage measurement. (See Fig. 114.) The following tap ratios were thus obtained: 100/200,000; 200/200,000 and 200/200,000.
Botory Motor Alternator
Otf I
Freqaency M
Car U
Fig. 114. — Circuit connections in corona loss measurements.
Car No. 3 served as a dark room for making photographs and visual tests on short wires and cables.
Methods of Test — Accurate power measurements of corona are difficult to make, because of the nature of the load, low power factor and high voltage. It is not desirable to make the measure- ments on the low side because of the difficulty in separating the transformer iron and load losses, and these may be sometimes as large as the corona losses. In these tests the current coil of the wattmeter and the ammeter, were put in the high tension winding of the transformer at the neutral point, and the neutral was grounded. The voltage coil of the wattmeter was connected to a few turns of the high tension winding at the neutral.^ All of the loss measurements were also duplicated on the low side as a
^A. B. Hendricks, A. I. E. E. Transactions, Feb., 1911.
120
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
Weather
Cloudy-rain in morning. Barometer 75 cm. Temperature: wet 10 deg. C, dry 12 deg. C.
Line and connections
(1 and 3) (2 and 4) ground wires in place.
Total conductor length 109,600 cm.
Spacing 310 cm.
No. 3/0 seven-etrand cable diameter 1.18 cm.
Transformer ratio 1000/200,000
Frequency 60 cycles.
Table XLIII. — Experimental Line — A. Corona Lobs — 10-6-10. 4 p.m.
Low aide total readings
High side total readings
VoltB
Amperes
Kilowatto
Kilovolto
Amperes
Kilowatts
Line on
395
16.5
0.40
80.5
0.077
0.10
435
17.9
0.60
90.5
0.087
0.13
490
20.5
0.70
101.6
0.101
0.17
535
22.6
0.80
111.1
0.112
0.22
590
24.7
1.00
120.4
0.119
0.28
035
27.1
1.10
130.2
0.135
0.35
680
29.2
1.40
139.2
0.145
0.45
735
31.6
1.80
150.0
0.158
0.68
780
33.4
2.40
159.0
0.169
1.10
812
35.3
3.30
165.8
0.178
1.80
830
36.3
3.60
169.0
0.181
2.40
862
37.5
5.12
176.6
0.190
3.60
893
39.2
6.35
183.2
0.199
4.70
914
40.5
7.50
187.0
0.207
6.00
975
43.9
11.40
200.0
0.227
9.30
1020
47.8
14.50
209.0
0.243
12.60
1050
49.3
17.00
214.2
0.253
14.60
1080
52.7
19.50
220.2
0.267
17.60
1125
55.5
22.80
223.4
0.283
20.30
Line off
400
1.14
0.40
80.0
0.005
0.05
500
1.37
0.62
100.5
0.007
0.10
600
1.63
0.82
121.5
0.008
0.15
718
1.87
1.18
143.5
0.010
0.21
812
2.05
1.45
161.0
0.011
0.28
905
2.29
1.80
181.0
0.013
0.35
1015
2.69
2.20
202.2
0.015
0.44
1095
3.25
3.64
217.0
0.017
0.54
•
CORONA LOSS 121
check. Frequency was held at the test table by means of the motor field and a vibratmg reed type of frequency meter.
Voltage was controlled in two ways — ^by the potentiometer method and by rheostats in the alternator field. By the potenti- ometer method is meant a resistance in series with the supply on the low side of the transformer for voltage control and a multiple resistance across the transformer, taking about three times the exciting current) to prevent wave distortion. When the leading current was very high a reactance was arranged to shunt the generator and approximately unity power factor could be held. This prevented overloading the generator and reduced wave shape distortion. For a set of tests at a given frequency the ratio of the main transformer was kept the same. Where losses at several frequencies were to be compared the main transformer ratio also was changed to keep the flux on the generator as nearly constant as possible — for instance, at 45 cycles a ratio of 500/200,000 would be used, while at 90 cycles a ratio of 1000 to 200,000 would be used. Wattmeters especially adapted to the tests were con- structed. These were of the dynamometer type; each was pro- vided with a 75-volt and 150-volt tap. The voltmeter coil ratio on the transformer and the wattmeter tap were always changed to give the best reading. Four wattmeters were used in these tests. The meters were all carefully calibrated in the laboratory at unity power factor and at 0.10 leading power factor, at both 25 and 60 cycles.
Humidity, temperature and barometric pressures, as well as general weather observations, were taken during each test.
Indoor Line. — Later an extensive investigation was made in a large laboratory room, 17 meters wide by 21 meters long. The lines were strung diagonally between movable wooden towers.
_ m
Strips of treated wood 1.25 cm. square by 80 cm. long were used a9 insulators. The total length of conductor possible with four wires was 80 meters. By this arrangement it was possible to make a more complete study on the smaller sizes of conductors, and also to extend the investigation over a greater frequency range. The apparatus used was otherwise the same as in the outdoor tests.
The Quadratic Law. — Table XLIII is a typical data sheet for Line A. Fig. 115 and Fig. 118 show the characteristic corona curves. The corrected values for Table XLIII are recorded in Table XLIV.
122
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
Table XLIV. — Corona Loss, Obbebved Values Corrected from
Table XLIII
KilovolU
between
linee «i
Line ampere
Kilovolte to neutral e
Kilowatte line loss p
K.v.a.
Power factor
80.5
0.072 0.081 0.094 0.104 0.111
40.2 45.2 50.8 55.5 60.2
5.80
7.33
9.55
11.55
13.40
90.5
101.6
111.1
120.4
0.11
0.008
130.2
0.126
65.1
0.15
16.40
0.009
139.2
0.135
69.6
0.22
18.80
0.012
150.0
0.147
75.0
0.40
22.10
0.018
159.0
0.157
79.5
0.79
25.00
0.032
165.8
0.166
82.9
1.42
27.60
0.051
169.0
0.168
84.5
2.04
28.40
0.072
176.6
0.177
88.3
3.21
31.20
0.103
183.2
0.185
91.6
4.28
33.90
0.126
187.0
0.193
93.5
5.55
36.10
0.154
200.0
0.212
100.0
8.78
42.40
0.207
209.0
0.227
104.5
12.02
47.50
0.253
214.2
0.237
107.1
13.99
50.70
0.276
220.2
0.250
110.1
16.94
55.10
0.307
The shape of the curve between kilovolts and kilowatts sug- gests a parabola. After trial it was found that the losses above the knee of the curve follow a quadratic law. Below the knee it was found that the curve deviates from the quadratic law. This variation near the critical voltage is due to dirt spots, irregular- ities and other causes as discussed later. The main part of the curve may be expressed by^
p = c\e — Co)*
(32)
where
V
e
Co
= the line loss.
= kilovolts to neutral.
is called the disruptive critical voltage, measured in
kilovolts to neutral.
The meaning of c© and c* will be considered later. The best mechanism of evaluation of constants for a given set of tests may now be considered. Equation (32) may be written
F. W. Peek, Jr., Law of Corona, A. I. E. E., June, 1911.
CORONA LOSS
123
then if. the quadratic law holds, the curve between Vp and e will be a straight line. Co will be the point where the line cuts the e axis, and c will be the slope of the line (see Fig. 116); eo and c may be evaluated graphically in this way. It is difficult to know how to draw the line accurately and give each point the proper weight. To do this the ZA method is used, as follows:^
17 16
15
14 18
12 11
10
■ " 8
^ 7
e
6 4
8 2 1
110 120180140160160170180190 200210
Betw«aa Ltnei
66 66 76 85 95 105
KUd-VoIuCmJ ToMeatral
Fio. 115. — Characteristic corona loss curve for large stranded
conductor. .
Line A conductors 1-2-3-4. 3/0, 7-8trand cable, diameter, 1.18 cm. Total conductor length, 109,500 cm. Spacing, 310 cm. Points^easured values. Curve calculated from p « 0.0115 (c— 72.1)*. Co = Disruptive critical voltage. e« » Visual critical voltage. Test table XLIV.
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
j
\
1
)
1
J
^
u
/
«o
J
/
Jk
(^
The values of e and p for the set of readings to be investigated are first tabulated and a curve plotted (Fig. 116). All points that differ greatly from the straight line are eliminated as probably in error, or, as at the lower part of the curve, following a different law. The remaining readings are taken and formed into two groups, each of an equal number of readings.
Group 1. Sie SiVp Group 2. S2« 2)2/p
^ Steinmetz, Engineering Mathematics, page 232.
124
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
Then
A 2)6
Si6 - 2)26 ASVp = SiVp - S2V^
AS6
SSe -
SSVp
Co =
n
where n is the number of points used. Thus Bo and c are determined.
t
r
/
r
/
s
^i!
r
2
'*'
k
/s
•
7
y
o
O
/
J
pr.
?
/
JJ
r
y
►*,/
—
ptl
^:
,^^^S
Ca
r/
i
/
1
no 120 190 14(qi50 leO 170 180 190 200 210 Bet.LInea 55 65 ^a76 85 96 105 To Iffeutral KlIoToltt BBecUre
Fia. 1 16. — Corona loss curve plotted between V^ and e. (Large conductor.
Data same as Fig. 115.)
Table XLV. — Corona Loss, Calculated Values for Fig. 115.
p = 0.0115 (c - 72.1)*
KUovolts be-
Kilovolts to
Kilowatts
Kilovolts be-
Kilovolts to
Kilowatto
tween lines e'
neutral e
P = c»(e-eo)«
tween lines e'
neutral e
P -€»(«-«•)■
144.2
71.2
0.0
183.2
91.6
4.17
150.0
75.0
0.10
187.0
93.5
5.08
159.0
79.5
0.63
200.0
100.0
9.03
165.8
82.9
1.34
209.0
104.5
12.10
169.0
84.5
1.77
214.2
107.1
14.10
176.6
88.3
3.02
220.2
110.1
16.70
CORONA LOSS
Table XLVI. — Corona Loss Method of Reducing (Data from Table XLIV)
125
Kilovolts between
Kilovolts to
Kw., p
/
lme«'
neutral e
Vp
120.4
60.2
0.11
0.332
130.2
66.1
0.15
0.388
139.2
69.6
0.22
0.470
150.0
75.0
0.40
0.632
159.0
79.5
0.79
0.889
165.8
82.9
1.42
1.192
169.0
84.5
2.04
1.428
176.6
88.3
3.21
1.792
183.2
91.6
4.28
2.069
187.0
93.5
5.55
2.356
200.0
100.0
8.78
2.963
209.0
104.5
12.02
3.467
214.2
107.1
13.99
3.740
220.2
110.1
16.94
4.116
Total conductor length 109,500 cm.
Spacing 310 cm.
No. 3/0 seven-strand cable diameter 1.18 cm.
e
Vp
ASc = 36.6 SSc = 606.8
ASVp
ssVp
= 3.935
91.6
2.069
= 18.711
93.5
2.356
100.0
2.963
c = ^ = 0.107
104.2
3.467
ASc
107.1 110.1
3.740 4.116
2tVp = 7.388
c* = 0.0115
2^
= 285.1
22* ^^^
2,c
= 321.4
SiVp = 11.323 e, = 72.1
c
Bo —
n
Co' = 144.2
Table XLVI shows the method of reducing. The curve, Fig. 115, is drawn from the equation p = 0.0115 (e — 72.1)*. The circles show the experimental values, and indicate where the losses deviate from the quadratic law.
126
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
Table XL VII gives a similar set of data for a small wire, results are plotted in Figs. 117 and 118.
The
7
^^^M^
4
vi'
A
L
/
K
•
/
/
J
r
*4
/
3«
1
H^
r
A
/
■ 2
/
^
ev
^
yf
r
•
1
i
o
y
<
/
I
(
9 •
90 1C
oT
5T3
oil
M) 1<
10 1
fiOS
etw«
e& L
25 86 45 66 66 76 To Neatrml
Kilo-YoTtt SlfectrTe
Fig. 117."— Characteristic corona loss curve for small wire.
No 8 copper wire. Diameter , 0.328 cm. Total length, 29,050 cm. Spacing, 0.328 cm. Table XLVII, Line B.
»S
2
■
_^
<
J^
»«^
P^
^
^
.^
■^
€ ^^
^
r>
'^
■^
V
:^
1
40
60
80
100 120 140
160
180
200 Between Lines
20
80
40
60 60 70 Kllo-Yoltt XffectlTe
80
90
100
To Meutrel
Fia. 1 18. — Corona loss curve plotted between /oand «. (Small conductor.
Data same as Fig. 117.)
CORONA LOSS
127
Table XLVII. — Corona Loss ZA Method of Reducing
KUoTolts between
Kilovolts to
Kilowatt line
W
line tf
neutral e
loss p
70.0
35.0
0.02
0.14
80.0
40.0
0.07
0.26
91.2
45.6
0.26
0.51
101.3
50.6
0.85
0.92
110.0
55.0
1.42
1.19
120.0
60.0
2.02
1.42
130.0
65.0
2.71
1.65
141.5
70.7
3.51
1.87
70.0
35.0
0.06
0.24
80.0
40.0
0.10
0.32
90.5
45.2
0.26
0.51
101.3
50.6
0.96
0.98
109.9
54.9
1.43
1.20
152.0
76.0
4.45
2.11
160.4
80.2
5.17
2.27
170.0
85.0
6.06
2.46
180.6
90.3
7.04
2.65
190.6
95.3
8.26
2.87
200.0
100.0
9.52
3.08
193.6
96.8
8.60
2.93
176.0
88.0
6.65
2.58
155.0
77.5
4.66
2.16
136.0
68.0
3.01
1.73
Total conductor length 29,050 cm.
Spacing 183 cm.
No. 8 H. D. copper wire — diameter 0.328 cm.
Temperature 1.5
Barometer 76.6
Vp
Vp
2 2e = 841.1 2 sVp = 24.16
100.0
3.08
80.2
2.27
96.8
2.93
77.5
2.15
95.3
2.87
68.0
1.73
90.3
2.65
60.0
1.42
85.0
2.46
88.0
2.58
467.4
13.99
373.7
10.16
841.1 -
AZe = 93.7 A2/^ = 3.80
24.15
0.0406
Co —
c —
3.80
10
= 0.0408
93.7
0.00164 0.00164(e - 24.6)«
128
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
To further investigate the law it is now necessary to determine the various factors affecting e© and c*. These will be taken up
^
<
y
f^
^
^
^^
-^i
e
f J
y
^
'±
20 40 eO 80 100 120 140U018020D2V
Between Llnea 10 20804060 90 108090100110 KlIoVolli BSectlTO ^^ Neutral
Fig. 119. — Ck)rona loss plotted between /p and c to illustrate the
quadratic law.
Phosphor-bronze conductor. Diameter, 0. 051 cm. Spacing, 366 cm. Total length, 29,050 cm. Temp.,-6.5** C. Bar., 77.3 cm. Line B.
under separate headings. The loss near the critical point will then be discussed.
In Fig. 119, Vp and e are plotted. This is an especially inter- esting curve on account of its range. The measurements are
6
4
^ ^'
- =^^
-,^^
1 'y^
e„ y/
„ J,^^
8
^
J
A
/
A
/
^^
/
A
/
(
/
J
/
e
J^
/
►^1
-:!
Y
100
120
140 ICO 180 200 220 Between Linee
60
CO
70 80 SO 100 UO Kilo- Volte XSectLTO To Neutral
20 40 60 80100120140ieOlB0200220
Between Lines 10 90 80 40 60 60 10 80 80 100 UO
Kllo-VoTti K«octiT«^°^"*"'
Fig. 120. Fig. 121.
Ck>rona loss plotted between y/v a^<^ ^ to illustrate the quadratic law.
Fig. 120. — No 8 copper wire. Diameter, 328 cm. Total length, 29,050 cm.
Spacing, 244 cm. Temp. 1.5. Bar., 76.6. Line B. Fig. 121. — 3 /o, 7-strand weathered cable. Diameter, 1.18 cm. Spacing, 310 cm. Total length, 109,600 cm. Temp., 16. Bar., 75 . 3. line A.
taken up to 20 times the disruptive critical voltage, and show how well the quadratic law holds. Figs. 120 and 121 are plotted in the same way to illustrate the quadratic law.
CORONA LOSS
129
Frequency. — To determine the way that frequency enters into the power equation
p = c*(e — Co)*
a series of loss curves were taken on line A at various frequencies.
These tests indicated that the loss varied almost directly with
the frequency over the range investigated. The data are given in
Tables XL VIII and XLIX. Thus when the frequency does not
Table XLVIII.—LijnB A. Conductob 2-3. Total Length 54,750 Cm.
KUovolto between lines
210
200 190
180
/
Kilowatts loss
47
4.9
3.2
2.0
1.3
60
5.1
. 3.7
2.6
1.6
70
6.1
4.3
2.8
1.7
80
6.9
5.0
3.4 3.6 3.8
1.9 2.1
90
7.5
5.6
2.6
100
8.0
5.6
3.7
2.4
115
9.3
7.1
5.0
3.4
Table XLIX. — ^Linb A. Conductors 1-2-3-4. Total Length 109,500 Cm.
Kilovolts between lines
210
200
1
190
180
/
Kilowatts loss
50 60 70 80
9.24 10.50 12.1 14.0
6.30
7.30
8.60
10.20
3.80 4.65 5.50 6.80 1
1
2.20 2.65 3.20 3.95
vary greatly from 60 cycles the equation may be written
p = a/(e — eo)*
It was then decided to make the investigation over a greater range of frequency, and on shorter lines to prevent wave distor- tion due to load, etc. These measurements were made on the indoor line. Table L gives data for a 0.333-cm. radius wire. Care was taken to keep the wave shape as nearly constant as possible. The results are plotted in Fig. 122. Co is the same for all fre-
9
130
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
Table L. — Corona Loss at Different Frequencies
New Galvanised Cable
Radius * 0.334 cm. Spacing — 61 om. Effective kv.
ToUl length - 0.0815 km. 2 - 1.00 Indoor line
Kilovolts to neutral «n
Kilowatts per km. (p)
'>"
Kilovolts to neutral tn
Kilowatts per km. (p)
1 a
Kilovolts to neutral en
Kilowatts per km. (p)
'-?
Kilovolts to neutral en
Kilowatts pet km. (p)
1 a
Test 60B, 40 cycles
Test blB, 60 cycles
Test 52B, 90 cycles
Test 53B. 120 cycles
50.5 53.5 56.2
59.2 64.0 66.8
71.5 73.7 70.7
67.5 65.0 60.2
1.10 2.57 4.16
5.84
9.10
11.66
15.95 18.44 16.23
12.30
10.20
6.64
6.28 0.80
1.05 1.69 2.04
2.42 3.02 3.40
3.99 4.30 3.95
3.60 3.36 2.58
2.29 0.89
64.0 62.5 68.0
72.0 78.0 87.3
91.5 82.0 72.8
62.7 56.0 61.6
67.2 70.2
3.31
9.15
14.56
20.10 28.46 40.20
49.70 34.60 21.10
6.23
5.65
10.20
15.76 19.30
1.82 3.02 3.88
4.48 6.20 6.32
7.02 5.83 4.67
2.90 2.32 3.20
3.90 4.38
1
89.5 85.8 87.0
82.8 77.5 74.0
66.0 60.4 50.3
54.3 58.4
61.5 64.0 56.0
48.2
37.50
31.60
18.90
12.75
4.90
6.02 9.45
7.84 7.35 7.48
6.93 6.13 5.64
4.35 3.75 1.40
2.24 3.08
45.0 50.7 63.7
56.2 60.2 69.0
72.7 71.0 76.5
81.0 87.5 95.0
80.0 75.5 70.6
66.6 69.5
0.67 2.88 6.73
10.30 15.60 30.00
37.40 32.00 41.30
53.50 60.80 90.00
51.20 41.50 29.70
25.60 13.66
0.82 1.69 2.59
3.21 3.04 5.46
6.10 5.65 6.42
7.30 8.35 9.60
68.2
7.15
46.7
6.42
5 42
5.06
1
3 69
1
10
A
1
i—
9
^
p^^
8
•a .•
J
/
s
Il
^
c
A
I—
J'
28
e _
^
^
A
^
«
.
b6
10.2
A
y
^
y
i
f
A
^Y^
1
^
^n
a
4
6
6
\
s
«
9
100
Iflectlre KilO'Volti to If eatral
Fig. 122. — Corona loss curves at different frequencies.
Table L.)
(Plotted from
quencies but the slope c varies with the frequency. Values of c* for various frequencies from 30 to 120 cycles and three different sizes of conductor are given in Table LI, and plotted in Fig. 123.
CORONA LOSS
Table LI. — Variation of c* with Fbbqubnct (Indoor Line)
f™.
Tnti 1-«B r - O.Oai em.
Length - 0.aS19 km.
T(M> 3T-t05 r - 0.10S cm.
heagtb - O.OgIS »- 1.00
r - 0.334 «bU lenaUi - 0.0816
e. per km.
..
c. p« km.
..
r. per km.
..
0,0052 O.OOSl 0.0078 0.0092 0,0107 0,0134
9.5 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.5
0.0071 0.0092 0.0119 0.0144 0.0167 0.0203
21.5 21.5 20,5 20.5 20.6 19.0
40 60
0.0139 0.0173
38.0 38.0
90 120
0.0240 0.0297
38.0 38.0
The points over this measured range lie on a straight line, and this line extended cuts the frequency axis at —25. This seems
Jim
•
IDM WM MXM 4000 tOOO 60007000
to mean for a given wire and spacing a constant loss plus a loss which varies directly as the frequency. The equation may be written
p ~ a(f + 25Ke - e,y
At zero frequency the equation reduces to
p = 25a(e — ft,)'
132
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
This is not necessarily the direct-current loss but is probably lower as the maximum voltage is applied for less time. Watson has made laboratory measurements of d.c. loss, using an influence machine as the source of power. ^ Some of these measurements are compared with the a.c. loss in Table LII, for the same maxi- mum voltages; the difference between the d.c. loss and the a.c. loss for the same effective voltages is much greater.
Table LII. — Comparison of D.C. Corona Loss wrm Loss at 60 Cycles
FOR SAME Maximum Voltaqe
Voltage
gradient
D.c. amps.
•
D.c. kilovolts
e
D.c. loss
P kw./km.
Corresponding
a.c. effective
kilovolts
Measured 60-cycle loss
Pi kw./km.
Ratio 60 cycles
d. c. loss
P? P
61 66 69 75
0.003 0.004 0.005 0.007
55 59 62 67
0.16 0.24 0.31 0.47
39.8 42.0 44.0 48.0
0.25 0.37 0.50 0.80
1.52 1.58 1.61 1.67
« = 100 cm. r = 0.0597 cm.
D.c. measurements from Watson, Institute of Electrical Engineers.
Relation between c* and s/r. — The powe^ equation may be written over the commercial range of frequency
p = c\e - BoY = a(/ + 25)(e - eoY
where the relation between c* and s/r has not to this point been investigated. The relation will first be determined for the prac- tical sizes of conductors at practical spacings of the outdoor line, and later over greater range from the indoor data. Only 60- cycle values will be used, as the data at this frequency are very complete. In Table LIII are values of c* for various sizes of wire and cable at various spacings. c* varies greatly with the radius of the conductor r and the spacing s. Plotting b/t and c* a curve is obtained that suggests a hyperbola. The curve between log c* and log s/r is a straight line. Therefore the follow- ing relation between c^ and s/r is established.
c» = A {s/rY
(33)
The fair weather value of c* for standard line A 1-2-3^-4 may now be examined in Table LIV.
' Watson, Journal Institution of Electrical Engineers, June, 1910.
CORONA LOSS
133
Table LIII. — Experimental Values — Lines A and B Relation between C' and s/r
Test No.
Diameter, cm.
a r
8
c» X 10* per km.
Style of conductor
Material
95
0.168
6550
1.07
280
Wire
Gal. iron
92
0.168
4880
1.07
256
Wire
Gal. iron
86
0.168
3700
1.08
326
Wire
Gal. iron
138
0.328
2980
1.10
331
Wire
Copper
94
0.168
2730
1.07
410
Wire
Gal. iron
137
0.328
2230
1.10
391
Wire
Copper
91
0.168
1820
1.07
506
Wire
Gal. iron
128
0.518
1530
1.05
412
Wire
Copper
136
0.328
1490
1.10
513
Wire
Copper
82
0.585
1480
1.07
513
Cable
Gal. iron
135
0.328
1120
1.10
570
Wire
Copper
94a
0.168
1090
1.07
633
Wire
Gal. iron
77
0.585
1060
1.07
543
Cable
Gal. iron
79
0.585
770
1.08
571
Cable
Gal. iron
134
0.328
740
1.10
772
Wire
Copper
126
0.518
700
1.11
687
Wire
Copper
18
1.181
525
1.02
950
Cable
Copper
80
0.585
520
1.07
784
Cable
Gal. iron
125
0.518
350
1.11
1070
Wire
Copper
73
0.585
310
1.07
1018
Cable
Gal. iron
100
0.953
193
1.08
1584
Cable
Gal. iron
Table LIV.
-Relation of c* to r for Main Experimental Lines
Line A 1-2-3-4
(Standard Line A)
Teet No.
c» X 10* per km.
1 i
6
Test No.
ca X 10» per km.
1
s
18
945
0.982
1.020
103
980
0.901
1.112
36
1050
0.966
1.037
104
892
0.878
1.138
37
945
0.959
1.043
105
890
0.866
1.158
84
945
0.933
1.074
109
869
0.928
1.078.
101
955
0.925
1.081
119
991
0.888
1.127
It is seen/ that these values are not exactly constant but appar- ently vary with the temperature and barometric pressure, c^ and 1/6 in curve, Fig. 125, suggest that c^ varies as 1/6. Multi- pl3ring by 8 then, reduces c^ to the standard temperature of 26
9
134
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
Table LV
(Corrected c* and s/r)
cno»
iog(cno»)
Test No.
Diam- eter, cm.
»/r
c» X 10*
read per km.
corrected
to 26'* C.
76 cm.
bar.
Corr. factor 6
corrected
to 26» C,
76 cm.
bar.
log*
r
Style of conductor
95
0.168
6550
280
300
1.07
5.704
8.787
Wire
92
0.168
4880
256
275
1.07
5.620
8.492
Wire
86
0.168
3700
326
347
1.08
5.852
8.215
Wire
138
0.328
2980
331
364
1.09
5.892
8.000
Wire
137
0.328
2230
391
429
1.09
6.062
7.709
Wire
77
0.585
1060
543
582
1.07
6.372
6.966
Cable
126
0.518
700
687
755
1.10
6.637
6.551
Wire
18
1.181
525
950
965
1.02
6.821
6.263
Cable
80
0.685
520
784
840
1.07
6.733
6.254
Cable
125
0.518
350
1070
1190
1.11
7.083
5.858
Wire
73
0.585
310
1018
1090
1.07
6.995
5.763
Cable
100
0.953
193
1584
1710
1.08
7.405
5.263
Cable
.015
a*
.010
.006
I
.2 A .6 J yr JB 1.0
Fig. 125. — Relation between c* and 1/5.
LS
Table LVI. — 2A Reduction op Relation of c' to
(c» i
Corrected to 25 deg. C— '
76 cm. Barometric PreHanre)
Test No.
loge (c>10»)
« logc ~
Teet No.
logt (e>10»)
«
log« -
95
5.704
8.787
126
6.637
6.551
92
•
5.620
8.492
18
6.871 .
6.263
86
5.852
8.215
80
6.733
6.254
138
5.892
8.000
125
7.083
5.858
137
6.062
7.709
73
6.995.
5.736
77
6.372
6.966
100
7.444
5.263
35.502
48.169
41.763
35.925
d =
CORONA LOSS
2i Iog6(cn0») « 36.50
2i log€ - = 48.17
22log€(cn0») = 41.76
2j log€ ^ = 35.02
AZ log€(c«10») = -6.26
A 2 log€ - = 12.25
22 log«(c»10*) « 77.26
22 log€ ^ = 84.09
A2log«c*XlO» -6.26
- 0.51 a - 0.60
135
A 2 logc -
12.25
log (cnO*) - d22 loge -
n
= 9.92
8
log (cnO») = -0.51og« - +9.92
c» = 20,500 -J-lO-s
deg. C. and 76 cm. barometric pressure. This particular correc- tion is not satisfactory as the range of 6 is small. It seems the best until more complete data are obtained. In Table LV all values of c are corrected to 25 deg. C. and 76 cm. barometer, and the constants calculated by the 2A method in Table LVI. This gives: c* = 20,50(K/r7s X 10"^ per km. of total conductor at 25 deg. C, 76 cm. barometer and 60 cycles.
Curve 124 is plotted from the points- calculated in Table LVII, while the circles show the actual experimental points.
Table LVII. — Calculation op Curve No. 124 from
(c« X 10» = 20,600-^^)
»
r
4
C3 X 10»
a r
4
c« X 10»
260
0.0633
129
2000
0.0224
460
600
0.0447
915
3000
0.0183
376
1000
0.0316
648
4000
0.0158
324
1600
0.0258
530
6000
0.0128
262
Curve 126 shows a straight-line relation between log s/r and log c*. The equation for the power loss at 25 deg. C. and 76 cm. barometric pressure and any frequency may now be written
p = 241(/ + 25)/r/s(e - eo)nO'^
(34)
136
DIELECTRIC PHENOMENA
where p = the energy loss per kilometer of conductor in kilo- watts.
e = kilovolts to neutral.
Co = disruptive critical kilovolts to neutral at 25 deg. C. and 76 cm. barometric pressure.
/ = the frequency in cycles per second.
r = the radius of the conductor in cm.
s = the distance between conductor centers in cm.
The value of Co varies with the radius of the conductor r, and the spacing s, and will be discussed later.
Relation between c^, and r and s for Small Conductors and Small Spacings. (Indoor Line). — The loss was investigated for very small conductors at large and small spacings, and for large conductors at small spacings, on the indoor line. The conductors ranged from 0.025 cm. to 0.46 cm. in radius, and the
8
^
^6
e
•^
.^
" A
l2
8
6
8
Fig. 126. — Determination of equation between c* and s/r,
spacings from 12.5 to 275 cm. This investigation is, hence, an extension of the above investigation beyond the practical range. The quadratic law still holds — the relation between c*, r and «, however, becomes more complicated. This is also true of the disruptive critical voltage. Below a spacing of about 15 cm. it is difficult to express the loss in terms of a law, as the results are erratic, probably due to the great distortion of the field which is augmented when the corona starts, greatly increasing the loss above the quadratic.
For conductors 0.025 cm. in radius and above, and 15 cm. spacing and above, this data shows that
r + - + 0.04
^ 10"^ per km. of conductor (33a)
c^ = 20,500-
s
CORONA LOSS
137
The more complete equation is, therefore,
p = 241(/ + 25)-
r + - + 0.04
8
{e — CdY 10"* kw./km. /« . x of conductor^ ^ ^^
In Fig. 127 the points are measured corona loss values, while the curve is calculated from equation (34a) (r == 0.032, spacings 46 and 275 cm.). Data are given in the appendix.
It is interesting to note from (33a) that as r becomes very small the c^ term, at a given spacing, approaches a con- stant value — somewhat as if the corona diameter acts as the conductor diameter.
The Disruptive Critical Voltage. — The point of greatest stress around a cylin- drical conductor is at its sur- face. When s/r is large the gradient at the surface of the conductor may be expressed
de _ e dx r log* s/r
60
40
M20 I
10
/
m
^
i
l!
/
•
/
'V
X"^
/
}
f
»
J
i
/
J
/
o/
/
/
^
f^
kJ^
»)
40 60 80 e - K. Y. to Neutral
100 120
9 =
(12c)
Fia. 127. — Comparison of calculat- ed and measured corona loss for small conductors at small and large spacings.
ale
(Points measured. Curves calculated from equation (34o) Conductor radius, 0.032 cm. Spacings, 46 cm. and 275 cm. 5 = 1.01.)
Provenance
- Shelf
- Reference library
- Author
- F.W. Peek Jr.
- Rights
- Published in 1915, before 1929, and therefore in the public domain in the United States.
- Collected By
- StanBot reference library