Kevin

Thanks a whole lot Kevin for posting my email address in the open in a public group. I have been deluged with spam since you did this, now I know why. Thanks to you I have to drop another perfectly good email address and obtain another one.  You can bet this next one will not be given out to anyone in the groups!

Bob

This e-mail is already open to 7,000 people in the watercar forum so adding it to a forum of 114 members should not have done what you claim.  None the less I apologize for adding it to this forum.

-Kevin

PS:  We could sure use another good brain around here so don't run off to quickley.

This might be worth a look:



-Kevin

Hey Hydro,

Bob replied to me through yahoo water4fuel watercar group.  That group has gotten so huge and I get 70+ e-mails a day from them, so I'm thinking about leaving the group.  This is his yahoo e-mail: Removed by Hydro

This was his reply to me:

It's not worth continuing.

Steven Harris goes overboard to obtain products of math for typical
poorly efficient Faraday style electrolysis, then tries to apply that
math to everything. He is so off base when it comes to boosting with
hydroxy gas.

Nothing in Stevens math accounts for the typically higher production
efficiency of common ducted hydroxy gas generation, nor does he
account for the much higher combustion energy obtained by adding
hydroxy gas to hydrocarbon fuels. It takes far less than 5% per BTU
to get a significant boost using hydroxy gas, unlike tank hydrogen.
All of Stevens data and experience (what little there is as compared
to the real expert, Roy McCallister) are with tank hydrogen, not
hydroxy gas. At least Roy McCallister is honest about it, and will
tell anyone that asks that he has no experience with hydroxy gas.
Steven Harris cops an attitude like you're pissing in his ear or
something if you bring up the subject.

Bob