vzon17

Doc wrote:

I read a research article about 10 years ago (i wish i could find it again) written by a proffessor who claimed that there was no shortage of oil. Many of the old wells that had "dried up" over time filled up again. One of the states in the USA that had plenty of oil in the 1930's and had all run dry, actually had oil in them again about 15 years later.

He also stated that one could virtually drill anywhere on the planet and strike oil. The problem is that in many cases it is not cost effective to do so as these depths were extreme.

The so called "fossil" fuel claim is also bogus. At the depths that current wells are drilling at, there are no fossils or organic matter.

Another interesting fact that came to light is that the new lead free fuels were actually worse for the environment that leaded fuels.


I will go scrounge around to see if I can find the original paper, it truly was an eye opener, and of course never saw the light of day in the media.

crazyenergy wrote:

@ truth 4u

Good luck with your use of acetone. I have been testing it since this summer and have had good results. I searched and read a lot of sites before beginning, including the naysayers. The following link has some good details on acetone and alcohol in fuel. It is from the same site that wpage referenced so you may have seen this already.

Articles on Fuel Mileage

Now to my results and understanding that no 2 tanks of gas are used in the exact same driving patterns. I am using a mix of equal parts acetone, xylene, and diesel, 3oz each per 10 gallons as recommended in the above site. My mileage has been 21 mpg in a 6 cylinder Toyota 4Runner and driving my typical routine. I have recently gone through 2 tanks without adding the mix to reaffirm my baseline mileage which has been consistently 18.5 mpg. An increase of around 10 to 15 percent. I have been buying my gas from the same station which does not guaranty the same quality but hopefully adds some consistency. My initial test were done with acetone from the hardware store which is not 'pure' acetone (it contains additives to reduce the volatility) but it was all I could find at the time. As Rick points out you want to use pure acetone and I now have a gallon from the beauty supply and will be starting a new round of testing.

I look forward to hearing your results.

thedude wrote:

I've added a video here (on Modvid.com) or here (on Youtube) of my set up.

I put in the new mjl21194 transistors and i have seen a distinct difference in the number of pulses per magnet pass in the h-wave.

I updated my project web page with better images (bought a camera) as well.

As long as no one minds i'm going to keep documenting here as this seems to be the place where ideas are shared most frequently. I'm not knocking the Monopole group, just haven't gotten much response there. I'm discovering that most of the video content that is relevant to the subject on youtube, came from members here.

Still having fun and definitely learning.

rickoff wrote:

Hi Ash,

I saw that as it came up the other day in a message at the waterfuel1978 forum, and took a quick look. Not much there in the way of "plans," and my guess is that those large ring magnets would be very expensive. Although it may do what he claims, I don't see it as a best design for a generator, and the cost factor would put it out of budget for many people. It may, in fact, be worth further investigation, but I didn't feel it was worth the effort. Just my take on it, for what that's worth, and of course I may be wrong, but it just didn't ring any bells for me. I though the inventor's name was interesting, as it reminded me of Dan Quayle.

Rick

ashtweth wrote:

4 years of research, let me know what else you guys need there
Energy Suppression


Ash