lamare wrote:
When you are talking about driving your WFC, yes, you can do that in various ways.
However, if you want to tap the energy for splitting the water out of the ether, you are in essence using the fact that the electric field is an energy source, as I describe in my article at Pes.
One way to get the electric field to give you free energy is to use resonance and especially higher harmonic resonance. With a WFC you can create acoustic resonances inside the fluid. These can go in two directions. Perpendicular with respect to the electrolyser plates and in parallel with the plates. In the case you use concentric tubes that means you can also get resonance in the direction of the pipes. Since the resonance frequency depends on the distance the waves have to travel, the resonance frequencies in the length directions are much lower than the resonance frequencies perpendicular to the plates.
So, I suspect that if you would use higher acoustic resonance frequencies, you will see about the same amount of gas production at lower costs in terms of energy you have to feed into the cell yourself.
This higher harmonic resonance principle can also be used with coils, as Stiffler and Slayer are showing and that is what Meyer and Puharich also used in order to get the system even more efficient.
To sum this up: the more higher harmonic resonators you use, the more bang for the buck you can get, provided you tune everything correctly and match/couple/feed the various resonators in the system carefully.
tutanka
25 posts · 1 thread started · 53 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Feb 2010 and Aug 2017
An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
lamare wrote:
The European Patent office has an excellent search facility. Go to:
espacenet — Home page and click "advanced search" in the menu at the left.
Then fill in JP2005247676 at the "Application number:" field and you get:
espacenet — Bibliographic data
Then click "original document" and "save full document" to get a pdf.
This one is 4 pages in japanese. The english abstract reads:
Note that Puharich also controlled the acoustic wavelength in his WFC using a "resonance sensing resistor", basically a feedback to his modulator:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki
I am working on this feedback principle in the LTSpice simulator. See my post here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post114287
You can semplify a lot using only one IC OSCILLATOR/HALF-BRIDGE DRIVER like IR2153 and IRFP450 mosfets.. in fact Puharich use ONLY alternate voltage and right cell (not metal only). Ask to you why Puharich use dieletric inside injector. Your cell is an antenna and you can tuned simply
. REMEMBER MY WORDS.. THE RIGHT WAY IS USE FREE ELECTRONS !!!
Beta radiation an free electrons..
If your machine is builded right emits a lot of radiations. In fact is an mix of Alpha, Beta radiations, free electrons, ions, etc... your diagram is incomplete but the way is right. There are other modes for create free electrons without use gas or vacuum, however the key is create high radiation field around the machine and to catch these into cylinder SS with coil. Cylinder made in SS have double function.. protect you from radiations and permit to create an electromagnet for extract electricity trought coil wind around.
If your machine is builded right emits a lot of radiations. In fact is an mix of Alpha, Beta radiations, free electrons, ions, etc... your diagram is incomplete but the way is right. There are other modes for create free electrons without use gas or vacuum, however the key is create high radiation field around the machine and to catch these into cylinder SS with coil. Cylinder made in SS have double function.. protect you from radiations and permit to create an electromagnet for extract electricity trought coil wind around.
That technology isn't more different from our reactor technology. They use ONLY water because start from H2O and obtain, after process, to the end every H2O.. again again and again. That machine is similarry to EEC of Meyer probably in association with Donald Smith circuit but they don't use WFC, probably they use water mist pre-ionized first to send inside that GEM reactor.. Principle is however every the same... electrons extractions.. Regards Alex
linesrg wrote:
Good Evening All,
Has anybody built the circuit developed by Dave Lawton as posted on p.46 of Patrick Kelly's latest Chapter10.pdf document?
Regards
Richard
