teslaproject

Ash

If you just took two minutes to get over yourself and weren't such a douche, you would realize that you dont need to know who I am nor do I need to stand in front of a camera talking a load of **** to 'prove' anything.

I just DO the experiments and then report the FACTS. Have you tried what I suggested? (putting those cement cells and other silly mixes in an oven until HOT and 100% dry). If you had, then you wouldn't have replied what you did.

You would see that it isnt a casimir bulldust effect and that it is all down to galvanics. Even a supposedly 'dry' paper towel (or thin tissue paper) between copper and zinc is 'wet' enough to act as the substrate for electron transfer between two dissimilar metals producing voltage. Dry that piece of paper 100% and you well get ZERO voltage.

Conduct the experiments instead of flapping your gums about casimir baloney and AC readings. I havent seen any of hutchinsons cells produce AC and out of all the experiments I conducted WITHOUT diodes etc, (making your circuit a radio receiver) I have never seen AC from a rock or one of these cement type cells. If it is there, it is incredibly tiny and useless.

Anyway, you go back to what you do best...shouting that there is FE where it aint before actually conducting in depth research. Oh...hows Steorn working out for you??

I am quite aware of TT Brown. You certainly don't need big piles of rocks if you are going to go to the trouble of building a radio receiver of any type!! LMAO.

Buffoon!

Wrong!!

As usual wrong again Ash!

Firstly, where is the 'proof'?? Posting a handful of unsubstantiated Utube videos (along with a very sad and shameful one of JH in a dress), is hardly proof.

Scientifically analysing ANY so called 'crystal cell' is not a giant leap. Ever looked at the output on a crystal radio? What is it? AC or DC? Answer = AC until it is rectified.

IF these cells were harvesting static or anything from the environment, there would be at least the tiniest portion of AC....but there is NOT. It is all DC. DC is only from a galvanic reaction.

You know how else you can tell for sure it is galvanic?? Stick your so called 'dry' cell in the oven for 10 - 15 minutes until it is TOTALLY bone dry. Remove and whilst still hot, place the Multimeter on it....the output will be zero...NOTHING. Over the next day or so, as the ambient humidity wicks into the cell salts again, this will be enough to start the process over and voltage will reappear. This same test applies for the cement cells.

Why do you think the degradation is so slow and the amps so miniscule?? Everything is proportionate thats why! You boost the moisture and acidity like a standard wet cell and suddenly the amps will appear but the life will shorten.

Mucking around with these cells and cement type things is a joke and makes the FE community look uneducated ESPECIALLY when you start claiming it is something that it is not! If you read the history books, the French actually researched battery technology with this type of thing 100 years ago using plaster of paris as the medium before they later moved on to acidic pastes etc.

It's all Galvanic...wake up.

nope

Tested it.

Their numbers were heavily skewed and the performance is not good at all. Still has a SMALL galvanic component even though they don't care to admit it.

It isn't a real solution and just a waste of good copper and aluminium.

??

Herr Turtur

IF, you have "motors available with certification", then why not post a link advertising such?? Otherwise all we have is hot air claims which amount to nothing and some very old clips of a electrostatic motor which is USELESS.

Show the motor with watts in : power out and it doesnt get simpler than that. Otherwise this is yet another baloney thread going nowhere.

TP

Water

Vickers

You have to understand that in this case you are NOT combusting the water, only the ethanol and that's why you need a minimum 50% mix.

The previous reply was correct in a cold start situation. There are a number of factors here. For a moment I will talk as though you are burning ethanol alone. Even 100% ethanol does not have the same accelerative flash rate as that of a petroleum distillate (hence why you have found using a aerosol starter works). This all changes once the engine becomes hot because once the ethanol spray is sucked through the carb into the hot engine, it instantly 'flashes' into a gas like state making it's combustion a lot easier than when the engine was first cold.

Now lets talk about the water. All you are doing is what has already been done (and is STILL used) in industry today. You are performing a very crude version of water injection. High performace aeroplanes with turbine propeller engines such as those used in the Red Bull Air Race use water injection to achieve a couple things - 1) Imagine that water suddenly expanding into steam and this increases compression and performance. 2) Cools the engine and stops knocking.

Wikepedia sums it up nicely - "In internal combustion engines, water injection, also known as anti-detonant injection, is a method for cooling the combustion chambers of engines by adding water to the cylinder or incoming fuel-air mixture, allowing for greater compression ratios and largely eliminating the problem of engine knocking (detonation). This effectively increases the octane rating of the fuel, meaning that performance gains can be obtained when used in conjunction with a supercharger or turbocharger, altered spark ignition timing, and other modifications."

Of course these are high performace machines which have been tuned to the N-th degree. Too much water and you destroy the engine easily. It's all a balance of getting the heat, compression, oil ratio (there always has to be lube) and timing of spark spot on. Anything much less than perfect and the engine just runs to destruction, if not long term maybe short term in fantastic pyrotechnic fashion with bits of metal flying everywhere. Water injection is used on engines which normally have a much higher compression ratio which can handle the stress rather than a petrol engine such as what you are using.

This is one for the experienced specialist mechanic, not back yard tinkerer. Be careful is all.

Hope this helps.

TP

Remain calm and THINK

@ All

Before you lap up whats written on every website out there as fact (especially something by a woman who has clearly become lost in the wilderness of her delusional spiritual journey), STOP, take a deep breath and remember that just because somebody says something, doesnt make it so. Always look for the proof because GEM currently provide NOTHING.

I read her book and for the most part, you have to see it for what it is - the rantings and attention seeking of someone who actually DOES NOT have all the answers. Most of the book is rehashed information you can find everywhere on the web. ALWAYS ask the big question - IF you had the answer to free energy and had truly completed the 'research' why on earth dilute your holdings by bringing in crappy small investors such as she is chasing? 1 in 1 million she has done it, 1 in 1000 she is anywhere near close and needs funds to keep it going and more than likely 60/40 it's a blatant scam.

I could say much more but I think this following post at the Energy Wiki site says it all.
--------------------------------
Directory:G.E.M. Technologies Omega Energy Cell
From PESWiki

"The G.E.M. Machine is the device where the energy reaction occurs. Once that energy is obtained, it can be used in that form for large power needs (planes, trains, electrical power stations, automobiles), or the energy can be transferred to the Omega Energy Cells for a new and unplugged world of clean energy." [1]G.E.M. Technologies is PURSUING what they refer to as cold fusion technology. They SAY that their test results suggest a highly productive heat generation capability that COULD result in high density, low-cost energy devices; even though the test they've ran only show a ONE degree F elevation of temperature over background -- in a room in which the temperature is modulating significantly.

Through around a week in January 2008, Sterling D. Allan of PES Network put his resources into discerning this technology and helping it move forward. However, there was a falling out between Judy Beebe of GEM and Allan, after Allan advised Beebe that they should go modest in the claims they make on their site until they have actual data and devices to support those claims.

Beebe says that she studied the Bible for 14 years to come up with these principles of how to turn water into an energy generator.
----------------------------------------

If Allan Sterling has fallen out with her and says they "should tone down things"....I'm pretty sure they are a long way from finished. No need for anyone here to worry about this nut and whether she is witholding mankinds answer to pollution.

TP