Ted Ewert

I agree Jibguy, talk is cheap. I'm tired of all the empty promises, the come-ons and the lies. Show me some proof or don't bother me.
It would be nothing for Greer to show people some of the technology the Orion project is developing. Prove to people that there are, in fact, viable energy technologies waiting for production. If he were sincere, he would be far more open about what they are doing.
I think the open source concept is a huge threat to the power establishment. All these distractions are meant to delay or divert our energies from developing legitimate technologies which can't be easily controlled.
The stakes in this game are much higher than we imagine. If "free" energy is developed and offered to the world, trillions of dollars will be redistributed to people other than the ones expecting to get that money. The power elite will lose both control and a lot of money (power) which they are loath to do.
Having people under their control who are "leaders" in the community is, I'm sure, a top priority. I am already suspicious of anyone who claims to know all about free energy, yet has never developed a device that is proven to actually work. Greer doesn't even claim to know anything and he still wants to be in a leadership position. He can't be serious.
Jib's right, we don't need a leader. We need to share and collaborate, but we also need to stay as decentralized and as independent as possible. Any type of central control or leadership should be viewed with great suspicion.
I would also like to warn Ash not to get too cozy with these guys, they're not to be trusted. Greer is trouble.

The rating on a cap is the "working" voltage, not the maximum voltage.

The name is just too close to Hay Wire for me.

Good for you Jeanna, that's the way to get it done.
I have no illusions that somebody else is going to hand me a solution to my energy needs on a silver platter. Like Jeanna, I'm working every day to improve my designs and concepts, and I'm confident I'll get there pretty soon. I'll also hide nothing. Your welcome to see what I've done so far at:
Heretical Builders - Powered by vBulletin
My goal is to not only build a device for my own needs, but for everyone's needs. If I'm fortunate enough to get a viable device running, it would satisfy me to no end to see it get built and used by as many people as possible. The more people who can send the banksters the one finger salute, the better off we'll all be.

Ted

By "lackey" I meant only those who are working directly against our efforts at free energy.
We all have to put a roof over our heads, nothing shameful in that.

Cheers,

Ted

I get tired of being treated like a sheep. I get tired of the government telling me what I can and can't have, what I can do and what I can't do, how much money I can make and how much they will confiscate.
I am required to buy gasoline, electricity and natural gas to fulfill all my energy needs. I can't own anything without the government taxing it, which is a form of control.
Enough! If I want to produce my own energy, from my own efforts, that's my own business. I don't need any psychopathic control freaks, or their *lackeys telling me not to or trying to lead me astray.
I'm drawing the line.

Ted


* A note to the lackeys: You work for psychopathic criminals who have illegally usurped the control of our country. You're an accessory to this, which also makes you a traitor and a criminal, as well as their W*H*O*R*E. Are you proud of yourself?

Just curious... Are the rumors true, do they make you swallow?

What are the chances that The Powers That Be are going to let this guy develop his technology for the public? Have they suddenly changed their policy of control and suppression?
Apparently it's easy to sell "hope" and "change", but a whole other story when it comes to delivering the goods. Greer does a lot of talking and fund raising, but I have yet to see anything come out of the Orion Project but excuses and empty promises. I hate to sound cynical, but I'll believe it when I see it.
I still think open sourcing is the best bet. Look at how the WFC is being attacked and it's a relatively benign technology. It's widespread use, open source technology and replication is what's keeping it alive and growing.
The energy may be free, but nobody in government or big business is going to be giving it away. If we want energy, we have to produce it ourselves. It's that old pioneer spirit that needs resurrecting.

Ted

I think all good, solid physics information is useful; even if it's ultimate utility is not immediately apparent.
Ideas are the parts we put together in our imaginations to build things. What may just seem like an interesting phenomenon in and of itself, may be the piece that opens the door to a whole new technology.
That said, we should all periodically step back and ask ourselves where we're going and what we want to accomplish. For example, I spent a long time hopping from one interesting project to another, but never fully exploring any of them. I had no real focus. Without a specific goal, focus becomes diffused. I found myself going in circles and not accomplishing much of anything.
I still love reading about all the stuff everybody is doing, but I'm sticking to one road now. If that road dead ends, I'll pick another, but at least now I'm focused.

Cheers,

Ted

I've also studied this issue and have to agree with your assessment. There is no shortage of oil! Many huge reserves are intentionally left untapped to give the impression of a limited supply.
Oil was determined to be the energy source for transportation many years ago, and it's been that way ever since. Oil is controllable, which is a primary reason for it's choice. It's just another scam.
We are constantly lied to and deceived by industry and our government (is there a difference anymore?). It's disappointing and disconcerting to realize this, but that's the way it is. Peak oil, global warming, 911, the war on terror, flu pandemics, the recession and Barak Obama are just a few of the many frauds perpetuated by our "leaders" in order to herd and control us. I don't believe a word of what the federal government tells me.
Weaning the world off oil is a noble and lofty ideal, but it's going to be an uphill battle. Open source energy alternatives will hopefully help boost the cause. That's why we're here isn't it?

Cheers,

Ted

I don't know, I thought you had it.

The problem with immersing it in water is the friction of the water on the wheel. This would consume a lot of mechanical energy. You could just as easily take the output to some plates.
I like the idea though, good thinkin'.

Ted

Now that the government owns GM, they need a new scheme to sell their cars. What better way than to use our hard earned tax money to buy new customers with.

Ted

You hit the nail on the head Jibguy. The Pogue carburetor was working just fine until the oil companies started putting lead in their gas.
Unfortunately, human mental inertia makes any timely change in the current energy paradigm very difficult. Try explaining catalytic conversion to gear heads and they look at you like you're crazy. The automatic responce is: "If it was possible, it would have already been done and we'd have them in all the cars". Then try and explain that lead was not necessary for octane enhancement and they just walk away. Nobody wants their bubble popped.

Ted

I've read a lot of Bearden's stuff, and while it all sounds swell, there's very little practical information included. Theory is fine, but it's the translating it into physical reality that's the hard part.
I've been working on a MEG for 3 or 4 months now. I've tried all kinds of different configurations, none of which work worth beans. There are some fundamental problems (core saturation levels) that are difficult to get beyond.
This is not to say that I don't think it can work, far from it. If I had a fully equipped university lab, I could probably crack this nut in a few months. Or, if Bearden would share his research instead of his theories, I could comb through what he found out and save myself a lot of time and headaches.
Unfortunately he, like most inventors, keeps his research proprietary as a condition of his investors. His MEG will probably languish in obscurity until he passes away and his consortium all go their separate ways. That's what usually happens anyway.
I wish I had more time to build and experiment. Working for a living and raising a family doesn't leave nearly enough shop time to pursue all the interesting projects that need to be studied. I build every day, but even that's not enough. I would love to start on a Bessler / Lindemann wheel tomorrow!
If anyone out there is working on a MEG and would like to compare notes, send me a PM.

Cheers,

Ted

If Greer really has some working technology, why doesn't he open source it? If he let people replicate the devices, it would add credibility to his organization and might also help to improve the technology. This would not violate patent or copyright protections either.
I thoroughly support the idea of the Orion Project, but there is something about Greer that doesn't quite set right with me.

Ted

I would study guys like John Bedini, Veljko Milkovic, Tesla, Victor Schauberger, Walter Russell and others to get a better understanding of "the rest of the story". Just like the main stream media only tells you what they want you to know, academia only imparts what you are allowed to know.
The aether, or vacuum, has a massive power density that we are only beginning to discover. Tom Beardon makes a pretty convincing argument for this if you can understand him.
Unfortunately, powerful political and economic interests do not want to see this knowledge become widely known as it threatens their status quo. That's why it's primarily a self study program to gain knowledge in this area. It is also extremely helpful to build and experiment with various devices to get first hand experience in their workings. I've learned more from building than all the books combined.
Finish up your education and learn all you can there. There is plenty more to learn once you graduate.

"...the vacuum is inert..." That's almost as good as: "Centrifugal force doesn't really exist, it's a phantom force..."
Modern physics is so incomplete that it offers vast opportunities to anyone who can see beyond the current myopic paradigm.

Cheers,

Ted

If you have two magnets, and hold them a half an inch apart so they are attracted to one another, the aether becomes rarefied between the two. This polarizes and creates a low pressure zone in the aether, which is what causes the the two magnets to be "pushed" together.
This same type of thing happens in a Bedini coil when hit with a pulse. The Bloch wall is pulled apart, creating a low pressure zone in the aether, which is then equalized by what Bearden calls "energy from the vacuum".
Stress the aether and harvest the energy, that's the way to get limitless power.



Ted

From Paul Noel...
"...The actual process for making oil is pretty simple and pretty well established. It works like this.

(1) Methane from either inorganic or organic process sources percolates upward through geologic formations until it reaches a Shale Layer.

(2) In the Shale Layer, there are a series of Trans-Uranium elements including Uranium and also a pretty fair amount of Iron etc. This mixture of metallic elements which is used in Oil drilling to detect deposits, catalytically recombines the methane and links it into various long chain hydrocarbons and a series of Benzene and similar compounds. Occasionally it will link to form Graphite. This process is not the process of ages. It is very fast and the outcome is equilibrium driven to a fairly exact outcome in a geologic instant. (Literally in days or less) Now anybody questioning the process better wise up to the fact that the process known as Catalytic Cracking of Oil was developed from knowing the Shale process. It was discovered to be working underground in the 1930's.

Sourcing for the Methane has been much of a question for a long time. The association of Coal deposits and similar was assumed for a long time to be the source of the methane for this process. This is the source of the Biologic theory of Oil Formation that is assumed by many to be fact.

Recent Research in Alabama Coal Field Gas deposits has given complete lie to this theory. It was assumed in the late 1970's when Alabama Coal Gas deposits were first drilled that the natural gas in them was from the coal itself interacting with the water in the area. The process was assumed to have sourced the carbon from the coal. Upon drilling the fields the carbon content of the fields was a measured quantity and it was assumed that the coal deposits would have their gas content depleted by 1990. Alabama Coal field deposits saw their productivity rise and rise and there has been no decline in the gas production through 2008.

By mid 1990's a serious question developed over the sourcing of Natural Gas. It was assumed that the developments would have run the fields out already. Their production was climbing. The production curves indicated a rise might include 100 times more production than previously estimated. The problem with this estimate was that neither depletion of the coal nor even evidence of any reduction of gas saturation became evident. If the coal was being converted into Natural Gas, it should have begun to have noticeable reductions in coal deposits in the area and none was observed. They had lowered mountains by up to 60 feet by the process and the coal veins were not thinned. The process removes a lot of water. This was the reduction in Mountain elevation. No effect was found on the coal deposits or the saturation of Natural Gas in the Coal. Water was actually depleted in the coal. So where was the natural gas coming from?

Research accumulated by the State of Alabama at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa found that all evidence pointed to the Shale as a cap preventing the escape of natural gas that was actually sourced far below the site. It was merely a cover. They also found a fair amount of oil developed in the shale boundary. The Coal Field Gas in the USA is not Biologic in Origin. The location of it in Coal fields is an accident of the fact that coal geology includes Shale above it. It is just that a coal field is a good catcher of the gas.

The cracking process for natural gas into other compounds is an equilibrium process. It is simply a kinetic energy measure. *combination of heat and pressure as one factor* The higher the pressure the more it tends to Natural Gas. The lower the pressure the more it tends to Oil up to about 10,000 feet down in the ground, then as the pressure lowers it again cracks towards Natural Gas. This is why US Oil, typically a shallow oil, is very heavy fraction crude oil. Middle eastern Oil a bit deeper typically is more light fraction oil. In the South Alabama Gas fields which are very deep (up to 7 miles) the fraction is nearly 99% Natural Gas.

These facts point aggressively to a theory that the Russians have of "Magma Oil". There is a very real possibility that Oil as we know it and Natural Gas have no biologic origin at all.

One curious factor that is not well known is the radiological data on the age of the oil. It would be assumed, if you believe in the "generally accepted" oil theory of biologic origins, that the radiologic age of the Oil would be about 220 million years. Actually the radiological age of nearly the entire inventory of coal and oil and Natural Gas is about 44,000 years. This is inconsistent with any of the accepted theories for either the age of the earth, evolutionary age or the supposed processes for their formation.

One process that was discovered in Alabama in Coal fields is quite interesting. The Carbon in Coal is known to be transient in the Coal. Carbon moving in from lower depths displaces the carbon at an elevation and the upper carbon moves upwards. The structure of the coal remains essentially the same during this process. This migration is not particularly slow. The entire inventory of a coal vein can be exchanged in a matter of a few thousand years. This brings up many questions on Geology and pretty much smashes all of the accepted theories. It is obvious that a great deal of migration of materials happens in the earth's crust and it is fairly rapid. It is obvious that the layers and content of the layers is always dynamically in flux. For example the Iridium layer known as the KT boundary is probably nothing but a chromatological layer. That is a collection filtration that happens as things move geologically. I know this will torque the brain of a lot of people. It says that the earth is a much more dynamic place with much more going on than we thought we knew."

Sepp Hasslberger: Renewable Coal, Oil and Gas - Hydrocarbons of Geological Origin

The Pogue carb was based not only on vaporization, but also catalytic conversion of the fuel. Lead was put into the gasoline to prevent this catalytic cracking of the fuel molecule.
When catalytic converters were first introduced, lead was taken back out of gasoline and the gasoline was reformulated.
I believe pure gasoline, such as white gas, would still work quite well in a Pogue style carburetor.

Cheers,

Ted