Gambeir wrote:
I'm hoping that some of this is going to click with your brain and set you off on finding the best most easily obtainable material that will produce the greatest result. It's probably aluminum but maybe a magnesium alloy might be better, though I have to wonder about pyrolitic graphite, ect, ect.
This is your bag, it's what I think you know a great deal about, so if not now then maybe later some material will make itself known to you and you can suggest another dielectric conductor besides aluminum. Least ways I call it a dielectic conductor. I'm sure this is where the piezo-electric or other qualities of quartz first reared it's ugly chipped angular shaped mineral head in the ARV's so-called capacitors, but I haven't gotten that far along in my thinking to be assembling the story behind how that thing entirely works, though I do think this Alexey Contraption is a big help in deciphering anti-gravity in general.
FIRST OF AL THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENT GAMBEIR.
Much Appreciated
-----------------------------------
Graphite not really. Pure graphite brittle. Mix with glue and then it isn't pure any more.
pyrolitic graphite I never heard of.
Here on this page:
Is a table of diamagnetism.
Superconductor −105
Pyrolytic carbon −40.9
Bismuth −16.6
Mercury −2.9
Silver −2.6
Carbon (diamond) −2.1
Lead −1.8
Carbon (graphite) −1.6
Copper −1.0
Water −0.91
Bismuth is third best.
Superconductor is best. However as we all know only solid superconductor is a ceramic disk made of expensive cake mix and then cooled to a temperature of -200c at last. Liquid Hydrogen and Liquid Helium are considered to be dangerous industrial substances. Not easily bought.
Once upon a time I was in communication with Evgeni Podkletnov.
I am sure I don't need to remind anyone here who he is.
He told me that then one of his disks costed over $3000 to produce. On top of that they were brittle and needed to be dipped in liquid gases very often to keep their super-conductivity.
Their super-conductivity he called it ''relevant'' not a full superconductor.
carbon is on e-bay
Graphite too
Only 24 mm disks and 25 x 25 mm squares.
Would need a lot to tile up a disk as large as one for Alexey's device.
And to get 1 solid disk must be made to order and I don't know the costs.
But might be well over $1000
Bismuth is much cheaper. But it is also brittle. I worked with it before can't make a thin sheet from it it breaks. It is also very heavy
This is your bag, it's what I think you know a great deal about, so if not now then maybe later some material will make itself known to you and you can suggest another dielectric conductor besides aluminum
I don't want to suggest now what I haven't tried. I really don't want the repeat of the previous conversation when as you have put it I was a wall writing up wall of text. But I also don't have very much ability to test it. At last right now anyway.
Aluminum has a special atomic structure that makes it a bit of everything. And it is a bit of all.
Bismuth is a metal and metal are conductors. But Bismuth doesn't conduct very good. It is a bad conductor. I would call Bismuth a metallic Dielectric
----------------------------------------------------
I perhaps need to electroplate aluminum disk with Bismuth layer and see what it would do. But I think single layer would not do. Perhaps a few layers of Aluminum and Bismuth. Like I suggested on my other post.
it's a discussion and not a replication
So, if I replicate something to which thread I suppose to go with it?
I have a test on my mind which I hope I can do in June. May be July.
First need to find HV source at last 10 KV.
May that will clear things up a bit.
I still believe it can be done differently. However, without a test I cannot propose that as a valid alternative.
I will go away from here for a while to see to other things.
I need to find some answer regarding experiment I am running now.
I make post about it in the forums. Some where else later and ask may be someone have an idea.
Good Day Or Evening To All