@Jbignes5 Thanks! Your last post is pretty abstract. I tried to get what I could from it. Your first post with the article is interesting. I will read the article later when I get more time! Thank you!
pha3z
3 posts · 1 thread started · 6 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between May 2010 and May 2010
An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
Does anyone have any insight into Tesla's car or Moray's box? I'm guessing they were working on similar principles. I know the construction of the parts was different, though. Supposedly Moray's box contained chambers with some kind of granular material that is speculated might have been slightly radioactive in nature (though I'm not convinced of this). All i know is that they say the chambers contained what he called "valves" and that they behaved like some kind of semi-conductor. Regarding Tesla's car, there is also an account floating around about a relative or friend that got a chance to ride with Tesla in the car once. The account states that Tesla had brought a box with some kind of tubes with him and plugged the box into the dashboard of the car. The tubes were believed to be the primary source of power. He had been working on the box in his hotel room before bringing it to the car. The car was silent in operation.
I am seriously new at electricity and electronics, but from everything I've learned, an LC circuit resonates based on the characteristics of the capacitor. If you look at Tesla's patent on Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy, he charges a capacitor before discharging it to do whatever he wants with it. Now since every circuit has a certain natural resonance, I wondered if the capacitor is actually gaining the bulk of its charge based on cosmic rays or em waves or scalar waves which interact with the resonant frequency of the circuit. I think I'm wrong on this but I really dont know what causes Tesla's circuit to be so weak so I'm posing this thought for feedback.
The reason I bring up that issue is this: isn't there a tremendous amount of total energy in the form of EM and cosmic rays everywhere? Isn't the problem of harvesting it that any method we normally use is only picking up a very narrow band of that energy? So if we could devise a way to pick up a wide band or all of it, we'd have more energy than we can fathom.
Consider that Tesla's car may have had an antenna on it (possibly receiving cosmic energy?). And consider that Moray's device is reported to have put out 50,000 WATTS with no input!! 50,000 watts is crazy! That sounds like the type of number one might predict if he had indeed found a way to harness nearly all of the cosmic or em waves passing that region of space.
Also, here's another question to put a different perspective on things: Can any light be gleaned by studying how earth batteries work? Based on strange accounts of Nathan Stubblefields work and his patents, he apparently figured out how to use large amounts of energy in some ways that would have appeared almost impossible to believe because the mechanisms were so peculiar. Since earth batteries are brewing natural currents straight from a dielectric, is there something going on here that can help understand what's happening when a circuit picks up em or scalar energy?
I am seriously new at electricity and electronics, but from everything I've learned, an LC circuit resonates based on the characteristics of the capacitor. If you look at Tesla's patent on Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy, he charges a capacitor before discharging it to do whatever he wants with it. Now since every circuit has a certain natural resonance, I wondered if the capacitor is actually gaining the bulk of its charge based on cosmic rays or em waves or scalar waves which interact with the resonant frequency of the circuit. I think I'm wrong on this but I really dont know what causes Tesla's circuit to be so weak so I'm posing this thought for feedback.
The reason I bring up that issue is this: isn't there a tremendous amount of total energy in the form of EM and cosmic rays everywhere? Isn't the problem of harvesting it that any method we normally use is only picking up a very narrow band of that energy? So if we could devise a way to pick up a wide band or all of it, we'd have more energy than we can fathom.
Consider that Tesla's car may have had an antenna on it (possibly receiving cosmic energy?). And consider that Moray's device is reported to have put out 50,000 WATTS with no input!! 50,000 watts is crazy! That sounds like the type of number one might predict if he had indeed found a way to harness nearly all of the cosmic or em waves passing that region of space.
Also, here's another question to put a different perspective on things: Can any light be gleaned by studying how earth batteries work? Based on strange accounts of Nathan Stubblefields work and his patents, he apparently figured out how to use large amounts of energy in some ways that would have appeared almost impossible to believe because the mechanisms were so peculiar. Since earth batteries are brewing natural currents straight from a dielectric, is there something going on here that can help understand what's happening when a circuit picks up em or scalar energy?
professor wrote:
Here is an interesting Thought.
Question: why does his Product burn so nicely without exploding? There is very little bubbling action on top of Kanzius test tube ...
But as to the nature of burning hydrogen, I will say that I know from studying Stanley Meyer's work that hydrogen actually is NOT as explosive as we might think -- at least when the energy propogation is closely studied. When hydrogen combines with oxygen, the reaction almost has a peculiar endothermic aspect about it. Its not obvious at a glance, but if you compare it to the burning and explosions caused by other mixtures, it becomes apparent that hydrogen is different. Speculating a guess, I would say it has something to do with the fact that the result of burning hydrogen produces water and the specific heat of water is extreme compared to other materials. I think a lot of the thermal energy which would normally be given off during a burn or explosion is actually getting absorbed right back into the resulting molecule when hydrogen and water combine. This might also contribute to the smoother burn we see from the Kanzius machine.