Well, I told you if you wanted to see a device, you would have to come to Australia, and you told me you couldn't justify the trip without further information.
Fair enough. But that puts paid to the notion that quote
I here chalange everyone to show me the device that is capable of creating free energy. I dont want any links to any videos or sites. I want to talk to the individuals that have themselfs managed to build a device
There is such an individual, less than a day's drive from Brisbane international airport, who you could talk to while you watch his devices in operation. He is very keen to find a consortium to take all of his technology and knowledge and do something positive with it. Indeed he already began effort to that end but stopped after receiving a series of threats to himself and his family. He now simply wants to onsell the whole lot and forget all about it.
I find it quite suspicious that an individual who claims to represent a group with billions of pounds already invested in research can't manage to find under a thousand pounds to buy a return ticket to investigate a working device. I mean, students can afford to come in here for holidays in their gap year, but this well financed group cannot get a man to at least come and see a working device in action and meet with it's inventor? Very strange.
However, the effort to mine information relating to the device and it's operation on your part rang warning bells for me. Is this just another one of those fly by night operations who claim to have the means to do the tertiary production, but who in fact are just looking for working prototypes to reverse engineer? Because that's what it seems like.
You say you have a simple way to test output, and that using your test you've managed to debunk the claims of many luminaries in the field of edge science and alternative energy production. Well that's great, but somehow I doubt a personal friend of mine would be impressed if I brought a person to his house to see his devices working, when all they want to do is use their testing criteria to "prove" they don't work.
Furthermore, while I do regret any insult taken, English is the international language of business. Might I suggest that if you are indeed motivated to appear serious and do wish to represent your business interests in a professional light, that in future, you might use some of the considerable financial resources available to you to employ somebody who knows how to operate a spell checker, because misspelling one word per sentence or more does not present a very professional image at all.
In closing, I believe you inhibit your chances for success by both the assumption people will simply hand you all of the knowledge to build a working model of their invention in good faith, with nothing but the word of a complete stranger as surety AND the presumption that anyone in business would take seriously the overtures of someone who can't even make the effort of having a secretary parse their communications for simple spelling errors.
(I'm available, at the rate of $1 per word, to do editorial and secretarial work, if you've a need.)