h2opower.
20 posts · 1 thread started · 20 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Feb 2009 and Feb 2010
An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
#7 ·
So the cost of such a system goes way down with Meyer's work added in. By the way where can I find those fuel cells and how much do they cost? Plus I would need their way of separating the hydrogen from the oxygen too. I don't know the life of an HICE being run 24/7 but that is noisy and has moving parts, but it will give people other options if the cost is too high for the hydrogen fuel cell. I found this on HICE: http://www.utexas.edu/research/cem/i...wis%20HICE.pdf
and energy independence is now just around the corner.
#4 ·
Inquorate wrote:
The ppl in the water sparkplug thread are doing a wonderful job of trying to make car engines run on different percentages of water mixed with the fuel.
But after watching these videos
YouTube - Thermite and Ice
YouTube - Panacea-BOCAF Water Spark Plug (3 of 3)
YouTube - Burn water burn
I thought of the possible combination of these two effects
YouTube - Mist maker
YouTube - capacitor discharge
And then of trying to make an engine. Because making a petroleum fuel motor run on water is probably harder than trying to make a 2 stroke engine run on diesel.
Then we could have the motor running some kind of generator.
I don't have the funds at the moment, it's more of a long term goal. I'm thinking of experimenting eventually with a hobby aircraft motor. First would be the mister and plasma discharge from a cap bank.
But I thought for now, why not start a discussion about simply exploding water.
Love and light
future pather wrote:
All of the power that any car company has lies in the fact that people want their products. There is a value in what they provide, otherwise this would be a non-issue. People don't need to be tricked into wanting cars and buying cars.
patmac wrote:
Yes H2Opower
If yours North-American people wants modify the system, I think that Parlamentary System like Italy can works. President is eliminated the system is directed by First Minister but strong discussion must be approved by the parlament this avoid and blocks a possible dictatorman.
.
future pather wrote:
I'm not pro or anti Gates, I really don't know anything from the inside.
But I have a hard time equating Planned Parenthood with sterilization. Usually that organization is about providing options, but I don't know about this particular situation.
Also consider, there is a very real overpopulation problem in many less affluent countries. That would in no way justify imposed sterilization, but it does make a case for providing options to people that they might not otherwise have.
Jessica
Aromaz wrote:
Did you actually build the contraption? That is the only true proof. I have
never seen another presentation of this fuel cell. I have seen and I have
been interested; actually mesmerized is a better word. I did try some of the
concepts in experiments, and so did many other people - all just to fail.
"In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom
he had sold dealerships........Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered
a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed."
Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Aromaz wrote:
I read, and read again. I was hoping to see something more powerful.
Yet I feel totally confused: Working...proven....do research....need to
develop? There is a red balance sheet here!
Nobody even did proper research! All is like clips from Overunity.com -
dreams. Very narrowly considered. This document even fails to refer to
some devices that were in fact operational AND working - by name, date,
inventor and results.....
Fortunately I am not in USA nor American, so the rest of the world
is fairly free of the problems you have.
However, with what I know and understand, I would not expect
this document to go very far.
1. 80% is based on theories of Dr. Tom Bearden - THEORIES; with all respect.
2. To date, none of these has been achieved nor proven.
3. A call might be made, which will ask for practical proof
- which you can not provide.
4. You are asking for funds - to do RESEARCH and devellopment
- all based on unproven theory.
Unless you can come up with somehting concrete, I do not think
this document will make any impression.
Besides, many of the things you are talking about are already in operation;
but they can not reveal it, or release it into public - for fear of people like
me that is sitting in Thailand. Technology like "COUNTER-gravity", ionic
propulsion (re. Lifter) are already in use for air and space crafts - and fairly
public knowledge!
As Investor, I can guarantee you this will not go off as investment;
way out too vague. You give a budget, but no business plan?
Anyway, as I said, I am not American, so who knows; you might be lucky.
I prepared an eleven hour presentation to my investors;
and even me alone has plenty more facts presented there.
Personal advice: Make a video presentation, cut it to be less than 20 minutes.
And use FACTS, demonstrations. Forget about the numbers, that can come
much later. Get the attention first, open your door.
A video presentation is worth a trillion words.
As for Pres. Obama - I have great respect for him and I do think he has
all the potential of being your best President ever. AND he is very intelligent,
way out more than all your other politicians. He knows how to play the ball
game there - not by learning from others; but by his own instinct.