Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

gyula

6 posts · 220 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Sep 2008 and May 2013

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

help with hydrogenerator coils, please!

#8 ·

daveparf wrote:

....
My question is,
Should all my coils be wound the same way and positioned so one side of the coil has a north pole magnet behind it and the other side of the coil have a south pole magnet behind it? i am using 4 coils so they will all be positioned the same way. I am thinking the north magnet will send current up one side of the coil and the south will send the current down the other side of the coil?

Thanks Dave
Hi David,

Interesting idea, especially if it can be permanently built into main pipelines feeding several homes, districts etc where there are quasi continuous water consumption day and night. Of course it can also be useful within a single home.
To answer your question I can only help by pointing to a thread here where Bedini was quoted how his so called Window motor works. The Window motor resembles the most to your mechanical setup and you can see how he positioned the coils and the magnets. Of course it is a motor setup and you have a generator setup I know but I think if the motor setup is understood then the generator setup can also be clearer.
Here is video on the Window motor:
Bedini-Cole Window Motor - YouTube
Here is the thread:
fetch?filedataid=22491

(This picture may also help: http://www.icehouse.net/john1/afield.jpg )
I have not built coils with the shape you show in your picture or coils like shown in a Window motor this is why I answer like this. If you feed some hundred milliAmper DC current into one of your coils from a low voltage source and explore with a compass the static magnetic poles developing around such coil format you have, then it may also give useful info what poles are to be present and where, then you turn your mind into "generator mode".

Gyula

What's Happened to Timothy Thrapp?

#14 ·

Hi Nick,

I have read the post from Tim you refer to, however I cannot consider it seriously due to his vague statements while no any relevant info is given.

See this link Gifts & Products & Books - WITTS (World Improvement Through The Spirit any useful-sounding topic starts from $100, $200 you are expected to donate and during the years no any replicated working device (giving extra output) has 'leaked' out from the 'donators' like in case of some other 'blue prints' also sold for money and proved to be under unity.

I wish their tecnology were real but you can only make sure of this when you pay. And reading members arapoint and Holle posts above from 2010 I will not risk...

Thanks, Gyula

NickZ wrote:

Gyula:

Yes, I've seen and heard it all before. Just give the devices, not the ministry the benefit of the doubt, without any monetary interests involved.
It is important to resolve this question of power production, and not confused it with what could be called corruption, or deceit.
What they have mentioned in the video of the dome, makes sense to me.
But, I take no sides in this, just interested in the results of the devices.



You did not mention this post though (below), that is on the same forum page.
Does it not count, or have any weight?

Tim Tim
Junior Member

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
WITTS Ministries is the real deal. I donated to the cause and was able to see many of the devices demonstrated.

I've been researching, developing and building "alternative" devices for 8 years or so. I know the difference between an amp and a volt. Sir Timothy blew my socks off! These minister/scientist/engineers are the most advanced in these technologies as I've ever come across.

In my opinion, their intention is absolutely to help restore the earth to a paradise. Most of their devices are much more advanced than meets the eye. They may look a little crude in the videos, but the principles they employ are very sophisticated and are not easily duplicated in a person's garage.

Don't confuse the ministry with other religious institutions. They are not becoming wealthy off the donations they receive. They truly want to help, but it won't happen within the fading paradigms of greed and corruption that seem to be everywhere. The capitalists are only interested in the money.
I hope I don't offend anyone on this forum, but I felt WITTS needs someone to speak for them since people sometimes have a difficult time with the manner in which the ministry communicates.

Again... I've seen it first hand. My life has not been the same since.
Peace.
- Tim

Orbo

#7 ·

Hi Michel,

1) If I recall correctly a toroid is wound that way you describe when the coil self capacitance is important to remain low (physical distance is left deliberately between the wire endings) I do not think this is so much important in Orbo though, cannot think of any reason a few picoFarads more across the coil would make much difference in the operation.

2) If I get you correctly, you mean normal air gap, right? If so, it was used for preventing the transformer from going into saturation. Air gaps usage was a "must" for choke coils in power supplies where the rectified AC current had to be filtered and the DC component would have saturated the choke coil's core, making the the several Henry self inductance fall dawn, hence rendering the 'choking' i.e. filtering effect useless.

3) The same would happen to a toroidal core, it would need higher current or stronger magnetic field from the magnets to bring it into or near to saturation, if it had an air gap.

4) Again the question of saturation, if the Orbo principle is based on saturation

5) Sorry, no info on that.

rgds, Gyula


Michelinho wrote:

Hi all,

I have a few questions and comments:

1- From all the old electrical books, a toroid should be wound only on 330 degrees and not all around. Why? I have a few toroids coming from an old medical laser power supply and the toroid were wound only on 330 degrees...

2- When making a transformer, the old ones were placing a small spacer of paper or mica (4mm I think) between the adjoining parts of the armature increase its "efficiency? A toroid with a small slit on it with a thin paper spacer in would work better?

3- What if the toroid has slit and the winding is in 2 sections covering each half of the 330 degrees and placed with the 30 degrees with no wire facing the incoming magnet duets? Would it change something in the equation? (The slit could be on the exit side of the magnet duets)

4- what if the toroid is slit in two and each has its winding as #3?

5- The coils are all in series but are they connected the same or some are inverted?

Thanks to all that can shed light on these.

Take care,

Michel

Avramenko's plug - Single wire power

#3 ·

Hi Randy,

Here are some other patents on this topic, by one of them, Avramenko Stanislav:

RU2108649, see this link:

esp@cenet — Bibliographic data

And RU2255405 and RU2255406 by him and another person:

esp@cenet — Bibliographic data

esp@cenet — Bibliographic data

Unfortunately, these three are in Russian.

I think if we make a high Q resonant tank circuit and oscillate it in a very low power oscillator, then the high resonant amplitude could be loaded by a "plug" and probably the high Q would still be maintained. Question is how much power could be received from the plug's output, compared to the oscillator input power?

rgds, Gyula