Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

FuzzyTomCat

9 posts · 1 thread started · 90 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Jul 2008 and Jul 2010

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

UncleFester wrote:

I guess all my comments and test data from the time I spent with Krupa in Utah got throw out or edited out. Krupa is still living out of his car or living in people's RV's. Currently he is down near Bullhead city working with the doctor who is working on the Air turbine.

6 months of building and testing Firestorm, and over 200k American dollars, the results were null and void. There was no gain in horsepower, nor was there any mileage gain, nor did Krupa ever show any documentation form Lotus engineering and their tests of running an engine at over 24:1 on the Firestorm plugs. Our investor finally gave up on the project.

Bob is now looking for new investment into the plug but still has not show any test data nor anyone who could confirm the test results he still claims are valid.

Tad
Hi UncleFester,

I'm sorry I missed this, GOLLY !!! ..... after reading your posts in the other threads here at just Energetic Forum there is a better understanding from me on your statement here. I find it interesting that through Bob's patent where he was trying to cover every possible way a spark plug threaded base with basket configuration could be made, and then lets the patent laps.

Plus the information from a accredited automobile manufacture as Lotus engineering on their testing of prototypes in their facility and Bob using excuses to never show the air to fuel and horsepower gains supposedly documented by Lotus on the testing.

Then to use the lapsed patent and the never seen before testing documentation to acquire $200,000.00 from a investor for advancing the invention ..... WOW !!!

Thanks for this information !!

Glen

theremart wrote:

When i was listening to that was the guy stated that you could fix the spark plug that was on the market if you just used a Dremel tool to take the spark plugs they did not produce correctly then modify it.
I think the spark plugs that were referred to were the Splitfire and/or NGK V-Power brands with the split electrode.

The other interesting thing that Bob Krupa mentioned was the new design using the 1% Beryllium 98% Copper alloy and that the manufacturing could be done in a jewelery store where Goldsmith work is done. "WHAT A HINT" !!!

This would mean that the new electrode and threaded base with the basket is being made through a "Investment Casting" process the same as Goldsmiths and some specialized industries uses for finished cast parts.

Investment casting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The basic equipment needed to manufacture this type of "Firestorm" spark plug in small quantities is the same as a Goldsmith .....

Jewelry Making Supplies | Casting - Beading Supplies, Metal Working Tools

And here's one of the big players I've actually done some work with in their wax casting rooms renovation years ago located in Portland, Oregon. They specialize in Commercial and Military Turbine Aircraft or Generation Blades & Vanes, Cruse Missile components, Medical prosthesis joint replacements and many other products.

Precision Castparts Corp. Home Page
Waxes - Argueso

So this is actually easier than welding a bunch of small parts together for a finished product ..... these two parts can be cast with little to no machining, with possibly only a rolled edge needed at the time of assembly at the top of the threaded base and basket. This is to hold in the insulator and pre installed electrode assembly using some kind of high temperature silicone one way jacket sealing "O" rings internally.

Just a Thought

Glen
Robert Kurpa's Firestorm Plugs

Hi everyone,

There is a thread started by Aaron quite some time ago here at Energetic with more details on patent information, replication data and video references ..... this is the link ....

Robert Kurpa's Firestorm Plugs

It does appear possibly some revised design changes have happened regarding the metal material being used in the electrode and threaded base.

Regards,
Glen
Hi everyone,

I just saw some information on the "Firestorm" spark plugs invented by Bob Krupa, CEO of Century Development International that is very thought provoking.

This is a "LIVE" interview by "SmartScarecrow" of the Scare Crow Show on March 11, 2010 ..... approximately 71:48 ( 71 minutes, 48 seconds ) long but well worth it.

20100311 - Interview w/Robert Krupa - Firestorm spark plug, Interview with the inventor of the firestorm spark plug, Robert Krupa. SmartScarecrow on USTREA...
[server loads real slow ..... interview starts at 9.26 minutes in]

Things of interest .....

FIRESTORM spark plug operates at a 30 to 1 air to fuel ratio ( optimum 24 to 1 ) 90 to 1 possible

FIRESTORM needs 1.25 joules of ignition power ( crane cam ignitions ) @ 33:00
[ MSD .6 joules power not enough - stock "Standard" ignition .25 joules ]

FIRESTORM spark plug center "Electrode" is a one piece cast ball not machined

FIRESTORM spark plug threaded base and electrode is a alloy 1 % birrilum 98% copper

FIRESTORM plasma ark not spark

FIRESTORM spark plug exploding water as fuel using 5 to 6 joules of ignition power @ 45:00

Best Regards,
Glen
Hi Jetijs,

Very impressive prototype construction , the only problem I've ever seen with these type of devices is the oil foaming up and the oil loosing its viscosity from the heat from prolonged operation.

Best Regards,
Glen

Aaron wrote:

Hi Glen,

I have no idea what the whole deal on this is but for $15 in parts, I'll try it.

I think you would have to double the surface area of the tube since you have the inner surface as well.
I did,

Tube-
2 x Pi x .125 (r)= .785 + 2 x .0625 (r)= .392 > .785 + .392 = 1.177

Wire-
2 x Pi x .038 (r)= .238 X (strands) 7 = 1.666

I hope my math is ok, gettin old,

Glen
What ?????

Aaron,

I've never heard or seen this before, went to the web site and am really confused with this whole concept. The battery cable for instance, auto manufactures on an average use a #4 AWG CU wire rated at 95 amps for the battery connections.

General Spec's
1) CU wire dia. (.232 in) Strands 7 @ (.077 dia)

CU Tube Product Spec's
1) Outside dia. (.250 in) Inside dia. (.125 in)

As I'm sure you know the electrical current flows on the exterior or surface of the wire or anything conductive.

The formula for Round Surface Area is - 2 x PI x R x H = sq.in.
(R= radius, H= height)

Given that formula - a 1" long item

The tube has - 1.17 sq.in. surface area
The wire has - 1.69 sq.in surface area

The tube having a loss of - .52 sq.in. surface area (a hefty percentage)

Where does the current loss go into magnetism or is it a loss all together, I don't understand this concept, a vehicle needs what current it needs not a loss in current ??

(a starter uses between 1.2 - 1.8 kw at 12V DC nominal)

Any comments ?

Glen