Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

DrStiffler

4 posts · 42 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Oct 2009 and Jan 2011

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Cross Field Capacitor

#11 ·

May be of interest

Patents by Louis R. O'Hare
US 4,074,129 and 4,151,409. He has others.
Interesting reading to go along with this thread.

Simple COP 3 with 4 transformers in series?

#9 ·

lamare wrote:

@Doc: As usual, you are completely right.

You can do this, but you have to put the transformers 2 by 2 in series, and drive them the way Puharich did. Puharich drove only 1 load, and het put his rectifier before his "insulating transformer". That's a mistake, because then your power amplifier must deliver a considerable amount of power to the insulating transformer, because of the sharp edge at the zero crossing. Other than that, he did it right.

So, what you need to do is drive the power amp with a modulated signal and put the rectifier *after* the transformer, such that you drive two identical loads in opposit phase. Then you can drive the transformers with very, very little power, as I posted here:


@TanTric: in theory, yes. I have analysed the systems of Edwin Gray, Stanley Meyer and Puharich. I finally figured out how they worked and the all used the exact same principle.

However, all of them got it only half way. They "split" only the "positive". If you do this right, you can figuratively speaking drive your car from a 9V battery cell. Of course, that's a bit of an overstatement, but you do get very, very, very much more power out than you have to put in yourself.

Now this is not a perpetuum mobile, as I posted here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108418
@lamare
So, what you need to do is drive the power amp with a modulated signal and put the rectifier *after* the transformer, such that you drive two identical loads in opposit phase.
Okay I have been able to follow this, yet I seem to be missing something. If we for example drive a coil bifiler for example at 180' out of phase, we should create a very strong scalar wave. Now if we drive to legs of a system (isolated) so that we have the Pos. and Neg. split, we will have a very interesting condition in the lattice between the two systems. This particular area of space will contain a very large amount of energy that will propagate out through the lattice and will be lost to the circuits.

Think of this as two stones being dropped into a pool of water, say a meter apart, then what results in the center as the waves confront one another? I do not see how this energy is utilized.

Simple COP 3 with 4 transformers in series?

#6 ·

lamare wrote:

Looks like I can answer this question too now. See what I posted here:




So, if you want real power, you should drive it with a frequency 100 or 1000 times the natural resonance frequency of the transformers and feed that to one open end of one of the primaries. Then you can tap off all the power you want from the "primaries" of the others.

So, you basically make a simple sine-wave HF oscillator and use that to get the whole thing into resonance. If the frequency you "transmit" is x times lambda, you basically get an "x lambda" antenna, which will give you a considerable, *real* gain.



Will this work, or do we have to split the circuit in two and use modulation the way Puharich did?
@lamare
It has been many years now, but I took a 70 hour course in 'Antenna Theory and Design', one of the first being offered in the early 70's. Anyway you have to be careful when you talk of antenna gain as it is not a true gain, what is happening is the radiation pattern is modified and concentrated into a focused area. I used collinear antennas for some time when I was active in ham radio and they did just this, they pulled the energy lost into the upper levels down to a low profile and this energy was greater for the receiver in uv/m, yet there was no OU here. We had a simple rule of thumb about obtaining a greater distance from a transmitter (specific of course to the freq range) and that was to go twice the distance, (a) double your antenna height or (2) quadruple your transmitter power. A beam antenna is a great example of the focusing of the energy, yet there is no OU involved.

Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying, but to my knowledge a conventional antenna arrangement only modifies the pattern and gives one a moment of thought in the result.

Spontaneous charging radiantly charged capacitor research group

#15 ·

Light Bulbs

Using a light bulb for any kind of testing is totally subjective because of their non-linear response curve. As the bulb conducts it heats and the resistance increases, this means that there is a infinite number of curves that can apply to the measurement result. The human eye is worse that the ear for discerning incremental changes.

A capacitor has what I will call 'Dielectric Retention', 'Dielectric Storage' if you prefer, but what this says is that a capacitor will not totally discharge at first pass. You discharge and then let it sit a few seconds and the 'stored' charges migrates back out of the dielectric and appears as the cap is charging itself of this so called radiate energy is charging it. This is not he case. Even if the cap is direct shorted with a 0 ohm short, it will recover some energy from the dielectric when the short is removed.

In 44 years of electronics I have never seen a capacitor gain charge from what is a fraction of the initial charge it received. What is being seen is wrong in assumption. Through proper power measurement it is found that this pseudo charge is only a portion of the original charge (charges) that have not been properly dissipated.

Much confusion exists here and I feel that it is normally the result of improper measurement and mathematical assessment.