Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

cikljamas

12 posts · 2 threads started · 66 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Jan 2011 and Mar 2011

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

SkyWatcher wrote:

Hi folks, Hi cikljamas, thanks for sharing this video and information and your video as well.
If what mindfreer has shown in his video is truthful, then it works and one has to get the geometry and magnet strength and spacing correct or it probably will not work.

Also, he probably powered his primary drive motor with a 12 volt battery powering a 120 volt inverter then input 120 volts to main motor.

Then if the generator outputs 120 volts ac, he stepped it down with a transformer to charge the 12 volt battery or the alternator is 12 or 24 volts then rectified to charge battery and maintain loads.

I have a bunch of 1" diameter neo magnets, this sure is looking tempting to replicate.

Thanks for sharing that video ibpointless2,
i seem to recall an experiment that showed a rotating flywheel when spun up to speed for a few minutes steady and after stopping required far less input to rotate up to the same speed as if space was somehow agitated and space itself is put into motion.

Maybe magnets can help augment this effect, which seems likely based on your results of it increases and decreasing based on which side you placed the magnets.
peace love light
Tyson

Edit: i wonder if this would work with axially placed magnets.
Also i seem to recall Dennis lee, who came up with the sunshine generator i think, he showed a video where he had two wheels with magnets on periphery like mindfreers video and when he spun one they both interacted and both rotated for way longer than what one would expect, i think he was showing these effects by that demonstration.
Hi Skywatcher, thanks for your reply !
What kind of motors do you think Mindfreer uses in his demonstration ?
Do you think that both motors are of the same kind ?
Do you think that we could try this with two washing machines cage induction motors ?

altrez wrote:

Once a load is applied the second motor it drops "at least in my tests" down to about %40 over all end to end efficiency. The reason I believe for this is that once one adds a load to the second motor the motor slows down.

Very easy to reproduce with two small motors a power source and a small load.

Try it with a light bulb / paper weight and small electrolytic capacitor.

-Altrez
So you think that it is a hoax when someone like this guy from the
opening video claims overunity using this magnetic transmission
method ?
Now when i think about this magnetic transmission concept it seems to
me very possible, and it should work perfectly...

1. we use inverter to power one induction motor
2. we then turn another induction motor (magnetic transmission)and
use it as generator...OK, i just discovered America, i know
3. the question is this : if we use the same induction motors do we
get (and how) more output after second motor than we use energy
on the input of first motor ?...Or if it is for what ever reason impossible what
combination of motors we should apply to get that desirable effect - OU ???

Dont you tell me that there is no one who does not know the answer to
this question !
Now i saw this video again,maybe some english native speaker could
understand better what that guy is trying to say about his magnetic
rotors (in 1:00 min. of the video he talks about that) as the reason of
achieving much better results than it would be if he used belts or gears
for transmission instead of magnets...I think better understanding of
english is not going to help indeed, because he doesnt explain much
about that, but maybe someone with better knowledge and more
experience could explain that though ...
It seems so convincing, but very similar as it is with watkykjys stuff from
"this is it" thread, seems to be to much mysteries about this device,
and when i see so much hiding details than i ask myself (after all these
kind of experiences) why this concealing darkness if not to prevent discovery
of something that is presented as something which is offered to people ?

So if someone has intention to hide something why than offering it in the
first place as something opened and shared ?

I know, human beings are very funny devices , but i can not to become used to that fact, i must be some different kind of device...

differences ?

#4 ·

bugler wrote:

Do you mean that Stan Mayers is like Hitler? LOL.

I run the hitler speech (by the way what was he talking about?) and the stan mayers video and the run well. Then when the hitler video ended (much sooner than the stan mayer) I run the demolition and it didn't run ok and kept stopping.

Who knows what is happening in youtube servers.
Do i mean that Stan Mayers is like Hitler ?

No, i mean that Stan Mayers is like Jesus, and i know for sure that he
is now in heaven, and heaven is much better place for living than this
beautiful Earth but inhabited with such a pathetic, degenerate, unsuccessful
abortions whose only skill and ambition is to destroy and kill everything and
everyone that brings good and beauty to this world !!!

And i know that you know that i meant it in the first place, but i accepted
your question as initiative to say above words, and i said them, and thanks
for your intention to hear this words !

We witness till the most recent time the same CAIN and ABEL pattern of
destroying everything and everyone who is capable to bring ease of pain
to this world, and i think that if this INTERNET opportunity is not going to
be used in the right way and RIGHT NOW than we are lost for sure !

Do you agree with me ?

bugler wrote:

I asked Peter several weeks ago what his view on the most interesting devices to invest our time on them.

He said he would give a comprenhensive answer. Hi must be very busy with the selling of the recent conference articles, videos, etc. Let's hope we hear his views soon.

I uploaded the image in his right orientation:
Thanks bugler for your uploaded image in its right orientation !
Does it mean you agree with me regarding my choice of the
right device ?

Cheers !
excuse me

Do not get me wrong but i think we are bunch of idiots !

Why ?

Because now in INTERNET era we have unique chance to help each other
to realize that OU goal, things are already made, for example this one :
see attachment !

Why do not we just help each other to make it and than every one spread it through his own channels ????????????????????????????????????

We should pick out one thing and make it, and publish every single
detail about it and that is it. And there is one other important thing :
We should use right one thing not wrong one, otherwise we lose precious time !!! Do you think that those guys who demolished wtcs are
not able to demolish internet too ?????? Seize the day, do not waste our
precious time !!!!!!!!!! It is your chance too !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your selfish
behaviour will destroy you too !!! Be certain of it !

Lets agree first what is that right thing !
I propose this attachment one !

Lets roll, because these mother #$#ers have been rolling us already
100 years, and with what result ?...They lead us to selfdestruction !
Is it finally time to stop this terror ?
Give your contribution, because you wont leave forever no metter how
reach you are, and if you are not reach do not try to become reach in
this "patented" way because you are going just to destroy yourself
and your idea with you !

So, there is no other way but publish it if you have something with
which you could help us !!!
Attached Files