13 posts
· 2 threads started · 113 more in threads this archive does not carry
· writing between May 2009
and Feb 2010
An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site.
Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
Here is the pic you asked. The outline was changed. Instead of direct cap discharge, a toroid wound with 18awg at 3 taps (3,5 - 17 - 43mH) for moderating the spike.
The diode bridge, again blown. I will remove it for all.
I had some fun with an improvised battery desulphator the day before.
I have ready assebled an 555time-ignition coil- bridge - 26nF caps and a adjustable magnetic quenched spark-gap with carbon electrodes.
I arranged my system in such way as between the cap and spark-gap to be my 12v battery!
If spike is what we want, then SPIKE we shall have!
The voltage is regulated via adjusting the spark-gap. i calculate from 1Kv-10Kv i can vary the distance.
I tried to put a 1000v 6amp diode bridge so as only to charge the battery, but bridge burnout the instance the machine operated.
So far, i operate it at the 1 Kv level cap discharge. The battery is not charging virtually since the current oscillates from the cap at discharge, but I think it desulphates it a LOT.
in any case, serious rf with a NE-2 bulb is detected at battery terminals that way.
attention: Batteries are liable to explode that way!
Sorry for not being that specific.
Measurements mostly taken are for discharging the battery. Previous charging has been made with DC current as well as from SSG at various voltages. (9,15,20,37)
When pulse charging, measurements of efficiency are based are on the input side of SSG. Not to the output since pulsed and difficult to measure.
i calculate the C rate of charging, by simply see what kind of discharge to a known Ah capacity battery has been achieved and how much time it gets to restore full potential. Lots of room for minor deviations and errors here but you get the overal picture accurate enough.
Somehow distant from original topic but i think worths a repetition.
........
The only thing that i can safely conclude and hugely affects the COP obtained is the battery discharge rate.
C10 to C20 can have as much as 10-20% more efficiency in power out of battery.
C1 to c10 can have as 30-50% more effcieciency in my setups.
...
I calculated that my newly conversed alum battery (previously factory ranked 6Ah lead acid-flooded type, in a:
* 1.65 Amps draw lasts about 1hour. (hence 1,65 Ah)
* 0.26 Amps draw lasts about 9 hours ( 2.35 Ah)
And if i stay in the C20 (0.15 amps) i expect somewhere 2,8 Ah)
Ok, nothing new actually. Well known facts.
...
On the other hand i find the charging of the battery is far more efficient in terms of efficiency than discharging. So charging in C20 or C10 or C5 little efficiency is obtaining by going higher C rates.
Foreword: I have searched this forum and failed to locate any specific thread on this topic alone. Much of it is incorporated in SSG thread. By the way i feel it is an important (the most important?) aspect of utilizing the impulsive "spike" technology by the battery use.
....
Anyone with a mediocre experience (As me) in the field of Bedini technology or others dealing with the impulsive state of electricity, can finally understand that at best their machines, if working properly, output pulses of electricity either of higher or lower frequency / voltage.
...
The common place at utilizing those impulses is the use of capacitor or even a battery as Bedini suggests.
Refraining from further "theory" i urge anyone willing to report their own experience and data (if handy), of how the COP of his/her machine increases/stays the same/decreases by repeated cycling of the batteries used i.e. "conditioning process".
Different batteries chemistries, sizes, C rates of charging/discharging, output current going to battery you name what, are to be considered here.
Yes indeed the normal alum is acidic in solution. However there have been (claimed) successful recoveries with silicate alums or even NaOH or KOH solutions.
Regarding performances for best performance for pulse charging could be
1) type of electrolyte solution composion
2) % solution
3) Times cycled
4) go figure...
Typically, it is said that at 10 or max 20 cycles you must have come near or above at original new battery specs...
Thanks Seph for the thread in this forum. I was not aware of that.
By the way, as i see it, alcaline or alum/lead based batteries offer a possibility of a method reclaiming old lead/acid ones. (not damaged ones)
By the way, it is understood that those type of batteries, once created are almost useless. They have to undergo severe charging / discharging process in order to have comparable results (or some claim better) than standard lead/acid batteries.
This sound like improving or even conditioning. Maybe they give better COP with pulsers? who knows..
......
I have studied some further into the issue and the inventor of the multipactor tubes it is said that call them consistently OU devices.
By the way, in order to avoid hot anodes etc ect we can employ Tesla coils of high RF and voltage for the multipactor effect to accur.
It is amazing what those Tesla coils could do. They can light in cold FL lamps, decompose water, almost everything due to their high energtic nature. The question is are OU? Again if they are in what setup? is it easy the setup to be made or require CERN facilities?
Can we expect FE from this direction with modest means?
