Aromaz

You might have a good point. In general solar panels are very ineffective at 11% to 18% yield. One of the much overlooked issues is the remaining energy not converted. That happens because biggest portion of sun radiation is at too high a frequency, not able to convert. This whole issue might be in just using that high frequency energy directly without converting to normal electricity.

The possibility that there are no electronics involved is quite high; and that might also indicate applications of the ultra high frequencies.

In what might be a possible similar direction; about two years ago I made an experiment with plants in a dark room; as in no light. The roof was pure copper sheet. The plants still remained green where plants in another section without copper plating turned white in 7 days. No instrument could indicate any energy difference.

Now I think I have a possible answer: Frequency been transmitted by the copper sheet.

@shawn; Thanks for this link. Amongst all my lists and readings I never found this one. Very well presented, informative and models.

You are SO right. But just imagine what will happen to the oil money if we
can start using the waste rods to make generators for every house that will
run for hundreds of years with no maintenance?

Nuclear material - in particular Radium

Chronology Of Some Key Nuclear Cycle Events In SwedenRadiant energy - That is Cosmic in nature; but also on earth. ALL energy
radiated from any matter falls into this category. From outer space we are
bombarded with Radiant Energy - re-read Nuclear Energy; Alpha, Beta,
Gamma and the full ElectroMagnetic spectrum Plus more. Thus if you have
a metal rod, coated with Radium - you can harvest Radiant Energy.

Nathan Stubblefields farm was (is) very rich in pitchblende.
Pitchblende is the ore from where America is extracting its supply of Uranium.

(other uranium deposits are in variety of other mineral deposits. In South Africa it is usually a by product from Gold mines.)

All of those mysterious experiments were Nuclear Based.
And all of those earlier successes in Alternative energy was Nuclear based.
Except: Floyd Sweet and one gent I cannot remember the name of at the moment: Actually made a car and died in accident, at same time all his notes and experiments disappeared.

Hydrogen alone does not burn nor explode - unless there is oxygen present.

And yes, there is much more value in the whole concept of using RF than any
other method to split the water molecule.

Interesting concept and one that I personally think has much more merit than the current use of energy to split the molecule.

I can think of two stages:
1. Heat up the water - to make the atom expanding and more receptive for the RF.
2. Resonate the molecule to split, skim gas off and burn for recycle.

The Teflon is sealing the screw thread of the bolt. Does not turn too easy, but is OK. Because the nut is steel, and your tube is glass; the only way to bond them is with with epoxy. Because of heat building up from spark, you will have to use high temperature silicon.

Everything is completley sealed.

Unless off course you want to purchase a commercial product - which you will be able to get in a lab supply shop.

@Aaron: Interesting thread indeed. I have not done my set-up exactly the same, though many similarities. My gas is also mix of Nitrogen, mercury vapor - and mixed in is ferrite dust.

Did you had a look at this design/concept?
Emc2 Fusion Development Corporation
I think the big-budget scientist can just not get their minds down to work with low budget - thus they can not think about simple options either. In this case they have a wonderful concept, but still go to the big autoclave rather than considering magnetic options.

Guess it is as I always say: It has already been done. Only there are so much to read and so little time!

@amigo: Easy to solve this problem. Buy some stainless bolts with Teflon locking nuts. Drill hole in front (thread) end of bolt, insert a tungsten rod (tig welder use same). Mount the bolts at both ends on glass tube to use for vacuum as well as observations; I used HT two part silicon (I think you will call it 'Gasket Maker' in USA). Can adjust easily and have strong clean spark.

Did you actually build the contraption? That is the only true proof. I have
never seen another presentation of this fuel cell. I have seen and I have
been interested; actually mesmerized is a better word. I did try some of the
concepts in experiments, and so did many other people - all just to fail.

"In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom
he had sold dealerships........Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered
a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed."
Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The big problem with TB's work is just that it is all in theory. What he
exactly means by the "Iron 2%Al" even me as metalurgical educated can not
understand - at least not why he consider it critical; and more so, why he
did not do it for experiments. After all a 1Kg sample alloy will cost less than
US$10 and very easy to make, even with molecular bonding. Except for the
MEG, Tom Bearden never did any experimental work.

MEG - to the best of my know; never worked yet. It has been on the "brink
of a breakthrough" for few years now; as is with almost all other devices.

Yes, it is very possible to produce asymetrical magnets - earth and electrical,
BUT the magnetic field will still be symetric. There is only one way to get an
asymetrical flux field and that is with opposing high RPM rotation force.

As for Floyd Sweet and his VT- that is one of the highest potential devices
to make, though extreme little info is availabe. In fact if you exclude the
Gamma radiating minerals, the Sweet VT and Methernita Testatica are the
only devices that has real potential for "free energy" or potential for OU.

The idea is there. I do think that John Bedini know how to do the
conditioning of the magnets; but that is such a potentially high risk
concept that I do also understand IF he know, WHY he would not share it
publically. And that is not due to suppression.

In both these cases, it seems that the secret does lie in the conditioning
of the magnets; to make them self oscillate. If you can do that, then you
will have 100% OU and unlimited electricity. On the other hand, after reading
some persoanl reviews of the Testatica 'magic' I do suspect more and more
that something like Radium or Polonium might be the key role player there.

I read, and read again. I was hoping to see something more powerful.
Yet I feel totally confused: Working...proven....do research....need to
develop? There is a red balance sheet here!

Nobody even did proper research! All is like clips from Overunity.com -
dreams. Very narrowly considered. This document even fails to refer to
some devices that were in fact operational AND working - by name, date,
inventor and results.....

Fortunately I am not in USA nor American, so the rest of the world
is fairly free of the problems you have.

However, with what I know and understand, I would not expect
this document to go very far.

1. 80% is based on theories of Dr. Tom Bearden - THEORIES; with all respect.
2. To date, none of these has been achieved nor proven.
3. A call might be made, which will ask for practical proof
- which you can not provide.
4. You are asking for funds - to do RESEARCH and devellopment
- all based on unproven theory.

Unless you can come up with somehting concrete, I do not think
this document will make any impression.

Besides, many of the things you are talking about are already in operation;
but they can not reveal it, or release it into public - for fear of people like
me that is sitting in Thailand. Technology like "COUNTER-gravity", ionic
propulsion (re. Lifter) are already in use for air and space crafts - and fairly
public knowledge!

As Investor, I can guarantee you this will not go off as investment;
way out too vague. You give a budget, but no business plan?

Anyway, as I said, I am not American, so who knows; you might be lucky.

I prepared an eleven hour presentation to my investors;
and even me alone has plenty more facts presented there.

Personal advice: Make a video presentation, cut it to be less than 20 minutes.
And use FACTS, demonstrations. Forget about the numbers, that can come
much later. Get the attention first, open your door.

A video presentation is worth a trillion words.

As for Pres. Obama - I have great respect for him and I do think he has
all the potential of being your best President ever. AND he is very intelligent,
way out more than all your other politicians. He knows how to play the ball
game there - not by learning from others; but by his own instinct.

There is no such thing as Free Energy.

Advice is yours to take. I would suggest the following:

A: Get your doctorate in Electrical Engineering; very good,
stick with the books - but keep your mind open.

B: Try to add (Nuclear) Physics as secondary.

C: Then, when you understand the basics as from conventional viewpoints,
you will be better equiped to do proper researcha and studies
in 'Alternative' energy.

D: Alternatively; you can study Physics and chemistry (as well as other related courses) in various forms from internet education like Indian universities and other in AU, UK and USA like Berkely.
In example: UC Berkeley Webcasts | Video and Podcasts: Fall 2008 Courses
Best: It is free and your own pace!

Suggest to do:
Physics for future Presidents
UC Berkeley Webcasts | Video and Podcasts: Physics 10/LS C70V

Personaly guarantee to be extremly valuable for anyone.

Most of what you will find around the internet and forums on so called
"Free energy" "Radiant Energy" Zero Point Energy" is junk, UNLESS you
have a good solid understanding of energy which you can use to sieve
out all the wind.

As per "Alternative Energy' per se; there is no course in any uni that I know of;
except one additional (secondary) subject from India.