adam ant

most of the YouTube demonstrations are simply audio on a speaker. even the audio frequencies are more powerfull than you can imagine. and if you can think geometrically, think about what the normal structure of simple water looks like and compare that to some of the cymatics video shapes that you mentioned. ill give you the hint... Hexagon.

what is interesting is that even with these 3-D demonstrations, they still do not show the true movements.

everyone read Damiens post... and understand what he is saying. it is ONE of the keys to the universe.

Damien, now take what you said a step further... why stop with trace elements only?


Amigo, you are off on both accounts. not necessarliy HV and interferometry exactly, these are just a fraction of what Tesla studied. Also, there is no way to "crush" the elements into the form im talking about.(nano)


Jetjs, you are referring to using Browns gas technology to "splice" different elements together as Aaron said, but the seemless uniformity of this guys rods are impossible with that technology. i watched Denis Lee weld a steel rod directly to a concrete brick, but as you said, there still remains a visible joint. look at this guys rods... no observable joints. plus, he would have to have a mold of some sort to gain the shape he wanted... unless he used a lathe to finish it off, but there still would be swirls. i doubt this guy used any sort of high heat processes on these rods.

John Hutchinson has his own technology that is similar to this. YouTube his name... there are a few videos on it.

-=bryan=-

i was hesitant to post, but since my nick came up ill throw out some thoughts.

he says there are no batteries involved... but what is a battery? two dissimilar metals seperated by an electrolyte.

well, 73 vs 74 makes it two dissimilar metals, with dissimilar energy potentials, essentially making this a fancy battery. this one is strong enough to work across the small air gap that he has, but i speculate if he emmersed the electrodes into an electrolytic solution he would get a much higher output. because of the density of the material, and the wide range of elements, the breakdown on this is substantially reduced. the energy gradually bumps each eleemnt in turn instead of the massive jumps we see in a conventional battery.

this is not what impresses me.

what impresses me is actually combining 73 and 74 different elements into one bar. because of the uniformed color, he did not use regular heat/smelting to join them together, there would be no way to prevent swirling, each element cools at different speeds, expansion/contraction would crack it, and if he managed to get through all of that, it would be extremely brittle. not to mention using it to energize anything would cause uneven stress throughout and dissintegrate it.

he must have found out how to bring each element down to its nano-size(which would be powdery like ORMUS)seperately and then mix the powders together with some sort of epoxy. 73 powdered elements + epoxy + blender(low speeds) + drying time = his results.

the only other way that i know to do this utilizes our technology and i cannot divulge that info here.

**cough** **tesla/rife** **hint**

-b

to aaron and amigo,

amigo, you are correct that the ancient egyptians, and also sumerians (and even beyond that) were involved with techniques that produced monatomic and duatomic elements.(that is, elements broken down to their single atom or pair of atoms)

one of the main people that i originally started with was Laurence Gardner and also Barry Carter. they have instituted the monatomic gold phenomina that is sweeping the internet right now.
HOWEVER!! it has been proven that gold CANNOT exist in it's monatomic form for more than a few moments, due to its odd numbered electron shell. the outer shell is incomplete as an odd number and MUST combine with another of its kind in order to exist.
also, they use lye burn methods which actually destroys the best parts of the product they are trying to create.

we have already proven that any form of burn, freeze, electricute, pound, or otherwise force to transmute elements is not cost effective, very difficult, and involves comples technologies. our understanding is in how all elements resonate according to a harmonic scale(cymatics), and can be GENTLY rattled into other elements. we basically "sing" to them in order to get what we want.(sing is a play on words, not literal)

transmutation can be done in room temperature conditions, with basic equipment that Mr. Lindemann, Mr. Bedini, Aaron and most others here probably have in their labs right now.

Sea Clearly

Very interesting! Please share whatever you can



i am currently involved with a company that can produce Hyper-Colloidal minerals. this essentially means they are broken down as far as they can physically go. (monoatomic/diatomic sizes)

this is only the beginning, as they can further compress the atomic structures into even finer sizes

and ultimately we can even energize these into room temperature Quantum Conduits otherwise known as superconductors. (Crystalline Metals (muff)/ Metallic Crystals)


please dont ask for proprietary info, we are not allowed to discuss technological details, only what can and cannot be done.

we have an already proven technology that can make a 1" x 1" Quantum Conduit supply 3 volts virtually forever.