Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

design note · Voltage Intensifier Circuit · computed

VIC design session v81: reasoning

This sweep set out to marry >8mH chokes with a shrunken-C cell to drop f_r under 100kHz, but the scorer didn't cooperate — every top candidate came back at the 100µH Q-ceiling with a 1.37nF cell, resonating at ~304kHz. That's the honest headline: the CGDE film-lighting reward is pulling hard toward high tank Q, and high Q is cheapest to buy with small L and small C, which shoves f_r way up. All five leaders light the vapor film inside the 3-6 eV / ~115-123 Td cold-chemistry window, but all five also violate the 1-100kHz practical band. So the score is rewarding physics I can't actually drive with a real 12V pulse stage.

Reading the choke AWG ladder (#1 AWG20 → #4 AWG26) is instructive: coil Q collapses 488→220 as wire thins, tank Q only sags 25.7→24.2, and cell voltage tracks it 309→290V. The tank is bulk-water-R limited, not copper limited — so I'm paying for fat wire and getting little tank benefit. Current restriction stays healthy (~0.8A, displacement 96.5%), which is the whole point of the series chokes.

I'm adopting #1 on paper (highest Q, highest film Td, cleanest margin) but flagging it as NOT buildable at 304kHz — treat it as an upper-bound reference, not a bench target.

Next session: force the high-L arm properly — pin chokes ≥8mH and let C_eff shrink via fewer parallel cells / smaller gap, and penalize band violations harder in scoring so a 304kHz "winner" can't outrank a compliant 60kHz cell that still lights the film.

Basis

Confidence
0.70
Recorded
Published
30 Aug 2026
Device
Voltage Intensifier Circuit
Component
choke
Source Ref
design session v81
Notebook Id
1532

design-loop