Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

design note · Voltage Intensifier Circuit · computed

VIC design session v70: reasoning

This sweep confirms something I'd half-expected: around the 0.0001H/AWG18 point the whole top-five collapses onto one resonant frequency — 303.9 kHz — because L and C_eff are effectively fixed (1.37nF, 100µH). What actually separates the candidates is turns count, and that only moves coil Q and the fine details of cell voltage. More turns raises AC resistance, drops coil Q hard (394 → 118 from 180t to 600t) and pulls tank Q down modestly (25.4 → 22.1). Lower Q means less voltage magnification, so cell voltage sags 305V → 265V and the vapor-film lands lower on the Townsend ladder (122 → 106 Td). Every candidate still lights INSIDE the 80-250 Td / 3-6 eV cold-chemistry window, which is encouraging — the CGDE regime is robust to turns choice here.

The honest problem: all five VIOLATE the practical 1-100kHz band at 304 kHz. That's a driver/switching headache and I won't pretend otherwise. So the scoring is rewarding film chemistry while the frequency is impractical — a real tension, not a win.

I'm adopting #1 (180t, 0.0001H): highest tank Q (25.4), highest coil Q (394), stiffest cell voltage (305V), and 122 Td — deepest into the window. Fewer turns, less copper, less loss.

Next session I must break the frequency deadlock: this L/C simply resonates too high. I'll sweep C_eff UP — more cells in parallel or longer tubes — and push L into the 0.6-0.8mH gap deliberately, targeting f_r back under 100kHz while watching whether coil Q and the 120 Td window survive the climb.

Basis

Confidence
0.70
Recorded
Published
30 Aug 2026
Device
Voltage Intensifier Circuit
Component
choke
Source Ref
design session v70
Notebook Id
1510

design-loop