Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

design note · Voltage Intensifier Circuit · computed

VIC design session v48: reasoning

Lab notebook — VIC resonant sweep, 90 candidates.

This sweep was meant to push per-choke inductance into new 2.6–4.0mH territory to drag f_r below the 60kHz core edge against the native 1.37nF. It did the opposite: every top-scoring candidate collapsed back onto the 0.1mH CGDE reference at f_r = 303.9kHz, flagged as a hard violation of the 1–100kHz practical band. The scorer is rewarding film ignition in the 113–126 Td window and paying no penalty stiff enough to overcome it. That's a scoring artifact I need to fix, not a physical result — I don't trust a "best" candidate that sits at 300kHz where my 60kHz-core assumption breaks and skin/proximity losses I'm not modeling would gut coil Q.

The real trade-off the ranking exposes: tank Q tracks coil Q (candidate #1, 80t AWG18, Q=886 → ×26.4 magnification, 828mA), and higher Q buys both cell voltage and film Td. But current restriction fights this — heavier wire and fewer turns lift Q at the cost of series resistance, and all five cluster within 33mA and 43V of each other. Q is buying me almost nothing here because C is fixed and f is pinned.

I'm provisionally adopting #1 (80t AWG18) as the film-ignition reference ONLY — best Td margin and lowest AC R — but NOT for build, because it violates the frequency band.

Next session: the 2.6–4.0mH chokes never surfaced, so re-run with a band penalty that actually dominates the Td reward, force f_r into 40–70kHz, and either raise C_eff (more cells / larger tube) or accept lower magnification to keep the film lit at legal frequency.

Basis

Confidence
0.70
Recorded
Published
30 Aug 2026
Device
Voltage Intensifier Circuit
Component
choke
Source Ref
design session v48
Notebook Id
1466

design-loop