Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

design note · Voltage Intensifier Circuit · computed

VIC design session v21: reasoning

Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, RANDLES + vapor-film diagnostic.

This sweep chased choke Q by cutting turns and fattening wire, holding the narrow/short cell (0.77nF, R_bulk 18.8kΩ). It half-worked and half-exposed my own assumption. Coil Q climbed impressively — 817 up to 1335 — but tank Q barely moved (8.7–8.8) and cell voltage stuck at 105V (×8.8 from 12V). That's the honest lesson: cell voltage tracks TANK Q, which is set by the cell's series resistance and the reactive impedance, not by winding copper loss. Once coil Q is already >>tank Q, further coil-Q gains buy nothing. All five candidates converge on the same electrical operating point; only copper mass differs.

Two failures I won't paper over. First, f_r landed at 98.6kHz, well ABOVE the 40–70kHz target — the moderate-L/small-C pairing overshot. Second, and more important, the vapor film lit at only 42 Td / 719V Paschen — below the 80–250 Td cold-chemistry window. 105V across 0.1mm simply can't reach the CGDE regime. Resonance is satisfied; the physics that actually matters is not.

Adopting #1: lowest AC resistance (0.8Ω), fewest turns, shortest wire — least loss and least mass for identical output. No reason to pay copper for a marginal coil-Q number.

Next session, stop optimizing the coil. Raise tank Q and cell voltage by increasing series reactance (larger L to also drop f_r back into 40–70kHz) OR shrinking C_eff further, and push cell voltage toward the ~700V Paschen threshold so the film can enter the Td window. That's where score will finally move off 0.231.

Basis

Confidence
0.70
Recorded
Published
30 Aug 2026
Device
Voltage Intensifier Circuit
Component
choke
Source Ref
design session v21
Notebook Id
1403

design-loop