26 posts · 6 threads started · 390 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Jun 2011 and Mar 2019
An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
kcarring wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but...
I've looked over the circuit, read the pamphlet, and as long as you follow the instructions, AND USE THE SECOND CAPACITOR, not just run the circuit with a single one...
it appears that what you will have at the batteries, is whatever you designed the circuit to have... and nothing more.
It would appear, the danger level is, whatever you set it to be.
I think that was George's whole point. It's not like he's a dummy. Furthermore, his commercial electrolysers exploit this method so they damn well better be safe and have probably had to go through CSA?
Thanks. Just an observation, not a "known"
Armagdn03 wrote:
Yes I see that, no fault on your end, but it really is just a voltage divider.
Armagdn03 wrote:
That is not a capacitive transformer. It is a reactive voltage divider. The impedance of different capacitors will differ based on their capacitance, and so will offer differing "resistance" to the AC current, meaning you essentially have two resistors one after another, creating...A voltage divider.
This is a true capacitive transformer, and a very good idea.
C Stack
nvisser wrote:
That is a very dangerous circuit and should not be posted on an open forum like this. People with little knowledge on electronics can kill themselfs with that circuit. The moment you remove the leads from the battery a voltage of about 150V will appear on that leads.